Appleide wrote:3 grams of that volcanic stuff a day, where ever mountains AND gold are. The tools, average need 100-200 grams of the stuff. Hard enough?
That sort of figure, yes. Maybe up to 5 grams a day if one limits the weapon to some kind of obsidian spear, drops the building implements and maybe one or two of the others. One could still leave space for a "bronze" age.
You are on the right track with "mountains AND...", I think, but probably not gold, diamonds or silver. Perhaps better to make it mountains plus some other material that's not used much. Perhaps wherever chromium or some similar metal is, plus wherever stone is by itself, or some combination like that. So it wouldn't just crop up wherever stone is. I agree now that such a distribution would still be too much.
NetherSpawn wrote:Mountains and gold seems like a somewhat irrational requirement. I'd go with mountains and sand, because you need "volcanic" but you also need glass. That narrows the choices down a bit, but it gives people a reason to go to the mountains. In most of Cantr you just have to go to an "Iron Forest" to get the hematite you need, and mountains don't have much else.
I looked through my maps for mountains and sand, but... Anyway, I don't think one needs to be hyperrealistic about the geology. Putting hematite and wood together is bad enough. I agree, though, with giving people a reason to go into the mountains!
NetherSpawn wrote:Would there be a tool and/or machine to harvest obsidian? Obsidian couldn't have a shield. That would be tough on it, but makes sense. With obsidian weapons and bone shields, you could have a Cantr war where damage is actually inflicted! (Damage is pretty light at most technology levels of combat if shields don't fail.)
I prefer damage the way it is in the sim. You would need an obsidian tool to dig obsidian, I suppose--"obsidian digger". But no machine is possible. It's collected in smallish quantities even today--it's used for ultra-sharp scalpels for microsurgery and whatnot. If you touch them, you've cut yourself, since your skin cannot resist a cutting edge only a molecule wide.
And yes indeed, no shield at all.
Spectrus_Wolfus wrote:the RD has in mind many primitive style tools and weapons t introduce to the game but at present if we added them everyone would just make them instead of the iron steel ones already in the game.as soon as we have weapon/tool degredation the number of available things will sky rocket to include more primitive ones because then they'll be more in balance cause they'll break faster then steel/iron ones will.
The RD has made a fun and beautiful game, which has attracted some really fine people and I'm enjoying getting to know them. However, the RD also needs to take more account of some basic ideas about how human societies operate.
Currently, you have Joe of Joe's Bakery happily gathering wheat outside, while his spawnlings slave over the wheat-grinding-machine and the bread-baking-machine. Why? Because he holds in his hands his precious and irreplaceable sickle. It has taken him a lifetime to own it. Now you want to break it? In the current circumstances of a moribund economy?
No, what you need to do is make consumption of Joe's bread absolutely necessary for Edwina Evilguts of Castle Steel... not so much for reasons of health as for reasons of status. Then she will pay Joe for his bread and he can buy sickles one after the other and you'll have trade, and then you can start breaking Joe's surplus sickles. If you start beaking things now, old Evilguts--who lives on raw potatos and has never been anywhere near a restaurant anyway--will have even less time to bother with poor Joe, and even less interest in dispensing with her hoarded steel. The problem, you see, is that Edwina has no reason to consume, not that thing's don't break. You have insufficient demand to power the economy.
But I'll return to that--and also how to solve it--in another thread. Meanwhile I still believe this place needs obsidian fast. If you look at the overwhelming votes for stone tools, plus the fact that the above is a much better suggestion, then what further reason is there not to do it asap? It should be mere parameter changes not so?

