As dictator of the world i want to make all talking pretty and nice, yes. SO We shall all speak gibberish now and the mean peoples will not stop us!
Grievu maxari'uka tse mariakus!
History Lesson; you'll love this one
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
- new.vogue.nightmare
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 8:55 am
- Location: Right behind you. No, really.
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 1:13 pm
- Location: Anti-Climactic Post Apocalyptic Studios
Most regional dialects died out from lack of use but there are still groups that speak the regional dialect fluently, so your idea that going from one town to another would result in you hearing a completely different dialect is unfounded.
The only reason that American English appears more organised (which I don't see how it is or why you think it's any more organised or British English dis-organised) is because it just took what was coming from Britain, the railways came from Britain and with them came standardised time keeping, speedy travel breaks down dialects and natural boundaries.
The only reason that American English appears more organised (which I don't see how it is or why you think it's any more organised or British English dis-organised) is because it just took what was coming from Britain, the railways came from Britain and with them came standardised time keeping, speedy travel breaks down dialects and natural boundaries.
- kroner
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:39 pm
- Location: new jersey...
-
- Posts: 4736
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am
Camino wrote:Most regional dialects died out from lack of use but there are still groups that speak the regional dialect fluently, so your idea that going from one town to another would result in you hearing a completely different dialect is unfounded.
The only reason that American English appears more organised (which I don't see how it is or why you think it's any more organised or British English dis-organised) is because it just took what was coming from Britain, the railways came from Britain and with them came standardised time keeping, speedy travel breaks down dialects and natural boundaries.
I'm not talking about today. I'm talking about pre-1900's before railroads and such transportation was widespread in England. Before there was a need for such things that the Industrial Revolution allowed to occur.
Railroads really became widespread in America first because that is were they first developed granted the first successful steam engine was built in Britian but most of travel in Britain at this time was done by boat. America had huge areas of land which is one reason why the railroads popped up in America first creating huge ammounts of travel among Americans which allowed an American standardized version of English to develop first. Plus there was an education factor involved as well. Britain was still having their children work in mine shafts when America was making their children go to school. So children weren't really educated and formed their own dialects or versions of English from what they got from home or their own community.
-
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm
takin' ya'll back a bit
Fxck is not an acronym, nor a derivative of pluck.
the earliest known written instance of it is in 1503, according to the OED, who ought to know.
and it doesn't have anything to do with plucking or yew. That's just dumb.
Fxck is not an acronym, nor a derivative of pluck.
the earliest known written instance of it is in 1503, according to the OED, who ought to know.
1. intr. To copulate. trans. (Rarely used with female subject.) To copulate with; to have sexual connection with.
and it doesn't have anything to do with plucking or yew. That's just dumb.
I'm not dead; I'm dormant.
- Solfius
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm
Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest