Animal damage

[InsaneIrony]

1012-2: You get attacked by a hawk, and you lose 1382 percent strength. You saved 18 percent using your wooden shield.

This has got to be a bug.. Right? Theres a huge chunk missing from my charrie's health now...

[Sunni Daez]

One of my characters was attacked by a moose, lost 1200 percent

[kroner]

1012-2: You get attacked by a moose, and you lose 1190 percent strength. You saved 10 percent using your iron shield.

this put the damage bar up to .119

[Agar]

Sounds like there's an extra couple of decimal places in there. Otherwise it would have been at 11.9 and you'd be a moose dropping.

[Junesun]

This bug has been reported and should be fixed soon. No, you did not actually lose that much strength, otherwise you'd have been dead long ago.

[Xander]

Atlantis just lost 3900% in Drofj. And (not my char) Louis O got attacked by a hawk - how much did he lose? Atlantis got attacked by a lion

[Surly]

I was about to say:

1012-6: You get attacked by a mountain goat, and you lose 867 percent strength. You saved 33 percent using your iron shield.

This cannot be right

But I think someone has already noticed...

[Junesun]

This should be solved now. Please mention further incidents if they happened after I wrote this post (NOT if you just noticed them after this post but they happened before).

[Antono Flavio]

I don't know, if these attacks happened afterwards.

1013-4: sheep atakas vin kaj vi perdas 381 percentojn da forteco. Via wooden shield rebatis 19 percentojn da perdo.

1013-2: Vous êtes attaqué par un(e) wild boar et vous perdez 2481 pour cent de vos forces. Votre wooden shield vous a épargné 19 pour cent du coup.

[Junesun]

Should definitely be solved now, at least one of characters got the message: 1014-2: Vous êtes attaqué par un(e) wild boar et vous perdez 18 pour cent de vos forces. Votre wooden shield vous a épargné 12 pour cent du coup.
(= You were attacked by a wild boar and you lost 18 percent strength. Your wooden shield has blocked 12 percent of the damage.)

Looks right... I mean, the numbers appear reasonable even though this attack was not reasonable and a personal affront to my char

EDIT: Of course this change is only effective for those attacks that took place after 1014-2. Please don't report any erroneous event of this kind that happened before the change.

[Lord_Igor]

1022-6: You get attacked by a sheep, and you lose 0 percent strength. You saved 39 percent using your iron shield.

A sheep doing 39 percent damage, is that usual?

[Jur Schagen]

1022-6: You get attacked by a sheep, and you lose 0 percent strength. You saved 39 percent using your iron shield.

A sheep doing 39 percent damage, is that usual?

Nope... that's the damage your shield COULD HAVE saved.

Jur.

[The Industriallist]

At one point it meant the amount it did save (not more than the amount dealt). So that's no longer the case?

[Nixit]

Erm... this is not exactly the same thing, but similar, so I decided not to start a new thread. Yay me!

Anyway, I was recently attacked by someone with a bare fist, and my shield supposedly saved 42% with my shield.... can a fist do that much?

[formerly known as hf]

read Jur's post - the number is what could have been saved - I guess that means that if the blow had been any harder than the value that your shield saved, the amount over that it was would be damage inflicted...