BRONZE: The Iron Alternative
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department, Game Mechanics (RD)
-
NetherSpawn
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:27 am
Go bronze!
A comment: why does a wood shield block less damage than an iron shield? It's much bigger! 500g of a lighter substance than iron, versus 300g of iron, the wood shield is bigger. In reality it would block more, if anything, unless it broke.
The thing is, in reality, that wood shield isn't going to stand up long against iron (or probably bronze) weapons. Wood breaks and soon your shield will be pretty useless. But in Cantr, deterioration doesn't work like that, and you don't hit each other so frequently in a fight. Plus you could just switch to a new wooden shield. Since iron shields cost more in Cantr, they have to be more functional. The same applies to iron and bronze.
When an iron blade hits a bronze blade or shield or armor, the bronze can be cut straight through, much like Damascus or Japanese steel swords against cast iron. That's the main reason why people switched to iron equipment. If you use bronze against iron, you lose. Cantr has to represent this distinction somehow, and the way things are set up it can't do it very realistically, so there's the good damage and blocked damage differentials.
In a nutshell, iron weapons and armor would have to be better than bronze to work in Cantr. Bronze is just as sharp only on the first hit.
To make bronze worthwhile, I say cut the coal requirement. Bronze smelting could require wood instead.
To make bronze really cool, what if you could smelt bronze in a firepit? I'm not sure whether this is accurate or not, but the reason people used bronze instead of iron (bronze is actually much harder to get the components of in reality) is that they couldn't get hot enough fires to smelt iron properly. Probably either coal (instead of wood) or the use of a bellows was what fixed that problem. Coal burns much hotter, and bellows cause much hotter flames.
Anyway, I think bronze should be smeltable in a small firepit using wood, less efficiently but that's beside the point.
A comment: why does a wood shield block less damage than an iron shield? It's much bigger! 500g of a lighter substance than iron, versus 300g of iron, the wood shield is bigger. In reality it would block more, if anything, unless it broke.
The thing is, in reality, that wood shield isn't going to stand up long against iron (or probably bronze) weapons. Wood breaks and soon your shield will be pretty useless. But in Cantr, deterioration doesn't work like that, and you don't hit each other so frequently in a fight. Plus you could just switch to a new wooden shield. Since iron shields cost more in Cantr, they have to be more functional. The same applies to iron and bronze.
When an iron blade hits a bronze blade or shield or armor, the bronze can be cut straight through, much like Damascus or Japanese steel swords against cast iron. That's the main reason why people switched to iron equipment. If you use bronze against iron, you lose. Cantr has to represent this distinction somehow, and the way things are set up it can't do it very realistically, so there's the good damage and blocked damage differentials.
In a nutshell, iron weapons and armor would have to be better than bronze to work in Cantr. Bronze is just as sharp only on the first hit.
To make bronze worthwhile, I say cut the coal requirement. Bronze smelting could require wood instead.
To make bronze really cool, what if you could smelt bronze in a firepit? I'm not sure whether this is accurate or not, but the reason people used bronze instead of iron (bronze is actually much harder to get the components of in reality) is that they couldn't get hot enough fires to smelt iron properly. Probably either coal (instead of wood) or the use of a bellows was what fixed that problem. Coal burns much hotter, and bellows cause much hotter flames.
Anyway, I think bronze should be smeltable in a small firepit using wood, less efficiently but that's beside the point.
"We will change our world forever. You will handle the arrangements."
- Nick
- Posts: 3606
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
- Location: Halifax, Canada
I'd agree with him on this. But instead of not having any coal to smelt the bronze, I'd suggest a wood alternative. Considering it is the lower grade metal and all.
If steel/iron will still beat out bronze, I think It'd be a good idea. Otherwise, you'll just have people hoarding the copper/tin reserves, and it will be the same as it was with hematite.
If steel/iron will still beat out bronze, I think It'd be a good idea. Otherwise, you'll just have people hoarding the copper/tin reserves, and it will be the same as it was with hematite.
- TatteredShoeLace
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 1:50 am
- Nick
- Posts: 3606
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
- Location: Halifax, Canada
- Solfius
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm
My quick research suggests bronze can be smelted using a wood or charcoal flame (and also presumably coal as it burns hotter than the other two).
Copper and tin ore would also be needed.
As for iron reserves, some reserves could be degraded into other types of ore, in a mysterious cantr way, or new islands could have a mix of ores, so older islands in effect become iron rich areas (hematite is the foremost iron ore with the highest concentration of iron, all other ores are inferior in terms or iron to ore ratio)
Copper and tin ore would also be needed.
As for iron reserves, some reserves could be degraded into other types of ore, in a mysterious cantr way, or new islands could have a mix of ores, so older islands in effect become iron rich areas (hematite is the foremost iron ore with the highest concentration of iron, all other ores are inferior in terms or iron to ore ratio)
-
Appleide
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 6:39 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Solfius
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm
- Spectrus_Wolfus
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Solfius
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm
-
Revanael
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 7:15 pm
- kroner
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:39 pm
- Location: new jersey...
- Spectrus_Wolfus
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Solfius wrote:Glad to hear it Spectrus. I haven't seen many staffers recently, except Revenael, and even less of them mentioning what they are doing. Especially the higher echeleons of the PrD, GAC, etc
that's ok we are still about but i beleive with end of term type things and the such it's slowing down a lot of work by some people. i started this before the server went slow and getting the info i needed off the server was a pain to say the least.then when the server got fixed my missus had a kid so times very transient commodity with me at present but when i have a spare 5 minutes i do a bit more
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

