Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

General out-of-character discussion among players of Cantr II.

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
Mafia Salad
Posts: 832
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:53 am

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby Mafia Salad » Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:19 pm

That's neat you could do that. Along those lines I would like to see some eye color stats, it seems like green is the most common in the English area at least. Probably comes from players staring at the green screen so much.
Fortune Cookie Says:
You should consider a career change, you'd make an excellent doormat.

[quote]1441-7: You skillfully kill a racoon using a broom.[/quote]
returner
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:11 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby returner » Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:26 am

SekoETC wrote:Heights from the character descriptions. Okay, the lines are wonky, I couldn't be bothered to adjust all the spaces.

Code: Select all

Height                  Men   Women
short, incl. rather ~           24   20
shorter than average            7    8
assumed short                    8   16
average                      30   29
not mentioned or ambiguous   53   41
assumed tall                  17    1
taller than average           13    4
tall, incl. very and fairly ~   57   17
less than 5 foot               1    1
5 foot 0 or around 5 foot    2    5
5 foot 1                    0    0
5 foot 2                    0    3
5 foot 3                    0    4
5 foot 4                    1    6
5 foot 5                    2    8
5 foot 6                    0    7
5 foot 7                    3    2
5 foot 8                    2    0
5 foot 9                    4    0
5 foot 10                   4    3
5 foot 11                   5    4
6 foot 0 or around 6 foot   10    2
6 foot 1                    3    0
6 foot 2                    4    1
6 foot 3                    1    0
6 foot 4                    4    0
6 foot 5                    1    0


How many people are using centimetres or metres?
This account is no longer active - please send any PMs to my new one.
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby SekoETC » Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:29 pm

Just a few people, and in those cases they usually provide both. But 5 foot certainly doesn't equal 160 cm, so people should be more accurate with their measurements. 160 is more like 5'3". Also people should remember that a foot is 12 inches instead of 10, so if you Google for "x cm in feet and inches", make sure to check that it really is rounding something to closest inches and not tenths of a foot.

I'm doing eye color stats next, but since I need to count them manually, it takes a while.
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
Surly
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: London, England

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby Surly » Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm

Interesting that the distribution seems to mirror RL averages.

That said, most of the "power gamers" who I'd expect to claim 7' behemoths probably don't bother with the descriptions!
Formerly known as "The Surly Cantrian"
Former CD chair, former MD chair, former RD member, former Personnel Officer, former GAB member.
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby SekoETC » Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:52 pm

Image

Surprisingly among men, blue is the dominant color. If someone would like to have an unusual eye color, there was only one instance of olive green, as far as I can remember. Although a mixture of brown and green could also mean olive, but that was likewise rare. Adjectives like bright, dark, light, piercing, cold, warm, stormy were common. Yellow/amber was very uncommon, although that didn't include a couple of instances of golden brown that might look like yellow in bright light.
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby SekoETC » Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:58 am

Aging stats:

There are 22 people that are very old and have a description.

10 show no signs of aging.

3 ambiguous

- 2 use the word old but do not describe signs of aging
- 1 albino

9 with some signs of aging, out of which:

- 4 have partially gray hair.
- 3 have fully gray hair.
- 1 has gray, almost white hair
- 1 has white, brittle hair.

- 3 mention wrinkles

---

There are 6 people that are in their eighties and have a description. No signs of aging, although one mentions muscles developing with age. That's a good point, as the mechanics do not support any sort of atrophy. Characters are only getting stronger and more skilled.

---

9 people that are in their seventies and have a description.

6 show no signs of aging

2 have graying or fading hair

1 has fully gray hair

---

11 people in their sixties with a description

6 show no signs of aging

1 ambiguous

4 show signs of aging:

- 2 only mention wrinkles
- 1 partially gray hair, wrinkles
- 1 gray/white hair, weathered skin

---

50s

14 show no signs of aging

5 ambiguous, they seem aged to me but wrinkles or gray hair isn't mentioned.

7 partially gray or faded hair
4 with slight wrinkling
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
Doug R.
Posts: 14857
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby Doug R. » Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:53 pm

Alright, I'll say it: >5 years of experience has forced me to the conclusion that the success of breaking a lock is not 50/50. What I'd like to see are the success/fail rates of every lock-breaking attempt in the last seven days.
Hamsters is nice. ~Kaylee, Firefly
returner
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:11 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby returner » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:49 pm

Doug R. wrote:Alright, I'll say it: >5 years of experience has forced me to the conclusion that the success of breaking a lock is not 50/50. What I'd like to see are the success/fail rates of every lock-breaking attempt in the last seven days.


Interesting proposal. Despite the result, I'd be interested in seeing a couple more of these in coming weeks (if you have the time of course!!) just to make sure we have an accurate figure!
This account is no longer active - please send any PMs to my new one.
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby SekoETC » Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:29 pm

A while back I counted the amounts of every kind of event, including lockpicking success and failure, and besides, I could've told you it's not 50/50 since it's visible in the code.
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
notsure
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 5:54 pm

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby notsure » Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:42 pm

How many people have the word "ugly" in their charrie descriptions?

ns :?
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby SekoETC » Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm

Just one. Maybe most people consider ugliness to be a matter of interpretation.
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
Indigo
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:45 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby Indigo » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:03 pm

Totally agree with Seko. I don't use "ugly", nor "pretty, handsome" or else.... It's just an interpretation under the watcher's eye.
Someone wrote:Being dark is an intelligent interpretation of the fabricated world, made up from our heads, there to tempt and play with us
User avatar
the_antisocial_hermit
Posts: 3695
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 4:04 pm
Location: Hollow.
Contact:

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby the_antisocial_hermit » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:25 pm

Same.
Glitch! is dead! Long live Glitch!
Remember guys and gals, it's all Pretendy Fun Time Games!
AlchemicRaker
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:56 am

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby AlchemicRaker » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:33 pm

Well, pretty sure most people here don't think "Yes! Now I can finally describe my Quasimodo clone!"

Though, I'm sure theres plenty who used pretty/handsome/etc as descriptions. These could be assumed to be relative to their local standards, but whatever.

- Natso
User avatar
Miri
Posts: 1272
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:32 pm

Re: Things you really want to see in "Cantr Statististics

Postby Miri » Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:54 pm

There are no ugly people - there are just unappreciated ones :P

I'd like to see the same description statistics in a month or so, when the descriptions become more common. I hope you'll keep a track on them, Seko :)

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest