American Civil War Buffs

General chitchat, advertisements for other services, and other non-Cantr-related topics

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

rklenseth
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am

American Civil War Buffs

Postby rklenseth » Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:30 pm

Any American Civil War buffs out there besides me? :D
User avatar
watermelonnose
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 6:49 am

Postby watermelonnose » Tue Oct 14, 2003 11:22 pm

You talking about the war of Northern aggression?
User avatar
The Lurker
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 12:20 am

Postby The Lurker » Tue Oct 14, 2003 11:38 pm

Sigh. Here we go again.

To explain myself: On a message board for another game I once played, an argument about the American Civil War or the "War of Northern Agression", as it was also called on the topic. It was filled with insults (both to the historical figures and the participants) and flames. The argument raged on for 14 pages, with no sign of stopping.

Of course, I'm sure everyone on this forum will be much more civil and sensible, but still...
Meh
Posts: 2661
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:13 pm
Location: Way away from TRUE staff abuse

Postby Meh » Tue Oct 14, 2003 11:48 pm

So let me start fanning the flames.

The north unconsitutionally forced the south to remain in the union.
The north took on the freedom of slaves thing only as a public relations thing to get a symptanhy vote from the whole north and the europeans.
That freedom is a good thing but really they just wanted to force the contry to stick together which also is a good thing.
It was just not based on any kind of law.
It was a war of the value of one country and added the value of freedom for all but it was still illegal.
Meh
Posts: 2661
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:13 pm
Location: Way away from TRUE staff abuse

Postby Meh » Tue Oct 14, 2003 11:49 pm

So let me start fanning the flames.

The north unconsitutionally forced the south to remain in the union.
The north took on the freedom of slaves thing only as a public relations thing to get a symptanhy vote from the whole north and the europeans.
That freedom is a good thing but really they just wanted to force the contry to stick together which also is a good thing.
It was just not based on any kind of law.
It was a war of the value of one country and added the value of freedom for all but it was still illegal.

So when is the Karnon civil war going to start? (don't answer that)
User avatar
Rob Maule
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 5:15 pm
Location: Florida, USA
Contact:

Postby Rob Maule » Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:27 am

I don't think Richard was asking about opinions on the Civil War. He wanted to know if there was anyone here knowledgable in its history. I think he wants to talk about things that happened, not whether they should or shouldn't have happened.
Image
User avatar
ephiroll
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
Location: here and there
Contact:

Re: American Civil War Buffs

Postby ephiroll » Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:41 am

rklenseth wrote:Any American Civil War buffs out there besides me? :D


I'm not really a buff, but with all the history I read up on it's hard not to know a bit about it.
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
User avatar
Solfius
Posts: 3144
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm

Postby Solfius » Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:52 am

depends what history you read up about. I watch a lot of history programs, but know next to nothing about the American Civil War, so little I get it easily mixed up with the war of independance, which I know equally little about.
Meh
Posts: 2661
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:13 pm
Location: Way away from TRUE staff abuse

Postby Meh » Wed Oct 15, 2003 1:54 am

The country didn't grow much in the 75 years between those two.

I forget all the battles of the civil war.

I know that a wooden flating bridge (I forget what the name of that is) was made here to march union armies down.

Back in VA as the college of William and Mary I belive sometimes when it rained cannon balls would work there way up to the surface. I can't remember if those were colonial or civil war cannon balls.

There was some colinoal homes where you could see the patches of brick that were replaced to fill up the holes made by cannons.

But the details all escape me now. Every single battle of both those wars were required for tests.

The civil war is still the war in which most americans lost there lives, right?. The tech level was so equal on both sides. The south lost due to lack of key resoruces, blockaids and that the northern war factories were never touched.
User avatar
The Lurker
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 12:20 am

Postby The Lurker » Wed Oct 15, 2003 2:03 am

David Goodwin wrote:The country didn't grow much in the 75 years between those two.


Well, actually, the Louisiana Purchase (which occurred between the two wars) doubled the size of the nation, so I think that is significant growth.
Meh
Posts: 2661
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:13 pm
Location: Way away from TRUE staff abuse

Postby Meh » Wed Oct 15, 2003 2:14 am

Very true.

The population centers didn't move much though.
rklenseth
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am

Postby rklenseth » Wed Oct 15, 2003 2:25 am

watermelonnose wrote:You talking about the war of Northern aggression?


I'm a Yankee. Notice that I'm from New York who turned out more men for war against those rebel states who betrayed the Union. :D
rklenseth
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am

Postby rklenseth » Wed Oct 15, 2003 3:02 am

I had a long post made up but Cantr went down again and I lost the post and I really don't feel like redoing. Sorry. :(
User avatar
watermelonnose
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 6:49 am

Postby watermelonnose » Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:56 am

rklenseth wrote:
watermelonnose wrote:You talking about the war of Northern aggression?


I'm a Yankee. Notice that I'm from New York who turned out more men for war against those rebel states who betrayed the Union. :D


Lincoln betrayed the Union by destroying the Constitution and throwing out the Declaration of Independence.

I was once a Yankee sympathizer and Lincoln was one of my favorite presidents until I learned the truth behind the war.

It ended up not freeing the slaves, yet it released them from private bondage, but began the process of making us all slaves.
User avatar
watermelonnose
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 6:49 am

Postby watermelonnose » Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:01 am

Of course the Constitution was flawed from the start by allowing slavery in the first place. That was one of the great compromises. It was a very unfortunate one.

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest