Cantr items graphics

[wichita]

There shouldn't be discussion here.
Put it plainly:
These purists would want the map gone.. and the little picture of your area. And all the buttons, so it's just links and words to click.

So..

In almost 5 years, I have neve read anywhere of a purist movement to remove the map or pretty forest pictures.

You condemn this secret non-graphical purist group, yet you subscribe to the censorship clan and believe things should not be discussed. For shame!

Nick got pissed at me when I used the forest picture as exhibit A to prove the existence of sunlight in Cantr.

[N-Aldwitch]

There shouldn't be discussion here.
Put it plainly:
These purists would want the map gone.. and the little picture of your area. And all the buttons, so it's just links and words to click.

So..

In almost 5 years, I have neve read anywhere of a purist movement to remove the map or pretty forest pictures.

You condemn this secret non-graphical purist group, yet you subscribe to the censorship clan and believe things should not be discussed. For shame!

Essentially, I mean.

Essentially purists would desire that.

[Mykey]

I suggest you to visit a site on which there are many articles on this question.

[Jos Elkink]

Guys, we can all see the discussion above - if you want to reply to a very specific point someone made, it's useful quoting, but it's just a dialogue, why quote the above post??

Besides, it's a rather pointless/empty discussion, but that's another matter ...

[Bowser]

Nick got pissed at me when I used the forest picture as exhibit A to prove the existence of sunlight in Cantr.

but the purist would use the embroidered bracers description to prove a sun exists because it describes how the sun reflects off the shiney metal.

... and I used the pictures of the mountains once to prove their was snow.

... and pointless/useless discussions are usually the ones I have input on.