Postby 1959 Apache » Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:04 am
That is impossible to gauge accurately. Back then, I saw the world through a child's eyes. No responsibility or worry.
I do think that living in general was less of a burden than it is now. The population has grown considerably, causing society to become condensed even more into metropolitan areas. Those areas have grown out into what used to be the country. Having spent most of my life in New York City, I am keenly aware of what that means.
There is much less emphasis placed on talent than there was then. Now, you advance through society based in how well you network. The truly talented aren't necessarily in the positions they belong. Some ass-kissing yes man usually is there.
On the other hand, the world of today can be like those days, if you set yourself up to have it that way. I moved far enough away from the city, so that it was like going back in time. In the town here, I can leave the keys in my car, and never worry. I don't have to lock my house when I go out. I only drive cars from the 50's and '60s. So basically, I have the best of both worlds.
But the question was which is better.............for me, I can't say either way. Many things about then are better, but I do happen to like my computer, microwave and color TV. I guess the only things better are the electronic entertainment things, but we did not know what we didn't have then.
And I HATE cel phones. They are becoming the drug of the century!
If you drive an old Chevy, you're all right by me!