Nalaris wrote:But the United States dollar could never come to be if it wasn't backed by a resource. Because the United States dollar came to be accepted, the gold backing could be taken away.
Yes, currencies were backed in historical times. You must bear in mind also that today only a fraction of
money is actually
coinage. Most of it is in the form of demand deposits, savings accounts, time deposits, money-market accounts, and money-market funds. In other words, elecronic data, mostly. There is in fact insufficient combined gold and silver on earth to back the modern world currencies.
For the historical kind of metal
coinage to work in Cantr, you'd have to satisfy the requirements (1) convenience of handling, (2) durability, (3) divisibility, and (3) high intrinsic value. This is the standard definition in Economics. Currently, coins are less convenient to handle than "x grams of y", there is no difference in durability (raw potatoes stored inside will last just as long!), coins are
less divisible than any other kind of resource, and finally the cost of making them is still too high relative to the intrinsic value of the metal. So Cantrian coinage fails
all requirements of the definition.
And yes, fiat currencies could certainly be imposed by the usual Cantrian village tyrants.

However, without wider acceptance they could only be used for local things, like the payment of wages. However, since said tyrants don't pay wages anyhow, they would just be making work for themselves. There are other scams for extracting surplus from people than introducing a fiat currency.
