Postby Wolf » Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:56 am
After actually going through the full thread, I forgot who made the point (or even how it was formulated) that made me want to post this, but... here goes.
I'm not sure of how the mechanics behind it work, but one of my chars has been quite impressive with a sledgehammer, I know it involves her skill, fatigue and health and stuff, but still, there has to be more to it that I as a player don't see (and don't care to see).
All I know is, she's having a great time whacking desert tortoises.
She also has an apache throwingstar and other weapons, which seem to be better for other targets (other animals) but usually don't even put a dent in a tortoise, but the sledgehammer, to her and those watching her, has proven to be a real tortoise-killer.
Then there's one other char of mine with a sledgehammer, a greater skill at hunting, and in comparable health/fatigue, who also has some of the same animals available to hunt... yet he has more luck offing tortoises with his bone spear, and considers the sledgehammer a lousy weapon in general to hunt with.
The point is that to me (as a player) comparing those two chars with their sledgehammer and other weapons, makes me think that while there is a weapon which probably has the highest averages, there might be cases where a weapon with a lower rating actually is more powerful to it's wielder.
Of course, that point would go overboard if some char manages to make everything that can be used as a weapon, and finds out that the highest-rated weapon actually does so much damage that even with the other factors and mechanics involved, none of the other weapons come close.