New places.

Out-of-character discussion forum for players of Cantr II to discuss new ideas for the development of the Cantr II game.

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department, Game Mechanics (RD)

User avatar
Doug R.
Posts: 14857
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:56 pm
Contact:

Postby Doug R. » Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:53 pm

I agree, a Cantr reset would be just the stimulus I need to give up the addiction, since it's my characters and not the game that keep me logging in.
Hamsters is nice. ~Kaylee, Firefly
User avatar
wichita
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Suomessa!

Postby wichita » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:02 pm

I will admit that my current characters are the biggest thing keeping me here at the moment, but I think I am still interested enough to start all over with something new and a few changes to the game dynamics, free roaming included. :)

I would like to see it a bit more like Civ or in the fact that the player(s) defines where things get built based on the environment. I would also only limit myself to about 5 charries, I think. :D

But, I would still hate to give up my current batch of personalities. I feel like other people depend on some of them being there too much.
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
User avatar
Doug R.
Posts: 14857
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:56 pm
Contact:

Postby Doug R. » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:38 pm

wichita wrote:I feel like other people depend on some of them being there too much.


Yea, I know what you mean. I have a rather unhealthy attachment to another character myself! I guess I would come back eventually, but I'd take a nice, long, vacation first. Plus, I wouldn't want to be in the PD when everyone begins trying to reincarnate their old characters. I'd do it myself (if I kept playing after a reset), so I'd have to recuse myself from the department.

Maybe the best solution is to preserve the characters themselves but just reset everything else. It wouldn't hurt too much to allow everyone to keep their characters if they lost everything they had on them.
Hamsters is nice. ~Kaylee, Firefly
Phalynx
Posts: 2324
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 12:12 am
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Postby Phalynx » Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:03 pm

You could run cantr III in paralel for a bit.... see if it works...
R.I.P:
Blake Stone, Jizz Bucket, Patterson Queasley, Billy Sherwood, Chavlet D'Arcy, Johnson.
User avatar
Oasis
Posts: 4566
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:30 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Postby Oasis » Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:55 am

Exactly what I was thinking. Why reset this game, just start up a new one as well. We can all play both! :)
User avatar
Doug R.
Posts: 14857
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:56 pm
Contact:

Postby Doug R. » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:20 pm

That would just mean Cantr II would slowly rot, since new players would play III. Not much fun.
Hamsters is nice. ~Kaylee, Firefly
User avatar
wichita
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Suomessa!

Postby wichita » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:59 pm

15 more characters on top of what I already have? :shock:

*finds a need for the exploding head emoticon, and waits for Phalynx to post some dumbass animated gif*
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
Phalynx
Posts: 2324
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 12:12 am
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Postby Phalynx » Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:08 pm

Doug R. wrote:That would just mean Cantr II would slowly rot, since new players would play III. Not much fun.


Make up your mind... you can't have your cake and eat it..!

(does anyone esle think that particular cliche makes no sense??)

Oh and for wichita:
Image
R.I.P:

Blake Stone, Jizz Bucket, Patterson Queasley, Billy Sherwood, Chavlet D'Arcy, Johnson.
User avatar
Crosshair
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Brighton, UK.

Postby Crosshair » Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:16 pm

I think it didn't work for the particular scenario... perhaps "You cannot have the penny and the bun" would be more suited.
[url=http://dragcave.net/view/tvkg][img]http://dragcave.net/image/tvkg.gif[/img][/url]

[url=http://dragcave.net/view/RgKP][img]http://dragcave.net/image/RgKP.gif[/img][/url]

Return to “Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest