Traditional dice

Threads moved from the Suggestions forum after implementation

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
Litchin_flip
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: BFE, Virginia

Postby Litchin_flip » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:28 pm

catpurr wrote:
Piscator wrote:No, it's that they have been rejected before for a reason I don't quite rember right now. Maybe it should be reconsidered, but we should have a look at the old thread first.


I hope this wasn't the nonsense that some people like to bring up, that computer generated random numbers are actually pseudorandom, and therefore not "true" as in "allowed for online-casinos" random number generation. If thats the case, and I know the people who like to complain about it, its utter nonsense. Normal calls to random() are by far random enough for any normal application/game.



Very true.
SIMMONS--SNOWWIS--hmmm interesting don't you think
User avatar
Piscator
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 6843
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Known Space

Postby Piscator » Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:11 am

No, that was not the reason. I agree that this would be pretty ridiculous.

Apparently the suggestion has not been rejected. I found these two threads about this topic:

http://forum.cantr.org/viewtopic.php?t=5432&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
http://forum.cantr.org/viewtopic.php?t=3130&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
Pretty in pink.
Gran
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:53 am

Postby Gran » Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:23 am

There was, if I am not mistaken, a third topic on creating dices, related by a discussion about random number generators in the forum.

I don't see this as very difficult to put into work - or is it? Just a random() there, a result message, new button.
"Navegar é preciso; viver não é preciso"
User avatar
*Wiro
Posts: 5855
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:24 pm

Postby *Wiro » Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:23 am

I realized something unrelated, but what hf said about the notes in envelopes bug...that bug is still around. After four years.

After a brief look it seems to be mostly positive comments. I'll quote some interesting posts to this topic tomorrow.
Read about my characters by following this link.
User avatar
Piscator
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 6843
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:06 pm
Location: Known Space

Postby Piscator » Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:33 am

The only possible argument against this suggestion I can see is that it would produce an awful lot of messages (depending on the game you play). Of course that's not really a problem. People could always go inside.
Pretty in pink.
User avatar
Elros
Posts: 1511
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

Postby Elros » Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:03 am

I really like this idea as well. Being able to gamble away your ship, iron, and clothes would be awesome! :wink:
Every action has a consequence.
User avatar
Litchin_flip
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: BFE, Virginia

Postby Litchin_flip » Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:56 am

*Gives two thumbs up*
SIMMONS--SNOWWIS--hmmm interesting don't you think
User avatar
Chasing Dingoes
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: Scotland

Postby Chasing Dingoes » Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:39 pm

Dice could be made of bone, wood and I suppose stone, clay and metals.

Possibly make a cup and dice game like in pirates of the carrbean. Cups can be made of woods, clays, metals.

Works something like this-
Person with cup and dice shakes the cup and reveal a 2 and a 6.
Another person with cup and dice shakes the cup and and reveals a 5 and a 4.

Regardless loving the dice ideas.
User avatar
Arenti
Posts: 2814
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:31 am
Location: The Netherlands

Postby Arenti » Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:54 pm

I love it..... This would surely help making things more lively.
Drael
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:07 am

Postby Drael » Wed Aug 19, 2009 6:46 am

Lots of good possibilities around this.

Dice are the simplest option.

Theres also variable skill based travel times, games and variable skill based gambling (ie cards, chess or like), strength and skill based competitions (ie sports).

All of which have been suggested, and not entirely regected.
User avatar
*Wiro
Posts: 5855
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:24 pm

Postby *Wiro » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:52 pm

So, accepted?
Read about my characters by following this link.
User avatar
Marian
Posts: 3190
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:16 am

Postby Marian » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:56 pm

I hope so. This is something I've wanted for a long long time, and it seems like it would be so easy to do. :(
User avatar
theguy
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:23 pm

Postby theguy » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:59 pm

catpurr wrote:
Piscator wrote:No, it's that they have been rejected before for a reason I don't quite rember right now. Maybe it should be reconsidered, but we should have a look at the old thread first.


I hope this wasn't the nonsense that some people like to bring up, that computer generated random numbers are actually pseudorandom, and therefore not "true" as in "allowed for online-casinos" random number generation. If thats the case, and I know the people who like to complain about it, its utter nonsense. Normal calls to random() are by far random enough for any normal application/game.


2'ded, seriously its a game, the odds dont have to be up to casino standard. Also I was thinking it might be possible to have dice rolling as an instant project with instant result but would the result have to be on the next project tick if it worked this way?
Blog: http://undercontrol93.blogspot.com/

returner wrote: so I could probably make a Cantr III in my spare time :P

Well where is it?
User avatar
Marian
Posts: 3190
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:16 am

Postby Marian » Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:26 pm

theguy wrote:2'ded, seriously its a game, the odds dont have to be up to casino standard. Also I was thinking it might be possible to have dice rolling as an instant project with instant result but would the result have to be on the next project tick if it worked this way?


There's no reason it needs to be a project, they can just treat it like playing a flute. (only this actually opens up RP possibilities while instruments are just annoying)
User avatar
theguy
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:23 pm

Postby theguy » Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:27 pm

Marian wrote:
theguy wrote:2'ded, seriously its a game, the odds dont have to be up to casino standard. Also I was thinking it might be possible to have dice rolling as an instant project with instant result but would the result have to be on the next project tick if it worked this way?


There's no reason it needs to be a project, they can just treat it like playing a flute. (only this actually opens up RP possibilities while instruments are just annoying)


I was trying to think mechanics, end result would hopefully be the same
Blog: http://undercontrol93.blogspot.com/

returner wrote: so I could probably make a Cantr III in my spare time :P

Well where is it?

Return to “Implemented Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests