Old Age

Threads moved from the Suggestions forum after rejection

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department, Game Mechanics (RD)

User avatar
Ryaga
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:43 am

Postby Ryaga » Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:16 pm

Arenti wrote:Why do people keep suggesting things that will make people angry or annoyed when implented?.... I'm sure there are things that can be suggested to actually improve the game and not just because it's more realistic.
It's not about realism. Nearly every change that leads to a better game is going to upset someone.
Image
User avatar
Arenti
Posts: 2814
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:31 am
Location: The Netherlands

Postby Arenti » Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:25 pm

The problem I have is that people too much look for large changes to suggest. I believe small changes will improve the game the most.
User avatar
Chasing Dingoes
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: Scotland

Postby Chasing Dingoes » Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:33 pm

My characters are still in their twenties and I'll be annoyed and upset if they were to die of 'natural causes' for no reason ago. That's without all the time and effort being put in to them as an older charcter has.
tiddy ogg
Posts: 1402
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Southampton, England
Contact:

Postby tiddy ogg » Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:22 am

I RP at least some of my oldies as they're losing it a bit, but when he's the only one in a town that's keeping it going, there isn't much option - he's got to run around everywhere while all the 20 year olds sleep.
Changes always upset some people, but if it makes a better game, fair enough. I don't see how killing off oldies is going to do that.
And my comment about killing my account is the way people feel, as I've seen from the forums. If you have commitment to your chars, that's the way it goies. If you don't have commitment to your chars, perhaps you should be playing some hack and slash game.
Cogliostro
Posts: 766
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:05 pm

Postby Cogliostro » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:31 pm

What if we have "commitment", but still don't think 120 year olds should be the same as 20 year olds from the game's perspective?

What other game should we be playing then?
User avatar
Piscator
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 6843
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Known Space

Postby Piscator » Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:07 pm

FTO?

By the way, why do you think a Cantr year should have the same effect on the body of a person as a RL year? "Year" is just a name for a certain amount of time. On Mercury, you could be 120 (local) years old and you would hardly start to feel the effects of age.
Pretty in pink.
User avatar
Ryaga
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:43 am

Postby Ryaga » Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:12 pm

Piscator wrote:FTO?

By the way, why do you think a Cantr year should have the same effect on the body of a person as a RL year? "Year" is just a name for a certain amount of time. On Mercury, you could be 120 (local) years old and you would hardly start to feel the effects of age.
The fact that the old are more susceptible to eating sickness? Or the fact that Cantrians are modeled around humans in a general kind of way?
Image
Cogliostro
Posts: 766
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:05 pm

Postby Cogliostro » Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:21 pm

"You see a man who is very old pick up some potatos."

Ok, Piscator. Do you go first or do I, we're comparing notes on how old we ought to think a man that the game tells us is "very old". He could be really young. On Mercury. :D
Last edited by Cogliostro on Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Piscator
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 6843
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Known Space

Postby Piscator » Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:22 pm

Your answer makes no sense at all.

What has that fact that Cantrians are roughly built like humans to do with the world they are living in? The world of Cantr is inarguably not earth and the fact alone that a year has twenty days should tell you that a Cantr year is not an earth year.

If everything that's bothering you is that an experienced character is called a 80-year-old let's redefine the year as 40 days and voila, they're 50 years old. It's bloody arbitrary.
Pretty in pink.
User avatar
Ryaga
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:43 am

Postby Ryaga » Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:26 pm

Piscator wrote:Your answer makes no sense at all.

What has that fact that Cantrians are roughly built like humans to do with the world they are living in? The world of Cantr is inarguably not earth and the fact alone that a year has twenty days should tell you that a Cantr year is not an earth year.

If everything that's bothering you is that an experienced character is called a 80-year-old let's redefine the year as 40 days and voila, they're 50 years old. It's bloody arbitrary.
If it doesn't affect the characters the same as an earth year than why can we tell how old someone is? If a Cantr year is less than 1 year you'd not be able to see any change year to year right?
Image
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Postby SekoETC » Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:42 pm

Just because years were shorter wouldn't mean that aging shouldn't show. The signs would just be less distinct. Cantrians are able to tell without error if someone is in their twenties or thirties just because it was easy to code that way. It makes more sense to think that Cantrians age a bit differently from humans, they might get gray hair and some wrinkles but aging slows down towards the end, and varies from person to person. We know it doesn't affect muscles.
Not-so-sad panda
Cogliostro
Posts: 766
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:05 pm

Postby Cogliostro » Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:42 pm

That's called begging the question. :D

We know it doesn't affect muscles pretty damn tenuously. The same kind of tenuousness as when we used to know that iron could be mined with a pickaxe, or that drying racks used to be decent.
User avatar
Ryaga
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:43 am

Postby Ryaga » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:19 am

SekoETC wrote:Just because years were shorter wouldn't mean that aging shouldn't show. The signs would just be less distinct. Cantrians are able to tell without error if someone is in their twenties or thirties just because it was easy to code that way. It makes more sense to think that Cantrians age a bit differently from humans, they might get gray hair and some wrinkles but aging slows down towards the end, and varies from person to person. We know it doesn't affect muscles.
Now you're just guessing. The burden of proof means that everything is false until proven true. And from the observations, and a little science called common sense there's at least some physical change in Cantrians.
Image
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15525
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Postby SekoETC » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:42 am

:roll: Cantrians don't grow weak with age simply because the numbers in the database won't grow smaller. That's what I meant. If they did then there would be a reason to tell everybody to act their age. While they don't, it's up to the players to decide whether they want their characters to be forever young or if they want to rp an aging process. Just like people are allowed to rp that their characters are fat or thin, or tall or short, but technically everyone weighs 60 kilos.
Not-so-sad panda
tiddy ogg
Posts: 1402
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Southampton, England
Contact:

Postby tiddy ogg » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:05 am

The 20 day year is a completely arbitrary figure. It means nothing. If it's going to cause such problems eliminate it. It makes no difference. You can tell your own chars age from their spawn dates, all Cantrian time is measured in days, not years.
OK, the "very old" bit is the big thorn of contention. Maybe this could be changed, but it's the translation into other languages that caused this to be introduced, I think.

Return to “Rejected Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests