Weight

General chitchat, advertisements for other services, and other non-Cantr-related topics

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

What's your weight index? (See formula below)

Under 18 - Seriously underweight
2
7%
18<x<20 - Minor underweight
2
7%
20<x<25 - NORMAL
12
40%
25<x<30 - Minor overweight
7
23%
30<x<35 - Notable overweight
5
17%
35<x<40 - Serious overweight
0
No votes
Over 40 - Dangerously fat
2
7%
 
Total votes: 30
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Weight

Postby SekoETC » Thu Sep 30, 2004 6:30 pm

Using the weight index we can check anonymously if people have weight problems here. I know it can be a sensitive subject for some, as it has been for me.

Weight index = Weight(kg) / Height(m)^2

I think the scale is a bit different in different places. If you've had kids then it's normal to weight a bit more and if you're young, it's normal to weight a bit less than average. When I used a calculator online and experimented a bit entering some weights I had had a few summers ago, I was a bit surprised to find that I had in fact been underweight. I tried to find an English version for the calculator but all I could find was a program that tells your ideal weight but doesn't give you any other figures.

I often feel so damn fat though I don't think I've ever been notably overweight, but I remember damn well in elementary school when everyone else was twenty something kilos and I was thirty something. I was always among the tallest girls in my class but that didn't matter, I felt like an elephant. I remember that damn sixth grade class portrait where I had tucked in my sweatshirt and I looked so damn chunky among all the skeletons... And getting breasts early sure didn't help at all. In lower secondary school I wore baggy clothes so that no one would pay attention to my body. Still some guys shouted things about my ass and told me to buy a bra though I was already wearing one. Once in the dressing room some girls started talking about weight and a plump one sighed she would sure want to weight five kilos less. "Me too", I said, and she gave me a long glance and said "Excuse me but where the hell would you take that five kilos from?" Still I continue being uncertain... I wonder if there are any girls in the world that wouldn't stand naked in front of the mirror, pulling in your tummy and wishing you looked like a model.
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
Pirate Lass
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 4:05 pm
Location: Portage, Indiana
Contact:

Postby Pirate Lass » Thu Sep 30, 2004 6:50 pm

I think we all have things we wished we could change on ourselves... let's face it no one is perfect. Even people we may perceive as flawless will have something that they personally wish was different. I know I will never be a boney stick - it's not in my genetics, and I am happy with that.
User avatar
Psycho Pixie
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Corona, like the drink, but not mexican

Postby Psycho Pixie » Thu Sep 30, 2004 7:05 pm

I picked the slightly over wieght because according to doctors I am over wieght. BUT!!! According to doctors, someone with my basic bone structure who is a whole 5 feet tall, should only wieght 105.

now, when I was a teen, in shape, active very healthy, I wieghted 115. I had muscles, because I tossed hay around and rode horses all day.

I will NEVER wiegh what doctors think I should. The weight index is screwy and is not truely accurate to each persons lifestyle. I personally think the wieght index should be remodeled.

I will never be a twig. I wiegh 146 right now and have a personal goal of 125. I will always have a big butt, and always have some padding because being a twig IS NOT HEALTHY. those models out there who are 6 feet tall and wiegh less then i ever did are not healthy, and certain not something to aim for.

Pirate lass and I and good examples of NORMAL women. Lass has a nice figure (in fact I think she has the most sexy butt and chest in the world. I live with her, I know she is beautiful) she is not a twig, in fact she is very curvy.... Curvy is good. Curvy is wonderful and normal and healthy!


dont EVER feel like you are not a wonderful beautiful woman because you are. no matter what the trend is!
Here I am. BITE ME. or not, in fact, never mind, dont want some wacko taking me up on the offer. Only non wacko's may apply for bite allowance.. no garentee that you will be granted said allowance, but you can try.
trage
Posts: 887
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:11 pm

Postby trage » Thu Sep 30, 2004 8:08 pm

Apparently I am seriously underweight, and to think I thought I was normal -.-;;;;. Yeah I got a 16.7, wooohooo. That's what I get for being scrawny.
west
Posts: 4649
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm

Postby west » Thu Sep 30, 2004 8:54 pm

I'm normal. Damn, that's disappointing.
I'm not dead; I'm dormant.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Thu Sep 30, 2004 8:59 pm

Yeah I'm a 21... Guess I got nothing to contribute.
The Industriallist
Posts: 1862
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:25 pm

Postby The Industriallist » Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:16 pm

I have trouble believing I'm underweight...maybe I don't remember the right numbers. Or possibly that isn't a very good chart...
"If I can be a good crackhead, I can be a good Christian"

-A subway preacher
User avatar
Oasis
Posts: 4566
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:30 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Postby Oasis » Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:22 pm

I'm having trouble with the conversions, but I don't think I want to know my number anyways. I think I know where I fit. ;;)
User avatar
Halley
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 5:10 am
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA

Postby Halley » Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:49 pm

I fell into the normal range.

One thing to keep in mind, however, is that these body mass indexes do not take muscle content (or lack thereof) into account. Many of them also don't take bone structure or gender into account. They also don't take into account the fact that some people are just naturally different weights and they have trouble going any higher or lower than that weight for any significant amount of time without adopting some very unhealthy diets/exercise routines; clearly that is the weight their body is most healthy at.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Thu Sep 30, 2004 10:34 pm

Oasis wrote:I'm having trouble with the conversions, but I don't think I want to know my number anyways. I think I know where I fit. ;;)

Not forcing you to go, but to anyone who is having trouble, http://www.worldwidemetric.com/metcal.htm
User avatar
nitefyre
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:29 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Postby nitefyre » Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:00 pm

Thanks Nick, accuracy I was calculating was with closest to 3 decimal points: (I at first didn't see the meters^2 part and freaked out)

The correct results for me was "18.30471117," thanks to my TI-83+.
trage
Posts: 887
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:11 pm

Postby trage » Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:06 pm

Wooo I am not the only scrawny one :P.
User avatar
nitefyre
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:29 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Postby nitefyre » Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:50 pm

I prefer the term lean ;)
trage
Posts: 887
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:11 pm

Postby trage » Fri Oct 01, 2004 12:09 am

Yeah sure you are 'lean' :P.
User avatar
kroner
Posts: 1463
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:39 pm
Location: new jersey...

Postby kroner » Fri Oct 01, 2004 12:41 am

I used to be about 19, now I think I'm nearing 21. I guess that makes me normal.
2 years ago, I was doing an internship over the summer at a lab and my mentor thought I was anorexic because I would forget to eat lunch. He would always make me go eat. He seemed very concerned. That was.. umm... interesting. But yeah, I'm not quite so scrawny anymore.
DOOM!

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest