Michael Jackson

General chitchat, advertisements for other services, and other non-Cantr-related topics

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

Do you believe Michael Jackson is innocent?

Yes - Without a shadow of a doubt
3
10%
Yeah - I think so
2
6%
Maybe/Don't care
11
35%
No - He is up to something
15
48%
 
Total votes: 31
User avatar
Darth Tiberius
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Plymouth, England

Michael Jackson

Postby Darth Tiberius » Mon Jan 19, 2004 5:58 pm

I just wanna see what people think about this. I believe without a shadow of a doubt that Michael is innocent. I waana see who agrees with me. The truth will reveal that he is innocent.
All hail his Purple Majesty!!!
rklenseth
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am

Postby rklenseth » Mon Jan 19, 2004 7:21 pm

I have yet to see the evidence against Michael Jackson but I would point out that why would an innocent man pay millions of dollars to his last accuser if he wasn't guilty of the crime? Sounds rather fishy to me. Paying someone to shut up to get out of going to court over something as bad as child molestation doesn't seem like the actions of an innocent man.

I also like how Jackson's camp keep accusing the family of wanting money from them when the family already refused millions of dollars to settle the case out of court and that this is a criminal case, not civil, so if the family of the accused victim wins and Jackson is found guilty then the family won't get any money.

As I said, I haven't seen or heard the evidence yet so I'm not going to say one way or another whether or not he is guilty but the police seem pretty sure they found something damning after raiding his Neverland Ranch the day before they put out an arrest warrant for him. Usually the police would wait weeks or even months to look over the evidence they found and make sure it is the real thing but whatever they found at his ranch was enough for them to issue an arrest warrant the next day which is very rare unless something really damning was found.
Ash
Posts: 693
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: England

Postby Ash » Mon Jan 19, 2004 7:51 pm

Well i think he is guilty, 100% of the way. Although i have not seen any evidence, i still beleive that he is, aswell with what RKL said 'Paying off the millions for that kid to keep quite' VERY dodgy, but then again, perhaps a publicity problem, but bad publicity is as good as any so he shouldn't have to pay anything, unless he has something to hide. He is also a liar, i think that he is just trying to get sympathy, but it just turns against him. He said : 'The police manhandled him, causing a dislocated shoulder' Yet he walks down the stairs flapping the supposed dislocated shoulder about, and he had bruises on his arm, wht do you expect, with all that rubber, the man is fragile, anything could of caused that, he could of done that himself!

He says also : 'I sleep on the floor when a child sleeps in my bed'
I mean who can beleive him, although it would be hard to get evidence about this it would seem that toughts on that could be 50/50.

Also, one of his freinds was on TV (GMTV, UK) He said : 'Whenever Micheal has children in his house that he keep all of his doors open' & 'That he would feel safe his own children to be there without him there, just alone with Micheal'

But to be honest i think that he has a couple of lose screws, i think he needs some councilling or something, what with all that he has done, hanging that poor baby off the balcony, and covering up his childrens faces all the time, they have nothing to hide, and with him wearing his medical masks and that. I know that i am going a bit deeper here but i feel strongly about this.



<b> I will put a bit more here later.. my fingers are sore </b> :roll:
User avatar
Báng
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Tyrone, Ireland

Postby Báng » Mon Jan 19, 2004 7:55 pm

Aw the poor guys gone in the head..............good music though.
People don't change....perceptions do.

'Gabriel Xavi'
Ash
Posts: 693
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: England

Postby Ash » Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:05 pm

GRRRRRRRRR....

Micheal Jackson -- 'Black or White'

May i just recall a simple sentence that he sings..

'Doesn't matter if your black or white' ( i am gald you can't hear me.. )

Then why the FU*K did he change the coulour of his skin..

I could just like to slap himm :evil: GRRRRR that man get's me so wound up..
west
Posts: 4649
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm

Postby west » Mon Jan 19, 2004 10:00 pm

Think he's just a deeply disturbed guy who never really grew up. Don't think he's necessarily a child molester.

He has all sorts of psychological problemses.
I'm not dead; I'm dormant.
Missy
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 9:12 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Missy » Mon Jan 19, 2004 10:09 pm

lol While I don' t know if he is guilty or not, I tend to lean toward not guilty. While Im a hypocrite because I'd not send my daughter to his house BUT that goes without saying. I'd never send my daughter to an older mans house unattended PERIOD. I don't care if you're Michael Jackson or the POPE or avg joe on the st. Never would send my child off to someones house I did not know.

I think the fact in the last case he did pay the people in a settlement ;SETS him up as an easy target this time. Majority wouldn't think he was innocent because of it, and know barely anyone else will either.

I think it is awful funny how months before he was judged by half the world about the dangling baby incident, then suddenly WHAM, they put these charges forth. SOMEONE knows how to pull strings.

Frankly I'm tired of hearing it, and I think public opinion sways the opinion of people on the jury wheather they claim they know nothing of him or not. I do not think it's fair to try him in the public eye. I do not think it is fair of the media to exploit this case for either side. And I think he should be treated just as any other suspected criminal would be. I don't hold sympathy for the man, nor did I when he gave that speech about the police photographing his body years ago. He shouldn't put himself into positions where persons might think he is doing something harmful to children, and he wouldn't have to endure this oh so horrible process.

While I also wonder...if I was accused of being guilty of something, would I step down and give up with out a fight? I'd do whatever it took to prove my innocence. So maybe thats why he still insists on having children over to nevernever land.

*Shrugs* Don't know. But I'd like to "think" he's not guilty because thats just who I am....Overly trusting until hard facts are presented to prove otherwise.
User avatar
Cheshierekat
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 4:40 am
Location: Somewhere in the Amazon

Postby Cheshierekat » Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:52 am

I know it's wrong to judge people by their appearance, but he is kind of scary. Did you see his mug shot? :shock:
When people tell me that great minds think alike, all I can do is look at them and think "oh you dirty, dirty bastard"
grayjaket
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 3:16 am
Location: Kentucky

Postby grayjaket » Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:57 am

Yes, scary lol. I think he's guilty. I mean seriously...he's not really the most moral guy around...no famous person is. And he's a little stranger than most...
I just can't stop coming back....
User avatar
Bowser
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:55 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

Postby Bowser » Tue Jan 20, 2004 1:15 am

Children don't need friends that are adults. Children do not need to have sleep-overs with adults. Even innocent things are inappropriate in certain situations.... although I doubt the innocence of the things that have occured.

Adults that befriend children because the child needs a male role model is a different stroy, its for the good of the child. Jackson's motivation is not centered the what the child needs, but to fulfill some need he has to be with children.

I'll wait to see the evidence before I pass judgement, but in my opinion, Jackson is a freak.
west
Posts: 4649
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm

Postby west » Tue Jan 20, 2004 1:31 am

No argument there.


Also, I have a dog named Bowser.
I'm not dead; I'm dormant.
User avatar
thingnumber2
Posts: 661
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:31 am
Location: TN
Contact:

Postby thingnumber2 » Tue Jan 20, 2004 1:39 am

umm...look at the guy, just look at him...what kind of parent leaves there kids with a guy like that?
User avatar
ephiroll
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
Location: here and there
Contact:

Postby ephiroll » Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:09 am

There is no doubt in my mind that he's up to something, if he is so innocent (like Richard also pointed out) why the hell did he pay so much money to have things shutup years ago when he first got in trouble? And if he actally isn't guiltly of molestation he's just pulling this crap to get exposer, like with the BS about being manhandled during his arrest, it would take an incrediably STUPID cop to do that to someone as noteable as Jackson. Personnally I hope he gets sent away for the max, 20 years, not that he would last more then a week in any real prison before he got shanked.
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
User avatar
Darth Tiberius
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Plymouth, England

Postby Darth Tiberius » Tue Jan 20, 2004 1:23 pm

First thing! He did not change the color of his skin. It was a disease that creates white patches. It became to hard eventually to cover it with black makeup so he had to use white. He DID NOT change the color of his skin.

Secondly he is a wonderful parent. He got carried away when the baby dangling incident happened. His kids are happy

Also under hypnosis he was asked whertther he did anything improper to kids. He said definately not. He asked why he paid the previod case off. He said it seemed like the easiest thing to do.

Lastly, he is the king of pop and everyone should leave him alone so he can do what he wants.
All hail his Purple Majesty!!!
Ash
Posts: 693
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: England

Postby Ash » Tue Jan 20, 2004 7:37 pm

Well looks like the people have an argument on there case now.. ok.. here i go..

Darth Tiberius wrote:First thing! He did not change the color of his skin. It was a disease that creates white patches. It became to hard eventually to cover it with black makeup so he had to use white. He DID NOT change the color of his skin.


Well i can't say wether that is true, i don't know, i might be wrong, but why does that conclude for all of the other plastic surgery? That was not needed because of this 'Disease' (BTW i've no doubt that this didn't happen, but just i have never seen anything saying OR suggesting that this is correct) with the nose, what was wrong with his nose before.. and i will not accept the point that he had a 'black person' nose. (No offence intended, just being on the safe side)


Darth Tiberius wrote:Secondly he is a wonderful parent. He got carried away when the baby dangling incident happened. His kids are happy


Well, the baby dangling, that is just sick, why the heel was he needed to do that? His kids? HAPPY?? would you be happy if your parents covered you up every time you went anywhere? Would you not think that you were doing something wrong, or have something wrong with you, i think it's terrible, they will grow up like that they will know no different when they are older.. but grow to learn that there dad is a wierdo.


Darth Tiberius wrote:Also under hypnosis he was asked whertther he did anything improper to kids. He said definately not. He asked why he paid the previod case off. He said it seemed like the easiest thing to do.


Well this is simple....

Bollox

Sorry if anyone was offended, but were you there watching him being 'hypnotised' there is no way to suggest he was hypnotised, and videos, voice recordings, written information, don't mean bollox (Said it once say it a million times).. to be honest, i don't think he was hypnotised..


quote="Darth Tiberius"]Lastly, he is the king of pop and everyone should leave him alone so he can do what he wants.[/quote]

King of Freaks.






Also, just saying, don't take none of this personally.. :?

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests