Gender Breakdown
Moderators: Players Department, Public Relations Department
-
west
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm
- Solfius
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm
well, depends on what that 150 lbs consists of. I'm carrying a little more fat than I'd like to, fat weighs less than lean mass, and bulks you out more. A person with a leaner physique could easily be thiner yet heavier.
I was just quoting Body Mass Index tables. I agree that you can ignore those tables and still be healthy (if that's what you were saying).
oops, going a bit OT here.
I think it'd be nice to have recent stats posted again like Jos did a while back
I was just quoting Body Mass Index tables. I agree that you can ignore those tables and still be healthy (if that's what you were saying).
oops, going a bit OT here.
I think it'd be nice to have recent stats posted again like Jos did a while back
-
Schme
- Posts: 2067
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 10:21 pm
- Location: Canada
- wichita
- Administrator Emeritus
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
- Location: Suomessa!
Yes, I was grotesquely thin then - a true twig boy. A truly funny sight padded up for football practice.
I am much closer to average now - 6'3" and about 180 lbs. I'm about to go make a run to White Castle that should help boost that though.
I am much closer to average now - 6'3" and about 180 lbs. I'm about to go make a run to White Castle that should help boost that though.
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
-
Cookie
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: NE & NW England
American Football pfft, theres enough pading isn't there.
I played youth county standard rugby back when i was 14. But I don't play at all now. I'm 6"5" and was pretty much tallest in my year back then but everyone seemed catch up aftter a while. Before that I always threw myself into anyone coming at me, never used to be skinny though.
I played youth county standard rugby back when i was 14. But I don't play at all now. I'm 6"5" and was pretty much tallest in my year back then but everyone seemed catch up aftter a while. Before that I always threw myself into anyone coming at me, never used to be skinny though.
-
Lemon Demon
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:55 am
- Yo_Yo
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 2:32 am
- Location: Hiding in the bush
Well we may have more pads... but then again they have more money and a longer career lifespan, or so I would think considering I just happened to see you guys playing rugby on some random channel. Its a nice bloodbath sport, but you guys can't honestly last that long in that sport, can you?
Vicki Vale: You're insane!
Joker: I thought I was a Pisces!
Joker: I thought I was a Pisces!
-
Cookie
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: NE & NW England
- Yo_Yo
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 2:32 am
- Location: Hiding in the bush
-
Cookie
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: NE & NW England
Not so easy, you would do far better being a soccer star there almost gods. Rugby is picking up pace though since England won the world cup a whole ne life of interest has happened but its still not likely. And as for rugby league, rather than union, your better off trying to become famous by beaing a postman.
- Floyd
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:01 pm
- Location: Essex, England
-
Antichrist_Online
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 4:49 pm
- Location: My Mistress's Playroom
- AoM
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Right where I want to be.
Sports own. I like 'em all. Except NBA basketball... not since MJ left Chicago.
As for the Rugby v. American Football thing... the way football is set up, it makes more sense to have pads than it would in Rugby. In Rugby there's a lot of lateral movement and a lot more passing the ball off, so there's less commitment to a tackle. In football, more often than not, the guy who's got the ball, unless it's the QB, is going to continue to have it. So the defenders have one thing on their mind: kill kill kill kill...
The hits in American Football are far more intense than in Rugby. Yes, there'll be outlying cases, but on average, you must admit that in the US sport, more pain is being flung around on a play by play basis.
As for the Rugby v. American Football thing... the way football is set up, it makes more sense to have pads than it would in Rugby. In Rugby there's a lot of lateral movement and a lot more passing the ball off, so there's less commitment to a tackle. In football, more often than not, the guy who's got the ball, unless it's the QB, is going to continue to have it. So the defenders have one thing on their mind: kill kill kill kill...
The hits in American Football are far more intense than in Rugby. Yes, there'll be outlying cases, but on average, you must admit that in the US sport, more pain is being flung around on a play by play basis.
-
Cookie
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: NE & NW England
-
Lemon Demon
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:55 am
Return to “General Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

