Smoke

[west]

And your the only one doing it.

Well, as of right now, yes. But your quite famous for it.

YOU'RE!

When you are trying to say YOU ARE, as in "You're crazy,"
it's Y O U apostrophe R E.

You're.

When you are trying to denote possession, such as "your crossbow,"
it's Y O U R.

Your.

It's that simple. "You're" is a contraction of "you are." "Your" means "belonging to you."

Bow to me. I am the grammar police!

[formerly known as hf]

The long dead ghost of the English langauge has been turning in his grave...

[Cookie]

Yeh west, calm you're tone!

[Floyd]

Nicks right. And plus we'd just have a bunch of godamn new players running around trying to toke up electronically (most of which would be kids, see simulated drunkness thing Industrialist did) rather than trying to actually play the game.

And man, a hemp LAB?

What the hells a hemp LAB?

You don't make weed in laboratories man, you grow it. Your confusing your banned substances.

sorry, who's the stoner here? never heard of Hydropinics or... dammit... whats the word.. ah, cross breeding? Weed is a culture thing now, people will pay more money for something wich tastes good and garentees a better High. sadly, the age of homegrown is all but on it's way out

[Nixit]

*bows down to the grammar man West*

Please excuse my horrible word usage, I did not want to offend your grammatical holiness... I ask... no I beg for your forgiveness!

[west]

*looks down upon him from a great grammatical height*

Your humility pleaseth me. You may rise, save that thou never again offend the grammar of your mother tongue.

[Schme]

sadly, the age of homegrown is all but on it's way out

Exactly. Quality out, mass production in. They call it a grow op, now. Get with the times.

[Schme]

And your the only one doing it.

No, really?
Someone did NOT get that joke.

\


I got the joke. I just don't think it's funny.

[Schme]

So that's how you want to play it, eh?

"Your" means "belonging to you."

Bow to me.

Those are both fragment sentences. Boy to me, I am the grammar paramilitary!

[formerly known as hf]

schme, I am so tempted to delete any post after your first when you double/triple post...

Don't tempt me - you post whore supreme...

[Schme]

I do not know what that means.

[formerly known as hf]

don't play the fool with me young man...

So often, you post something, then another one or two straight after. Part of me finds the patience and dedication that takes somewhat admirable - I know there is an enforced delay between posts... Part of me admires the post whore nature of it - grabbing posts wherever you can, in numerous quantities, added to by double/triple posting - I should know, I'm a self-admited post whore sometimes.. But double posting - that's extreme... And it is that which part of me finds somewhat admirable

The rest of me finds it deeply annoying...

[Schme]

I am sorry, but I do not know what you mean. I don't really use computers much apart from this, and I'm not really familiar with internet lingo, espicially not English internet lingo.

I'm sorry, but I don't know what you mean.

[TatteredShoeLace]

Schme, you'll post, and then usually the next post SHOULD come from someone else. But you like to post after yourself (the doublepost) or post after your own doublepost (the infamous Tripler).

There is an edit button so if you feel the need to add stuff, do it that way.

EDIT: Common courtesy is to make mention of what you did edit, like this right here <-

[west]

So that's how you want to play it, eh?

"Your" means "belonging to you."

Bow to me.

Those are both fragment sentences. Boy to me, I am the grammar paramilitary!

Neither of these are sentence fragments. They are merely short sentences.

The first has a subject (your--which, being in quotes, becomes a noun: the actual WORD "your"), a linking verb (to mean) and an object (the phrase "belonging to you", which in this context, referring to the actual phrase, is again a noun). It's the same kind of sentence as "Schme is mistaken".

The second is also a sentence. It is what's called an "imperative"; the subject is the "understood 'you'". The verb is "to bow", and the object of "to bow" is "me". It is the same as saying "You bow to me".

Indeed, your phrase "Boy to me!" is a fragment, unless you merely forgot your punctuation. "Boy, to me!" would indicatet that you, perhaps a knight on the battlefield, have broken your lance and are calling me, your squire, to you with a replacement.

I am afraid you are foiled again, Oh pussilanimous parakeet, parroting the paragon of perfection (that is to say, me).