It seems to be weird that a person in cantr can carry thirty iron shields no problems, but in real life the most iron shields a person could carry and walk at normal speed for a long time is two.
Wouldn't it be great if the weights of different objects relations be normal?
eg. Make the iron shield 5kg or more
Make a car weigh at least 500 kg
a sword 5kg or more
and make a long boat weigh at least 1000kg
But of course, this would mean that those things would need more resources, and in cantr it is very hard to get 100kg+ of things in an average fourty year life time.( actually 400 days, because a person start at 20)
So increase the resources a person could gather a day.
eg. wood 10kg a day
stone 12kg a day
carrots 2kg a day
hematite 12 kg a day
and so on
if this was implemented then it would mean that there is really such a thing called emcumbrance. (or however you spell it).
A person could no longer hold ten long bows and five iron shieds and a broadsword.
What do you think?
Weight reset for cantr 2.0?
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department, Game Mechanics (RD)
-
Appleide
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 6:39 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
swymir
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: Cape May, New Jersey
- SekoETC
- Posts: 15526
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
I once suggested Cantrians are midgets and it might be true. It could be nice to have the weights made realistic but since they still couldn't carry much it would of course limit things. But that's the way of the world. But if the weights are increased then I want to see the ability for using tamed animals to carry things or drag vehicles.
Not-so-sad panda
- formerly known as hf
- Posts: 4120
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
- Location: UK
-
Revanael
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 7:15 pm
Who? What? Someone call me?
Oh, right. Hmmm...
Ah, go on then...
But. Remember that now Cantr II 2.0 will probably not extst. (read the plans Jos discussed last week: http://www.cantr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3743 )
EDIT: MOVED from Gen. Discussion to Suggestions
Oh, right. Hmmm...
Ah, go on then...
But. Remember that now Cantr II 2.0 will probably not extst. (read the plans Jos discussed last week: http://www.cantr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3743 )
EDIT: MOVED from Gen. Discussion to Suggestions
- Jos Elkink
- Founder Emeritus
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 1:17 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Contact:
-
myst
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:35 pm
- The Sociologist
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 11:54 pm
- griogal
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:30 pm
- Location: The Wilds
Jos Elkink wrote:Heh, I guess I'm the only one who voted for more realistic...
Nope, I voted that too...
But only if carrying capacity gets more realisic and carrying "tools" like rucksacks get developped
"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. "
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
