Lean-to?

Out-of-character discussion forum for players of Cantr II to discuss new ideas for the development of the Cantr II game.

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department, Game Mechanics (RD)

User avatar
boomhaeur
Posts: 392
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:11 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Lean-to?

Postby boomhaeur » Fri Aug 13, 2004 1:18 pm

Any chance we could get a lean-to shelter in-game? By lean-to I mean basically a small shelter made of branches leaned against a tree.

Enough capacity for one person carrying limited weight (ie. not the full person capcity maybe only a couple thousand grams).

Should take a day's wood or so to make and no tools (just sticks leaned against a tree).

This kind of shelter would at least give some of the explorers a bit of a fighting chance in some of the more hostile areas. I know the goal in some of the new areas was to make it a bit more challenging for explorers but its gotten a bit out of hand. I just had a car do alot of travelling around the Aki island in a boat and at almost every location there was literally 10's of each animal (20 and beyond in many cases).

A lean-to would make quick shelter for an explorer to rest up but still require a) some exposure outside while building it and b) be so small it wouldn't be practical to use as a living space.

It might help balance out the animals vs. human imbalance just a touch without making it swing too far the wrong way.
trage
Posts: 887
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:11 pm

Postby trage » Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:09 pm

I like this idea, it would definately help in hostile places and people wouldn't actually have homes, unless you could build other buildings side it. Which I hope there is some way tomake impossible.
User avatar
Anthony Roberts
Posts: 2578
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:45 pm
Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Postby Anthony Roberts » Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:48 pm

This is exactly the same as the Tent topic.

The Lean-To would be worthless in cost, so then there would be a huge influx of buildings at locations. The more buildings, the more database entries. The more database entries, the more to load. The more to load, the slower the game goes.

Of course, buildings are built all the time. But a building that needs 500 wood and 200 hide or something, will seem astonishing to someone, so they'll be like "Oh my god! I don't care how crappy this is, I want myself a place to stay in that I can call my own!" - And so, a hell of a lot of Lean-To's will appear as people make them. Then there will be the huge amount of extra buildings.

If, however, the Lean-To were able to be dismantled (Much like the Tent being taken apart to be portable), THEN I would gladly add this building. However, I just can't add this, it would severly imbalance the game.

But. If you really, REALLY, want this home, I will be willing to add one, that requires either Iron, or some form of uncommon material (Like, Cotton Cloth or something) - Anything that would need to be acquired from a developed location. This way, those people running around with wood and dead animal carcass can't pop up massive amounts of buildings.

So, here's the proposal:

1) We all wait until buildings have the ability to be dismantled.
2) We nominate that a new building with a developed material can be built.
3) Option 3! Whatever extra proposals you might have...
-- Anthony Roberts
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:16 pm

I hope only certain buildings will be able to be dismantled. I can only imagine the horror of an intelligent raiding party descending upon a town with crowbars.

I agree that lean tos would be too easy to make and overwhelm the database. Making a tent portable and require esoteric materials would be a good soulution. Leather, and oiled leather to keep the weather (so to speak) out, steel or at least iron poles or maybe just tent stakes. And no, no lock.

This is less realistic than a bit of hemp rope and a square of cloth tied to some trees, but, if it can keep animals out, it should be more than that.
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
boomhaeur
Posts: 392
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:11 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Postby boomhaeur » Sat Aug 14, 2004 3:39 am

Anthony - what if rather than a building it was built as a form of protection.

Can protective items such as shields have a different impact depending on the source? (ie. a sbare do all kinds of damage but an animal do none?)

Since tents are portable they should be an item more than a building. If someone has a "tent" in their inventory they could be far more protected form animals than without one...
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Sat Aug 14, 2004 4:30 am

Well, if it was an inventory item, you could use it in a project "Pitching Tent" Then you can go inside and be out of animals way untill you get out and do a project "Breaking Camp"

But this does cause the problem of

"You see a man in his thirties pitching a tent"
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
Anthony Roberts
Posts: 2578
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:45 pm
Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Postby Anthony Roberts » Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:50 pm

No, all impacts are determined the same. With a Wooden Shield, both the Sabre and a Spear will have the same amount of damage resistance. Getting different weapons to have different effects on shilding is something we've nominated for.

For one, adding a button for the item in your inventory would be "Use this [object]", or something like that. Then, pressiung that button would bring up it's listing of tasks you can do, exactly like if you used a machine. In other words, pitching and taking down a tent needs to be -programmed- in. There's no way to do it with current game mechanics.
-- Anthony Roberts
Gunther_01
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Brisebane, Australia
Contact:

Postby Gunther_01 » Sun Aug 15, 2004 8:41 am

Anthony Roberts wrote:This is exactly the same as the Tent topic.

The Lean-To would be worthless in cost, so then there would be a huge influx of buildings at locations. The more buildings, the more database entries. The more database entries, the more to load. The more to load, the slower the game goes.


I disagree.

The original idea of the leanto was to have only enough space for one person, and a few thousand grams of stuff. Thats way too small to have any practical purpose, except as a temporary shelter in undeveloped areas.

Therefore, people would build something thats easy, like a cottage. Something thats relatively cheap, but still have enough space to serve a practical purpose.

Apart from that, I agree with your three points.
TRAMAPOLINE!!!! TRAMAPOLINE!!!
User avatar
Anthony Roberts
Posts: 2578
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:45 pm
Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Postby Anthony Roberts » Sun Aug 15, 2004 5:06 pm

That's a true point. But I still won't add it, unless it has some manufactured material in it... worthless or not, the rest of the buildings require 'work'. This one would need it too.
-- Anthony Roberts
cantrpotatoe
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 4:00 am
Location: Warrensburg , missouri

Postby cantrpotatoe » Sun Aug 15, 2004 8:19 pm

Wouldnt it be easier just to be able to make a pop-up tent? out of ..say.. leather or hide.. you only have to make it once and can take it everywhere. you would be able to pitch it and take it back down.
The Industriallist
Posts: 1862
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:25 pm

Postby The Industriallist » Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:04 pm

But the code for that doesn't exist, so it would go onto the endless and (almost) unmoving programming department list. Thus, options that could be added without new coding were under discussion.
"If I can be a good crackhead, I can be a good Christian"

-A subway preacher
User avatar
Anthony Roberts
Posts: 2578
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:45 pm
Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Postby Anthony Roberts » Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:06 pm

Anthony Roberts wrote:If, however, the Lean-To were able to be dismantled (Much like the Tent being taken apart to be portable), THEN I would gladly add this building. However, I just can't add this, it would severly imbalance the game.


Dismantling is NOT programmed. Until it's programmed, as stated in this quote in a post up above, THEN I'd add such a building. But I can't until then (Unless it has a developed resource in it, as I suggested, but no one seems to want to have that.)
-- Anthony Roberts

Return to “Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest