The most popular goverment in Cantr

General out-of-character discussion among players of Cantr II.

Moderators: Players Department, Public Relations Department

What type of goverment is most popular in CANTR? Who rules?

Anarchy (wild west, nobody)
12
32%
Tribal Council (oldest and wisest)
9
24%
Despotism (strongest)
8
21%
Monarchy (elected monarch)
2
5%
Democracy (direct, like in Greece)
0
No votes
Republic (indirect, like in Rome)
2
5%
other
5
13%
 
Total votes: 38
User avatar
PRUT
Posts: 826
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: Poland

The most popular goverment in Cantr

Postby PRUT » Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:16 pm

As in topic... I wonder which type is accepted widest?
User avatar
mortaine
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:22 pm
Location: Scotts Valley, CA
Contact:

Postby mortaine » Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:18 pm

You forgot "Monarchy-- not elected," which is by far the more common type of monarchy anywhere. In fact, what the heck is an elected monarchy except a republic?
--
mortaine.
User avatar
PRUT
Posts: 826
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: Poland

Postby PRUT » Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:24 pm

"Monarchy not elected" is similar to "Despotism" :D

In "Monarchy" the monarch once elected is pernament, forever.
In "Republic" authorithy could be changed

I think that is a difference.
User avatar
nitefyre
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:29 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Postby nitefyre » Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:27 pm

I voted anarchy merely because if you look at all the locations in the big picture, the majority of them are not under claim.


Not necessarily the one I'd like to be living in. I don't know if I have a favorite.
User avatar
mortaine
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:22 pm
Location: Scotts Valley, CA
Contact:

Postby mortaine » Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:02 pm

No, Monarchy-not elected could be Monarchy by inheritance (the Passing of the Keys), or Monarchy by Right of Being the Only Guy There.

Despotism is what we see so very often in the Forests-- tribal leadership by force of arms.
--

mortaine.
User avatar
wichita
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Suomessa!

Postby wichita » Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:46 pm

My favorite governments in game have been where the people who had been around the longest sort of share the responsibility for helping the newer members. This can go wrong too, but when it works I think it has made for the smoothest social structure I have played in.
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
rklenseth
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am

Postby rklenseth » Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:52 pm

Is this opinion or based on how many of those goverments actually exist?

Also, you are missing at least one other....a communal system.
User avatar
AoM
Posts: 1806
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Right where I want to be.

Postby AoM » Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:31 am

Serenity beat me to it. Yes, a communal system needs to be on the poll.

I'd also love to see a Theocracy in Cantr. But that's another topic.

As far as what's out there, Anarchy's probably the biggest, followed by the Tribal Council system for those towns just coming out of anarchy. From there it really depends on the personalities in the town, but I'd say Despotism's the next biggest, and then maybe Republic or Communal systems.

I feel that it's tough to differentiate a Monarchy from a Despotism in Cantr. No one's died of old age yet, so the passing of the key's that proves it's a monarchy is not really tested all that much.


As for which of these governments is my favorite? I like the council/communal governments. Followed closely by the Republic system, so long as there's a good standing army. :)
Schme
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: Canada

Postby Schme » Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Well, I've never seen a tribal council, nor really a monarch or anything.

The most thing I've seen is defacto leadership, either by people who became leader because all the old people died and are still alive, or someone who became unofficial leader just because they take on leadership role.

The most common though, would be the rule by gangs and militias, although most of those groups would not call themselves that.
"One death is a tragedy, a million is just statistics."
Joseph Stalin
User avatar
PRUT
Posts: 826
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: Poland

Postby PRUT » Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:46 am

I though about the comunal system, but I was interested in who rules?

I think comune is rather social sytem than a goverment.
Imagine comune... there can be three options of ruling:

• Despotism (like in USSR :twisted: ) One man who is strong enough to force his ideas - even if everything belongs to everyone

• Direct democracy, where everyone decides about any decision by voting every idea - ideal comune :wink:

• Tribal council, where some natural leaders (because of their wise and experience) decides what to do, and others accept it with trust.

That's why I didn't put comune into poll.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:17 pm

PRUT wrote:• Tribal council, where some natural leaders (because of their wise and experience) decides what to do, and others accept it with trust.


That's what works best, if it goes right.
If you have good leaders, that is.
User avatar
Doodle_Jack
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Netherlands (Tilburg)

Postby Doodle_Jack » Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:37 pm

Nick wrote:
PRUT wrote:• Tribal council, where some natural leaders (because of their wise and experience) decides what to do, and others accept it with trust.


That's what works best, if it goes right.
If you have good leaders, that is.


I agree.

If you have only one leader, the community is very vulnerable, because if that one leader gets the sleeping illness the struggle for power starts which will cause temporarilly political chaos.

If you have the direct democracy, the decission taking takes very long.

If only a few people are the ones taking decissions, the making of decissions can be done quickly and if one councillor falls asleep the remaining counsillors are still able to make decissions.

PS. I just love the political games in Cantr. Not that I have a lot of political figures. It's a shame actually......
Cookie
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:51 am
Location: NE & NW England

Postby Cookie » Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:42 pm

I feel safe in saying that there is no such thing as a traditional 'Monarchy' in Cantr. For one obvious reason.
User avatar
Bowser
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:55 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

Postby Bowser » Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:58 pm

Natural Leader and "Only Key Holder" are two different things.
Homer wrote: "Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals ... except the weasel. "
Antichrist_Online
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 4:49 pm
Location: My Mistress's Playroom

Postby Antichrist_Online » Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:08 pm

I think anarchy/tribal governments are the most common.

There is a theocracy in cantr run by one of my characters, but I'm not saying where.

My personal favorite form of leadership was a benigh dictatorship, similar to the old Sjoftich system or what I'm aiming for somewhere else. Similar to communism but with a perminant strong leader who does whats best for his people (instead of seeking power).
Mistress's Puppy

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest