Thought or Rant of the day!!!

General chitchat, advertisements for other services, and other non-Cantr-related topics

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
*Wiro
Posts: 5855
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:24 pm

Postby *Wiro » Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:37 pm

._. How are you even supposed to pee when it's sewn shut!? Will they make another hole somewhere or shove some scary device in your behind and make a hole there so you can use it to poop AND pee? :O
Read about my characters by following this link.
User avatar
joo
Posts: 5021
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:26 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby joo » Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:40 pm

Dudel wrote:About the things being sewn up situation. In animals as well as humans it is/was used to prevent infection. I'm almost certain that I would rather have the hole in my penis swen shut then piss blood. Hmmm... well lesser of two evils I sapose. Nothing malishous there, it really is in the best intrest of the animal.

What about the need to urinate?

And in Africa I believe it was done to young girls ritually, not for any medical reasons. I wasn't aware of them sewing the vagina closed, but they did perform a female equivalent of circumcision, which stopped the women from experiencing any pleasure during sex...
User avatar
Dudel
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:21 am

Postby Dudel » Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:42 pm

For a male it would not work because the hole is used for urinating and sex. However for the female they are seperate. The urethra is above the vagina so you can sew up the vagina and still be able to pee.

If ladies I am incorrect, I'm sure I'm not, correct me.
User avatar
joo
Posts: 5021
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:26 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby joo » Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:43 pm

*Wiro wrote:._. How are you even supposed to pee when it's sewn shut!? Will they make another hole somewhere or shove some scary device in your behind and make a hole there so you can use it to poop AND pee? :O

Lol. Vagina 101: it's possible to close the part which is used for penetrative sex, but leaving the urethra opening, which is used to urinate, free.

Edit: here's a handy guide. (WARNING: MATURE CONTENT).
User avatar
*Wiro
Posts: 5855
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:24 pm

Postby *Wiro » Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:51 pm

Bah. Sick. :o No one's touching my vagina or penis. :o
Not to cut things out or sew things shut or take a look in it with some scary thing that goes *click* >: (

Why can't they just leave it alone? :O Oh speaking about stuff like that...

There was some stupid mom who was worried about her SIXTEEN year old daughter being too enthusiastic about some sex-related things. I mean, wtf? She's 16! You can't control her anymore, stupid old boring woman who thinks things are still like how they used to be ages ago. :O
Sure, it's still young, but not too young. As long as she does it safe, why would you give a [beep]!? :O

Cute video time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rNmeXEtT9M
Read about my characters by following this link.
User avatar
joo
Posts: 5021
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:26 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby joo » Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:10 pm

*Wiro wrote:Cute video time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rNmeXEtT9M

Eh, I should always remember to read the video titles before I watch them. I'm beginning to identify a common theme your videos, Wiro. :roll:
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15526
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Postby SekoETC » Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:15 pm

When stitches are used, they leave a small hole to let urine and menstrual blood leak out but still, that doesn't sound hygienic at all. I'd say that the pee hole is technically inside the vagina even though it's close to the entrance, although it's possible that they put the stitches behind that point, but they still need to leave a small hole for menstrual blood in any case.

And Wiro, you can't blame mothers for being worried. I know I'd be if I had a child, even though it has annoyed me how much my mom has fussed over me. Teens don't think very rationally so they can easily get hurt emotionally, not to mention possible physical consequences. I know from personal experience that if you really want to have sex with someone, realizing that neither one has a condom is not enough of a reason to decide not to do it.
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
*Wiro
Posts: 5855
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:24 pm

Postby *Wiro » Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:28 pm

Hmm.. Pretty hard for me to understand considering the fact that I am not the type to just grab someone and push 'em against the wall and have sex.
And yet I also am. I don't understand myself, at all. ._.


But I pretty much try to keep a clear mind and if I were to have sex I'd make sure to have a condom. It probably wouldn't be something too unexpected, allthough it might be. I can imagine that if you're both in the mood it's hard to wait another week. Especially if it's the only day since months that both your parents are out of the house or something like that.

But I can imagine myself not having found someone I love before I am 20, allthough I can also imagine myself finding someone pretty early. In fact, I found "the one" more than once, twice to be exact, but it both never got anywhere.
Once because it was far-away love and once because... dunno, it just didn't feel good anymore after a short while.

Hmph. Love confuzzles me.
Read about my characters by following this link.
User avatar
Dudel
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:21 am

Postby Dudel » Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:44 pm

Love and Sex don't go together. Infact they are controled by seperate parts of the brain. One is strickly biological the other is strickly emotional. When the human feels something bridge between them that is actually a consious choice. Thus making them 100% liable for anything that may or may not happen. When they stay seperate;

The biological can be easily subdued with... aids.

The emotion can be subdued by being smashed in the head for falling for such trickery!

I find myself to be able to stay out of both 'mods' rather easily. My brain is the dominate force in my body. NOTHING ELSE!

You others, I feel sad for. You let your chemicals run your actions before thinking through. That is why you evolved! To be able to use your mind!

This rant was not directed at anyone one here in particular, however it is directed at my sibling. Being gay is fine with me BUT DON'T throw your life away for any form of sex.

DUMBASS!
User avatar
*Wiro
Posts: 5855
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:24 pm

Postby *Wiro » Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:48 pm

I think sex is something that makes love feel even better. You shouldn't use it for anything else than that. (It makes me feel sick thinking about prostitutes who actually sell their body to someone else, bah. Or raping people just because sex is nice.) Sex is nice, but it's meant to make love feel even better. Not because it's nice.

Just my pretty much worthless opinion because I never had sex.
Read about my characters by following this link.
User avatar
joo
Posts: 5021
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:26 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby joo » Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:08 pm

*Wiro wrote:.)

Full stop goes after parenthesis.
User avatar
chase02
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:13 pm
Contact:

Postby chase02 » Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:42 am

joo wrote:WTH? I just spent 20 minutes of my life watching horses running around. *laughs and shakes head* Well good for you. I hope you enjoyed watching those two doing their business. ;)


lol!

No watching involved, just vets, couriers and lots of bills. ;) Entirely non-natural.
User avatar
chase02
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:13 pm
Contact:

Postby chase02 » Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:47 am

SekoETC wrote:Not like they'd allow horses to have normal sex nowadays, it would be a waste of sperm if it all went to one mare. So they have some artificial dummy horse and the stallion mounts that and then they use the sperm to impregnate several horses. I saw in CSI that they tend to stitch up horse pussy to prevent infections and that felt awfully cruel. :(


Woah woah woah.. back up there girl!

There is still plenty of natural breeding done. If you breed thoroughbreds, natural is all you are legally allowed to do (don't ask me why, something to do with overusing the race winners and losing too much genetic diversity?). I'm using the best stallion I can afford, who happens to be located 10,000km away so AI is my only option.

The stitching you refer to - a Caslick procedure - is rarely done. Generally only when the mare is so badly conformed (built/structured) that it is REQUIRED for her to carry to term safely. IMHO mares like that should NEVER be bred! Certainly won't need to in our case.
lordcooper
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:55 am

Postby lordcooper » Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:29 am

joo wrote:
*Wiro wrote:.)

Full stop goes after parenthesis.


No it doesn't.
User avatar
Mr. Black
Posts: 990
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Fighting bandanna-wearing AK-47 firing pickles in Zimbabwe

Postby Mr. Black » Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:34 am

lordcooper wrote:
joo wrote:
*Wiro wrote:.)

Full stop goes after parenthesis.


No it doesn't.


Yes it does. But Joo was just being a grammar Nazi anyway, so go ahead and say it doesn't.
PLAYER STATS

NAME: Mr. Black
AGE: 21
OCCUPATION: Fry-cook, occasional rocker
LIKES: Hard rock, metal, playing both, Cantr, the internet, and whiskey.
HATES: His apartment, lizards, snakes, being told what to do.
STR: -2
AGI: -10
INT: +10
RCK: >9000

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest