Clothing Description Errors
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
- Bowser
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:55 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
Clothing Description Errors
I have taken a sneak peek at a few well dressed people in Cantr, but some are not as well dressed.
They do have on something worth mentioning, but the sentence describing the way they look is not written properly. the syntax or sentence structure is somewhat off.
If you look at someone and see an example of this, could you copy/paste that here?
They do have on something worth mentioning, but the sentence describing the way they look is not written properly. the syntax or sentence structure is somewhat off.
If you look at someone and see an example of this, could you copy/paste that here?
- kroner
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:39 pm
- Location: new jersey...
One of the problems is that it tries to combine each clothing article desription into the same sentence with "and", but some of the descriptions are more than one sentence, or a sentence with multiple clauses and so it gets really weird. I think each clothing article being desribed should start a new sentence to solve this.
edit: not with "and", with a comma.
edit: not with "and", with a comma.
Last edited by kroner on Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DOOM!
- Spectrus_Wolfus
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
*cut*He seems strong, is in his thirties, and is working on project 'Farming to get hemp'. He wears a tall hat, cylindrical in shape, with a brim all the way round, that wobbles and balances precariously on top of the wearers head, a coat of finely woven hemp fiber droops down almost to the knees, fitting tightly around the body, a pair of pants made from a course hemp fibre and a pair of thick hemp gloves that seem designed for hard work and bitter cold, made of a tough looking material.*paste*
looks like soeone played with it or this is a bad example *shrugs*
looks like soeone played with it or this is a bad example *shrugs*
-
David
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 5:50 am
- Location: Maryland/America
- Sho
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 4:05 am
-
Indio no.9
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 10:54 am
- new.vogue.nightmare
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 8:55 am
- Location: Right behind you. No, really.
- Contact:
-
Meh
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:13 pm
- Location: Way away from TRUE staff abuse
- Sho
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 4:05 am
Hey, I'm not even in the Programming Department yet! You fix it!
All the animals seem to have their plurals formed by simply affixing an "s" after the animal name, so I think fixing "sheeps" and "mooses" might be more trouble than it's worth. We have cars that move without fuel, why not creative grammar?
All the animals seem to have their plurals formed by simply affixing an "s" after the animal name, so I think fixing "sheeps" and "mooses" might be more trouble than it's worth. We have cars that move without fuel, why not creative grammar?
-
Indio no.9
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 10:54 am
- Sho
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 4:05 am
- Anthony Roberts
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:45 pm
- Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada
Indio no.9 wrote:Theres actualy quite a few mistakes in Cantr like when it says 5 sheeps when theres no such word as sheeps, and ~if you use a batle to get wood you get 400 g a day' when it should be 'batle axe'.
'Bout this here, it's gonna be hard to fix. They could put %20 between the words so it shows "Battle Axe" but in the inventory, it will end up putting "Battle%20Axe" which is abnormal.
Edit: And, I have to agree on Sho with this one. So what if its sheeps? Or meese? (Which, it should be moose) - Us Canadians go around saying "Eh?" and THAT'S not a word. It's completly fair to make Cantr English a little off. It's not Earth, so it's not Earth English
-- Anthony Roberts
- boomhaeur
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:11 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
With respect to the space rather than use %20 why not use " " in the database entry - it's the proper HTML syntax and it shouldn't affect the database in any way - when it gets rendered back out on the user pages it will display fine. (or will it mess up in drop-downs?)
"That's excatly what I mean. You'd have to disable the "add 's' to animal name" thing for sheep specifically, which would be a bother."
The easiest way would be to have animal names recorded with one field for sigular name and one field for plural and just enter each record - modify the code that add's the extra "s" on the end when numbers are > 1 to look up the plural word instead of adding an "s".
"That's excatly what I mean. You'd have to disable the "add 's' to animal name" thing for sheep specifically, which would be a bother."
The easiest way would be to have animal names recorded with one field for sigular name and one field for plural and just enter each record - modify the code that add's the extra "s" on the end when numbers are > 1 to look up the plural word instead of adding an "s".
- nitefyre
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:29 am
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
- Sho
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 4:05 am
Return to “General Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

