Thought or Rant of the day!!!

General chitchat, advertisements for other services, and other non-Cantr-related topics

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
Caesar
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 2:45 am
Location: The Netherlands, Europe, Earth, Sol, The Milkyway, Our Galaxy, Time & Space

Postby Caesar » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:04 pm

Normally it takes you no longer than three minutes to reply..

This time it took you over ten minutes while the amount of characters in your posts didn't even double that of an average post.
- Every person lost in war is two too many.
- Respect comes from two sides and must be earned. Nobody has the right to it because of a title, sex, age, race or birth.
- What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
- I believe in True Love, do you?
Rigel Kent
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:42 pm

Postby Rigel Kent » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:30 pm

Playing a game. So exuse the long delays I got to wait till i'l dead.
I'm baaaaaack!
User avatar
Rebma
Posts: 2899
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:47 am
Location: Kitchener, ON

Postby Rebma » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:48 pm

At least you fuckers get notification when your posts are replied to. FUcking months of never getting them :( I'm never in the loop on time.

Reading Dennis L Thombs' "Introduction to Addictive behaviours" for health and human service professionals an for undergraduate and graduate courses on addictive behaviour.

I went into it knowing vaguely about the different models (a.k.a theories) and had a fairly good idea which I believed in. However, the amount of depth this chapter goes into on the disease model alone is insane, to the point where I've now realised it's shit, (for the time being-my mind gets changed back and forth every paragraph :D) and AA and NA's founding principle's are really not valid in any way, shape, or form. I mean, I can get why they'd have thought that in the 80's but nowadays, not so much. This from a prior disease model believer. *sigh* You'd have to read to understand what I mean, because books on theories are always different, especially when they're comparitive of each other, but, this one's tasteful, doesn't even get rude about the immoral-moral models, just factual. So far.
kronos wrote:like a nice trim is totally fine. short, neat. I don't want to be fighting through the forests of fangorn and expecting treebeard to come and show me the way in
User avatar
Caesar
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 2:45 am
Location: The Netherlands, Europe, Earth, Sol, The Milkyway, Our Galaxy, Time & Space

Postby Caesar » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:10 pm

Rigel Kent wrote:Playing a game. So exuse the long delays I got to wait till i'l dead.


Isn't it more worth your time to read a book..?

Besides that.. What game are you playing?
- Every person lost in war is two too many.

- Respect comes from two sides and must be earned. Nobody has the right to it because of a title, sex, age, race or birth.

- What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

- I believe in True Love, do you?
Rigel Kent
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:42 pm

Postby Rigel Kent » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:31 pm

Dont feel like it I finished what I was reading last night.

Feudalism 2. Sort of cool nice and mindless.
I'm baaaaaack!
User avatar
QueenofBlades
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:32 am
Location: Southern East Coast, US

Postby QueenofBlades » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:47 pm

Awww, haha, you guys are so cute! Plonking down philosophy in front of you guys is kind of like setting down a live mouse in the middle of a box of kittens. You kinda bat it around like you're not sure what to do with it, and you look damn cute doing it, but some of you do know what to do with it and then it kinda gets scary and bloody and cool.
But then the ones that don't--I don't think I really need to point fingers here--end up irritating the mouse until it bites them and gives them rabies and they have to be put down and it's really sad.
I'm just sayin'.
Sketchified.
User avatar
chase02
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:13 pm
Contact:

Postby chase02 » Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:21 am

NaruShadow wrote:He makes much more sense in person, trust me lol


You know Rigel offline? That is scary.
Image
Rigel Kent
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:42 pm

Postby Rigel Kent » Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:30 am

Isnt it?
I'm baaaaaack!
Gran
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:53 am

Postby Gran » Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:25 am

QueenofBlades wrote:You kinda bat it around like you're not sure what to do with it, and you look damn cute doing it, but some of you do know what to do with it and then it kinda gets scary and bloody and cool.
But then the ones that don't--I don't think I really need to point fingers here--end up irritating the mouse until it bites them and gives them rabies and they have to be put down and it's really sad.


I laughed out when imagining the literal scene. A delightful metaphor. >D
"Navegar é preciso; viver não é preciso"
User avatar
Ryaga
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:43 am

Postby Ryaga » Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:52 am

Diego wrote:
Grey areas are relative, everyone's got their own ideas of black and white. You're not putting yourself in the grey by defining a line, you're defining your white.
Lines are, essentially, limits--"you can walk down this path, but only up to here, beyond this point, it's bad". I call that bullshit. A good path is good, and the further you go down that path, the better off you are.
That's most obviously not true. I eat simple sugars because I need to sustain the heat within my body. If I eat too many simple sugars, I grow large. Large is bad, heat is great.
Image
User avatar
Rebma
Posts: 2899
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:47 am
Location: Kitchener, ON

Postby Rebma » Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:54 am

GranAttacker wrote:
QueenofBlades wrote:You kinda bat it around like you're not sure what to do with it, and you look damn cute doing it, but some of you do know what to do with it and then it kinda gets scary and bloody and cool.
But then the ones that don't--I don't think I really need to point fingers here--end up irritating the mouse until it bites them and gives them rabies and they have to be put down and it's really sad.


I laughed out when imagining the literal scene. A delightful metaphor. >D

Same, I even imagined each CantrPlayerKitten's colour. :D
kronos wrote:like a nice trim is totally fine. short, neat. I don't want to be fighting through the forests of fangorn and expecting treebeard to come and show me the way in
User avatar
NaruShadow
Posts: 551
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: A hamster wheel somewhere in my mind :D
Contact:

Postby NaruShadow » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:34 am

chase02 wrote:
NaruShadow wrote:He makes much more sense in person, trust me lol


You know Rigel offline? That is scary.


Lol you've no Idea chase...but we've known each other for so long, it's about time one of us killed the other.


....Don't turn around Bren lol
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked in to jet engines... :P
Image
Rigel Kent
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:42 pm

Postby Rigel Kent » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:38 am

hw about you drive up here. Go ahead start you truck up i dare you. and none of this Casino bullshit when the bomb doesnt kill you now this one will take your house as well mahahaha.

Any ways I find it funny I am not banned when i was told I was. I am sure sooner or later I will be...Like I really care. I got a dozen emails if I felt the need to bother you all.
I'm baaaaaack!
rconley
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:24 am

Postby rconley » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:21 am

Rebma19 wrote:Same, I even imagined each CantrPlayerKitten's colour. :D


Dark green and light green?
<Viktor> someone asks my career my answer is "full time cantriian"
Idriveayugo
Posts: 667
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Yugoslavia

Postby Idriveayugo » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:06 am

hj
Last edited by Idriveayugo on Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest