Anti Flame Pledge

General out-of-character discussion among players of Cantr II.

Moderators: Players Department, Public Relations Department

Do you pledge to stop flaming?

Yes
21
51%
NO
20
49%
 
Total votes: 41
User avatar
Bran-Muffin
Posts: 2016
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: California

Postby Bran-Muffin » Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:22 pm

I did put a "No" you are correct.


Are you wondering why I put a "No"? If you are then you should look at my other post. This thread was started by a guy that was being one of the biggest pricks in that CRB's thread and the second prick in that thread was also the second to respond here.

They want flamming to end then why the hell were they doing it in that other thread? :roll:


*EDIT*

I'll take some IceCream, I havnt had any of that stuff in a long time.
User avatar
Marian
Posts: 3190
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:16 am

Postby Marian » Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:30 pm

If I wasn't so tripped out on love and happiness right now I'd point out that neither Agar or wichita's post contained a single personal attack on anyone at anytime, but me and this unicorn are going over to Mr. Leprechaun's house for cookies and rainbow juice now so I can't!

I probably won't be able to post in this thread again either, that rainbow juice always makes me tipsy.
User avatar
Bran-Muffin
Posts: 2016
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: California

Postby Bran-Muffin » Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:32 pm

:?


If you ask me... and a few others. They were pricks.


ANYWAY.... Have fun with that Rainbow Juice


Sounds potent.
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:42 pm

I said NO

Just because it was at 11/10 - and symmetry is next to godlyness...
Whoever you vote for.

The government wins.
User avatar
kinvoya
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: The Wide, Wide World of Web

Postby kinvoya » Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:20 pm

FLAME ON!

I think the fighting is a good thing. It livelies up the forums. I don't like to see people get too upset but there isn't anything wrong with a little, "Bite Me!!."

I have fought with many a player here who I now love and they love (adore, worship) me. Cantr is just a big secret love fest, that's the real CRB. :D

Hang on to your senses of humor, you w*nkers! Heh. I called Cookie Monster that once and it led to one of the best fights ever!
<a><img></a>
Duckers
Posts: 184
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 5:15 pm
Location: Somerset, England

Postby Duckers » Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:22 pm

Yeah! Kinvoya's got the right idea!

*he waves his torch and pitchfork*
User avatar
Nixit
Posts: 2307
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Your imagination...

Postby Nixit » Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:24 pm

That's the spirit!
Just because you're older, smarter, stronger, more talented... doesn't mean you're BETTER.
User avatar
wichita
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Suomessa!

Postby wichita » Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:29 pm

wichita wrote:Did he just seriously ask that question? :shock: *looks again* Yes! He did. He asked that question. Neutral


I am going to wait for somebody else to come along, who has a healthier knack for stating the obvious than I do, to tell you just what an incredibly asinine .... I have a headache. I think my head is literally going to implode here. :|

This post I did not handle well, and I apologize for it. Those aware of how the situation with the flamewar in Non-Cantr Discussion was playing out in real time might appreciate the mood of the moment. I don't think it is a stretch to assume that a thread bringing into question a very fundamental (and I still maintain blatantly apparent) principle regarding the nature of the CR like that was intended to be antagonistic.

With all of the accusations and bad blood that had been stirred up in the past day or so, that thread was not the innocent little discussion needing to be heard like it is being made out to be now. That was dangerously timed and I felt it needed to be dealt with, which it was, but I being tired dropped the ball and wrote that little gem you see above. Sorry. I fucked up.


Like I say, I stand by everything else that I wrote in that thread or pretty much every serious discussion that I have ever taken part in. I am blunt. Especially when I am right. You can ask Surly.

wichita wrote:How about we focus on what has happened since then? Several players from the past with incredibly serious infractions have been given the second chance and are still with us adding something incredibly powerful to the game, most notably Brandon. Frankly the only time it gets drug up again on the public forums is when some mouthy little prick has some vendetta and wants to drag everything else down with him. For the most part we all learn to coexist reasonably well again and get back to playing the game in beautiful disharmony.

I stand by that too.
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
User avatar
kinvoya
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: The Wide, Wide World of Web

Postby kinvoya » Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:47 pm

I think it's the heat. It's been hellishly hot here, wichita. People are on edge. And by here, I mean, over there on the mainland. Honolulu is lovely. :D
<a><img></a>
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:12 pm

Bran-Muffin wrote:Funny this thread was started by the one person being the biggest prick on the forums towards someone in CRB's... and then the second prick was the first to respond.


Sorry this prick here(me) is so late to respond. I have two words for the both of them.. but I wont post them here.


Well, that signals the end of my involvment with this thread. I'm sorely disappointed with this. I'm just going to stay of of all the general discussions now, keep myself to the only place on the forums where I have to be. Good bye for now.
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
The Sociologist
Posts: 878
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 11:54 pm

Postby The Sociologist » Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:50 pm

Have no idea what this is all about but voted no anyhow. :twisted:
User avatar
wichita
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Suomessa!

Postby wichita » Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:56 pm

The symmetry is borked. We need another Yes vote pronto.
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
15454
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:09 am

Postby 15454 » Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:26 pm

*pushes poll 'no' button* Flame On.
rklenseth
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am

Postby rklenseth » Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:43 am

...but I just got back. :cry:
Zanthos
Posts: 1525
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:08 am
Location: US of A

Postby Zanthos » Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:57 am

Its a tie again...
Person: Akamada doesnt control the animals.
You see a wild boar attack Person.
Person: I still dont believe you.

<Spill> Oh, I enjoy every sperm to the fullest.

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest