wichita wrote:Did he just seriously ask that question?

*looks again* Yes! He did. He asked that question. Neutral
I am going to wait for somebody else to come along, who has a healthier knack for stating the obvious than I do, to tell you just what an incredibly asinine .... I have a headache. I think my head is literally going to implode here.
This post I did not handle well, and I apologize for it. Those aware of how the situation with the flamewar in Non-Cantr Discussion was playing out in real time might appreciate the mood of the moment. I don't think it is a stretch to assume that a thread bringing into question a very fundamental (and I still maintain blatantly apparent) principle regarding the nature of the CR like that was intended to be antagonistic.
With all of the accusations and bad blood that had been stirred up in the past day or so, that thread was not the innocent little discussion needing to be heard like it is being made out to be now. That was dangerously timed and I felt it needed to be dealt with, which it was, but I being tired dropped the ball and wrote that little gem you see above. Sorry. I fucked up.
Like I say, I stand by everything else that I wrote in that thread or pretty much every serious discussion that I have ever taken part in. I am blunt. Especially when I am right. You can ask Surly.
wichita wrote:How about we focus on what has happened since then? Several players from the past with incredibly serious infractions have been given the second chance and are still with us adding something incredibly powerful to the game, most notably Brandon. Frankly the only time it gets drug up again on the public forums is when some mouthy little prick has some vendetta and wants to drag everything else down with him. For the most part we all learn to coexist reasonably well again and get back to playing the game in beautiful disharmony.
I stand by that too.
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President