nitefyre wrote:I feel our Human Resources people should place more emphasis on this, as I have told them and they have heard repeatedly.
But don't think the HR (or in Cantr, PerD) is not taking this very seriously at the moment! It is one of our top priorities and I have been hammering on it as well. The PerD and I slightly disagree on how to approach it, though
I am convinced that with better marketing, Cantr can be huge. But it requires that aspect. We need someone who is good in writing skills, who is strongly motivated to make Cantr big, who is innovative in how to approach potential public, who can motivate others to help, and who can avoid clinging to just one particular strategy. I have not seen that yet.
nitefyre wrote:On another level, the way I wish the Zine was more of, is from the editorial approach--being the OOC community's official press we're stuck between giving the official word and direct criticism.
I totally agree with both your ideas of what the Webzine is about, and it is one of the reasons I really liked your article this time. Well founded criticism, that does not turn into a rant, is definitely worth publishing, and shows we take things seriously.
I also like the style, actually, even though it sounds a bit tongue-in-cheek, it's also a way of showing that what we're doing is more 'real' than you might think. Sometimes I feel like I'm spending (wasting?) so much time on what is just a game and just online - but then when I compare our internal discussions with developments here at the university, or from stories in other organisations, it really is all strikingly similar to the Cantr organisation



