Brain Exercise...
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
- Sho
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 4:05 am
- Sparkle
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:19 am
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
- Sparkle
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:19 am
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:08 am
- Location: US of A
- Cdls
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 7:09 pm
- Nakranoth
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:49 am
- Location: What if I were in a hypothetical situation?
- Sparkle
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:19 am
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
All of your answers sound correct, but the answer I was looking for was the one Nakranoth said. "I is used in the alphabet after H"
Your turn Nakranoth. I will post one later on today if you do not want to or if no one else does.

Your turn Nakranoth. I will post one later on today if you do not want to or if no one else does.
a day without cantr, is a day spent in bed convulsing and suffering from withdrawl
- Sparkle
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:19 am
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
Change just one letter in each word to convert these sentences into familiar quotations or phrases.
Ex. Alp roars leap go Rose. (Answer: All roads lead to Rome.)
1. Treat yaks frog vittle scorns grog.
2. Hit bank in horse thaw sis mite.
3. She walks pave cars.
4. In newer gains cut at yours.
5. Zany handy mate eight worn.
6. Hale four came aid vat if top.
Ex. Alp roars leap go Rose. (Answer: All roads lead to Rome.)
1. Treat yaks frog vittle scorns grog.
2. Hit bank in horse thaw sis mite.
3. She walks pave cars.
4. In newer gains cut at yours.
5. Zany handy mate eight worn.
6. Hale four came aid vat if top.
a day without cantr, is a day spent in bed convulsing and suffering from withdrawl
- Bowser
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:55 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
Sparkle wrote:
1. Treat yaks frog vittle scorns grog.
2. Hit bank in horse thaw sis mite.
3. She walks pave cars.
4. In newer gains cut at yours.
5. Zany handy mate eight worn.
6. Hale four came aid vat if top.
#2 - His bark is worse than his bite
#4 - It never rains but it pours
#5 - Many hands make light work
I'll leave the other half for everyone else
Homer wrote: "Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals ... except the weasel. "
- deadboy
- Posts: 1488
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:41 pm
- Location: England
- deadboy
- Posts: 1488
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:41 pm
- Location: England
- deadboy
- Posts: 1488
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:41 pm
- Location: England
- Sparkle
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 2:19 am
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
- deadboy
- Posts: 1488
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:41 pm
- Location: England
Just a little one from me. On a table, are placed four cards of which have a number on one side and a letter on the other. So say if you had a card that was a 6, on the other side there would be a letter, say B. Their face values are as follows:
A G 7 3
You are given this rule: "Any card with an A on one side will have a 3 on the other". How many of these cards, and which of these cards do you need to flip over to test if this rule is correct?
EDIT: Oh yeah, and tell me why as well
A G 7 3
You are given this rule: "Any card with an A on one side will have a 3 on the other". How many of these cards, and which of these cards do you need to flip over to test if this rule is correct?
EDIT: Oh yeah, and tell me why as well
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we" - George W. Bush
- Sho
- Posts: 1732
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 4:05 am
Two cards: the card with an A and the card with a 7.
The A would contradict the rule if the number was anything but a 3. The G is not relevant, since it does not have an A. The 7 would disprove the rule if the other side was an A. The 3 is not relevant, since whether or not the letter is an A it does not contradict the rule.
Symbolic logic trick to make things clearer: ~(P->Q) is equivalent to P^~Q. So all that is necessary to prove the rule is to eliminate any possibility of a card that has an A and not a 3.
The A would contradict the rule if the number was anything but a 3. The G is not relevant, since it does not have an A. The 7 would disprove the rule if the other side was an A. The 3 is not relevant, since whether or not the letter is an A it does not contradict the rule.
Symbolic logic trick to make things clearer: ~(P->Q) is equivalent to P^~Q. So all that is necessary to prove the rule is to eliminate any possibility of a card that has an A and not a 3.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest