catpurr wrote:Piscator wrote:No, it's that they have been rejected before for a reason I don't quite rember right now. Maybe it should be reconsidered, but we should have a look at the old thread first.
I hope this wasn't the nonsense that some people like to bring up, that computer generated random numbers are actually pseudorandom, and therefore not "true" as in "allowed for online-casinos" random number generation. If thats the case, and I know the people who like to complain about it, its utter nonsense. Normal calls to random() are by far random enough for any normal application/game.
Very true.