I propose that we allow people to have a large sack. Yes, I'm sure your dirty mind thinks this is another one of my perverted posts, but alas, you are once again wrong.
The sack will allow anything to be placed in it up to 60,000 grams, the perfect weight for allowing a body to be placed in there. Furthermore, the sack can be dragged and instantly emptied by allowing a person to dump all the items in the bag on the floor. This will allow people to stuff items into the sack, drag the sack to the desired locations, and then dump it all out without having to pursue a million and one clicks in between.
Furthermore, we could have a shoulder sack that allows people to carry anything inside of the sack. This sack will allow people to keep objects they want to hold onto, but hate dropping when they need extra space, such as a million keys. Furthermore, it could hide objects a person is possessing.
A large sack
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department, Game Mechanics (RD)
-
YugoStrikesBack
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:30 am
- Location: Death Star
A large sack
I did it cuz I hate you.
- CrashBlizz
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:41 am
- Location: China
Re: A large sack
YugoStrikesBack wrote:The sack will allow anything to be placed in it up to 60,000 grams, the perfect weight for allowing a body to be placed in there. .
Apart from to hide to identity of a dead body, I don't see the point. Most live ones carry things so would't fit. Dead ones can be dragged anywhere anyway - point?
YugoStrikesBack wrote:This will allow people to stuff items into the sack, drag the sack to the desired locations, and then dump it all out without having to pursue a million and one clicks in between.
Sounds like kidnapping to me...
YugoStrikesBack wrote:Furthermore, we could have a shoulder sack that allows people to carry anything inside of the sack. This sack will allow people to keep objects they want to hold onto, but hate dropping when they need extra space, such as a million keys.
A good idea - wasn't storage of items dropped though due to programming problems???
YugoStrikesBack wrote:Furthermore, it could hide objects a person is possessing.
I agee and think there should be a way to do this without having to drop them on a locked vehicle.
-
Rumaan
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:16 pm
Re: A large sack
The Burlap sack can be changed to hold tools and other stuff. And an empty all function could be added. But I think we also need a function to load a million items into the sack in one go. To prevent thieves from misusing this function we can let only those holding some magic wand have access to this function. The magic wand should itself be very costly to make in terms of resources and time so that ideally only town leaders have access to it. And since it is magic it could disintegrate once it is dropped (so that thieves can't gain it by killing a town leader).
- SekoETC
- Posts: 15526
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: A large sack
The only things holding back storing items in containers are: wanting to take dimensions into account and the possibility of storing an infinite amount of clothes and notes if weight was the only limiting factor.
I think a large sack would be a good idea but 60 kilos sounds pretty huge. If it was actually possible to put corpses in bags then it could be called a body bag and shaped accordingly. It would also be neat if it could be used to kidnap living people but I don't see that happening any time soon. And aren't sacks usually meant to be carried? Maybe there could be one that holds 15 kilos, well, you couldn't lift it when it was full because the weight of the sack would put it over the limit, but you could drag it or carry it while almost full. Or maybe just 14 kilos.
I think a large sack would be a good idea but 60 kilos sounds pretty huge. If it was actually possible to put corpses in bags then it could be called a body bag and shaped accordingly. It would also be neat if it could be used to kidnap living people but I don't see that happening any time soon. And aren't sacks usually meant to be carried? Maybe there could be one that holds 15 kilos, well, you couldn't lift it when it was full because the weight of the sack would put it over the limit, but you could drag it or carry it while almost full. Or maybe just 14 kilos.
Not-so-sad panda
-
Rumaan
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:16 pm
Re: A large sack
Well don't allow notes to be put in a sack because there are already sacks available for notes called Envelopes. In my opinion, clothes should have some weight. In any case, sacks can have a limit on the number of items they can hold.
- joo
- Posts: 5021
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:26 pm
- Location: London, UK
Re: A large sack
Couldn't a character's inventory be thought of as a "sack" in this manner?
- Mr. Bones
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:48 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: A large sack
I would like to see some kind of sack that can conceal things though, there's so many towns now that have suspicious laws, outlawing the carrying of weapons and crowbars. I mean really though, weapon, shield and especially crowbars are like lifelines, who wants to leave that stuff in their cars or boats? Perhaps it could even add slightly to the weight limit of characters. There really is'nt any definition in place for how characters even carry items in the first place, so let's say they're carrying it all with their hands and arms, having a backpack of sorts that could be slung over the shoulders would add more carrying capacity. I don't really think it should be sixty kilos though. Maybe somewhere in the area of an extra fifteen kilos, perhaps.
- Addicted
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:42 pm
- Location: Australia
Re: A large sack
Mr. Bones wrote:I would like to see some kind of sack that can conceal things though, there's so many towns now that have suspicious laws, outlawing the carrying of weapons and crowbars. I mean really though, weapon, shield and especially crowbars are like lifelines, who wants to leave that stuff in their cars or boats? Perhaps it could even add slightly to the weight limit of characters. There really is'nt any definition in place for how characters even carry items in the first place, so let's say they're carrying it all with their hands and arms, having a backpack of sorts that could be slung over the shoulders would add more carrying capacity. I don't really think it should be sixty kilos though. Maybe somewhere in the area of an extra fifteen kilos, perhaps.
In those suspicious towns, you'd just be required to present the bag for a search.
Reveal to me the mysteries
Can you tell me what it means?
Explain these motions and metaphors
Unlock these secrets in me
Describe the vision, the meaning is missing
Won't anybody listen?
Can you tell me what it means?
Explain these motions and metaphors
Unlock these secrets in me
Describe the vision, the meaning is missing
Won't anybody listen?
- Mr. Bones
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:48 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: A large sack
Well technically 15 kilograms is'nt that much weight anyway just thirty some odd pounds. I've concealed thirty pounds of stuff under my clothes before, so why not a small pack that has the same capacity? It's not like it's a hundred pounds of shit that would make that impossible. Basically a concealable small pack.
Or perhaps even a pack that can hold only five kilos that is concealable.
Or perhaps even a pack that can hold only five kilos that is concealable.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
