Michael Jackson
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
- Darth Tiberius
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:06 am
- Location: Plymouth, England
Michael Jackson
I just wanna see what people think about this. I believe without a shadow of a doubt that Michael is innocent. I waana see who agrees with me. The truth will reveal that he is innocent.
All hail his Purple Majesty!!!
-
- Posts: 4736
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 12:46 am
I have yet to see the evidence against Michael Jackson but I would point out that why would an innocent man pay millions of dollars to his last accuser if he wasn't guilty of the crime? Sounds rather fishy to me. Paying someone to shut up to get out of going to court over something as bad as child molestation doesn't seem like the actions of an innocent man.
I also like how Jackson's camp keep accusing the family of wanting money from them when the family already refused millions of dollars to settle the case out of court and that this is a criminal case, not civil, so if the family of the accused victim wins and Jackson is found guilty then the family won't get any money.
As I said, I haven't seen or heard the evidence yet so I'm not going to say one way or another whether or not he is guilty but the police seem pretty sure they found something damning after raiding his Neverland Ranch the day before they put out an arrest warrant for him. Usually the police would wait weeks or even months to look over the evidence they found and make sure it is the real thing but whatever they found at his ranch was enough for them to issue an arrest warrant the next day which is very rare unless something really damning was found.
I also like how Jackson's camp keep accusing the family of wanting money from them when the family already refused millions of dollars to settle the case out of court and that this is a criminal case, not civil, so if the family of the accused victim wins and Jackson is found guilty then the family won't get any money.
As I said, I haven't seen or heard the evidence yet so I'm not going to say one way or another whether or not he is guilty but the police seem pretty sure they found something damning after raiding his Neverland Ranch the day before they put out an arrest warrant for him. Usually the police would wait weeks or even months to look over the evidence they found and make sure it is the real thing but whatever they found at his ranch was enough for them to issue an arrest warrant the next day which is very rare unless something really damning was found.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 8:15 pm
- Location: England
Well i think he is guilty, 100% of the way. Although i have not seen any evidence, i still beleive that he is, aswell with what RKL said 'Paying off the millions for that kid to keep quite' VERY dodgy, but then again, perhaps a publicity problem, but bad publicity is as good as any so he shouldn't have to pay anything, unless he has something to hide. He is also a liar, i think that he is just trying to get sympathy, but it just turns against him. He said : 'The police manhandled him, causing a dislocated shoulder' Yet he walks down the stairs flapping the supposed dislocated shoulder about, and he had bruises on his arm, wht do you expect, with all that rubber, the man is fragile, anything could of caused that, he could of done that himself!
He says also : 'I sleep on the floor when a child sleeps in my bed'
I mean who can beleive him, although it would be hard to get evidence about this it would seem that toughts on that could be 50/50.
Also, one of his freinds was on TV (GMTV, UK) He said : 'Whenever Micheal has children in his house that he keep all of his doors open' & 'That he would feel safe his own children to be there without him there, just alone with Micheal'
But to be honest i think that he has a couple of lose screws, i think he needs some councilling or something, what with all that he has done, hanging that poor baby off the balcony, and covering up his childrens faces all the time, they have nothing to hide, and with him wearing his medical masks and that. I know that i am going a bit deeper here but i feel strongly about this.
<b> I will put a bit more here later.. my fingers are sore </b>
He says also : 'I sleep on the floor when a child sleeps in my bed'
I mean who can beleive him, although it would be hard to get evidence about this it would seem that toughts on that could be 50/50.
Also, one of his freinds was on TV (GMTV, UK) He said : 'Whenever Micheal has children in his house that he keep all of his doors open' & 'That he would feel safe his own children to be there without him there, just alone with Micheal'
But to be honest i think that he has a couple of lose screws, i think he needs some councilling or something, what with all that he has done, hanging that poor baby off the balcony, and covering up his childrens faces all the time, they have nothing to hide, and with him wearing his medical masks and that. I know that i am going a bit deeper here but i feel strongly about this.
<b> I will put a bit more here later.. my fingers are sore </b>

- Báng
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Tyrone, Ireland
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 8:15 pm
- Location: England
GRRRRRRRRR....
Micheal Jackson -- 'Black or White'
May i just recall a simple sentence that he sings..
'Doesn't matter if your black or white' ( i am gald you can't hear me.. )
Then why the FU*K did he change the coulour of his skin..
I could just like to slap himm
GRRRRR that man get's me so wound up..
Micheal Jackson -- 'Black or White'
May i just recall a simple sentence that he sings..
'Doesn't matter if your black or white' ( i am gald you can't hear me.. )
Then why the FU*K did he change the coulour of his skin..
I could just like to slap himm

-
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm
-
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 9:12 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
lol While I don' t know if he is guilty or not, I tend to lean toward not guilty. While Im a hypocrite because I'd not send my daughter to his house BUT that goes without saying. I'd never send my daughter to an older mans house unattended PERIOD. I don't care if you're Michael Jackson or the POPE or avg joe on the st. Never would send my child off to someones house I did not know.
I think the fact in the last case he did pay the people in a settlement ;SETS him up as an easy target this time. Majority wouldn't think he was innocent because of it, and know barely anyone else will either.
I think it is awful funny how months before he was judged by half the world about the dangling baby incident, then suddenly WHAM, they put these charges forth. SOMEONE knows how to pull strings.
Frankly I'm tired of hearing it, and I think public opinion sways the opinion of people on the jury wheather they claim they know nothing of him or not. I do not think it's fair to try him in the public eye. I do not think it is fair of the media to exploit this case for either side. And I think he should be treated just as any other suspected criminal would be. I don't hold sympathy for the man, nor did I when he gave that speech about the police photographing his body years ago. He shouldn't put himself into positions where persons might think he is doing something harmful to children, and he wouldn't have to endure this oh so horrible process.
While I also wonder...if I was accused of being guilty of something, would I step down and give up with out a fight? I'd do whatever it took to prove my innocence. So maybe thats why he still insists on having children over to nevernever land.
*Shrugs* Don't know. But I'd like to "think" he's not guilty because thats just who I am....Overly trusting until hard facts are presented to prove otherwise.
I think the fact in the last case he did pay the people in a settlement ;SETS him up as an easy target this time. Majority wouldn't think he was innocent because of it, and know barely anyone else will either.
I think it is awful funny how months before he was judged by half the world about the dangling baby incident, then suddenly WHAM, they put these charges forth. SOMEONE knows how to pull strings.
Frankly I'm tired of hearing it, and I think public opinion sways the opinion of people on the jury wheather they claim they know nothing of him or not. I do not think it's fair to try him in the public eye. I do not think it is fair of the media to exploit this case for either side. And I think he should be treated just as any other suspected criminal would be. I don't hold sympathy for the man, nor did I when he gave that speech about the police photographing his body years ago. He shouldn't put himself into positions where persons might think he is doing something harmful to children, and he wouldn't have to endure this oh so horrible process.
While I also wonder...if I was accused of being guilty of something, would I step down and give up with out a fight? I'd do whatever it took to prove my innocence. So maybe thats why he still insists on having children over to nevernever land.
*Shrugs* Don't know. But I'd like to "think" he's not guilty because thats just who I am....Overly trusting until hard facts are presented to prove otherwise.
- Cheshierekat
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 4:40 am
- Location: Somewhere in the Amazon
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 3:16 am
- Location: Kentucky
- Bowser
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:55 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
Children don't need friends that are adults. Children do not need to have sleep-overs with adults. Even innocent things are inappropriate in certain situations.... although I doubt the innocence of the things that have occured.
Adults that befriend children because the child needs a male role model is a different stroy, its for the good of the child. Jackson's motivation is not centered the what the child needs, but to fulfill some need he has to be with children.
I'll wait to see the evidence before I pass judgement, but in my opinion, Jackson is a freak.
Adults that befriend children because the child needs a male role model is a different stroy, its for the good of the child. Jackson's motivation is not centered the what the child needs, but to fulfill some need he has to be with children.
I'll wait to see the evidence before I pass judgement, but in my opinion, Jackson is a freak.
-
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm
- thingnumber2
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:31 am
- Location: TN
- Contact:
- ephiroll
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
- Location: here and there
- Contact:
There is no doubt in my mind that he's up to something, if he is so innocent (like Richard also pointed out) why the hell did he pay so much money to have things shutup years ago when he first got in trouble? And if he actally isn't guiltly of molestation he's just pulling this crap to get exposer, like with the BS about being manhandled during his arrest, it would take an incrediably STUPID cop to do that to someone as noteable as Jackson. Personnally I hope he gets sent away for the max, 20 years, not that he would last more then a week in any real prison before he got shanked.
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
- Darth Tiberius
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:06 am
- Location: Plymouth, England
First thing! He did not change the color of his skin. It was a disease that creates white patches. It became to hard eventually to cover it with black makeup so he had to use white. He DID NOT change the color of his skin.
Secondly he is a wonderful parent. He got carried away when the baby dangling incident happened. His kids are happy
Also under hypnosis he was asked whertther he did anything improper to kids. He said definately not. He asked why he paid the previod case off. He said it seemed like the easiest thing to do.
Lastly, he is the king of pop and everyone should leave him alone so he can do what he wants.
Secondly he is a wonderful parent. He got carried away when the baby dangling incident happened. His kids are happy
Also under hypnosis he was asked whertther he did anything improper to kids. He said definately not. He asked why he paid the previod case off. He said it seemed like the easiest thing to do.
Lastly, he is the king of pop and everyone should leave him alone so he can do what he wants.
All hail his Purple Majesty!!!
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 8:15 pm
- Location: England
Well looks like the people have an argument on there case now.. ok.. here i go..
Well i can't say wether that is true, i don't know, i might be wrong, but why does that conclude for all of the other plastic surgery? That was not needed because of this 'Disease' (BTW i've no doubt that this didn't happen, but just i have never seen anything saying OR suggesting that this is correct) with the nose, what was wrong with his nose before.. and i will not accept the point that he had a 'black person' nose. (No offence intended, just being on the safe side)
Well, the baby dangling, that is just sick, why the heel was he needed to do that? His kids? HAPPY?? would you be happy if your parents covered you up every time you went anywhere? Would you not think that you were doing something wrong, or have something wrong with you, i think it's terrible, they will grow up like that they will know no different when they are older.. but grow to learn that there dad is a wierdo.
Well this is simple....
Bollox
Sorry if anyone was offended, but were you there watching him being 'hypnotised' there is no way to suggest he was hypnotised, and videos, voice recordings, written information, don't mean bollox (Said it once say it a million times).. to be honest, i don't think he was hypnotised..
quote="Darth Tiberius"]Lastly, he is the king of pop and everyone should leave him alone so he can do what he wants.[/quote]
King of Freaks.
Also, just saying, don't take none of this personally..
Darth Tiberius wrote:First thing! He did not change the color of his skin. It was a disease that creates white patches. It became to hard eventually to cover it with black makeup so he had to use white. He DID NOT change the color of his skin.
Well i can't say wether that is true, i don't know, i might be wrong, but why does that conclude for all of the other plastic surgery? That was not needed because of this 'Disease' (BTW i've no doubt that this didn't happen, but just i have never seen anything saying OR suggesting that this is correct) with the nose, what was wrong with his nose before.. and i will not accept the point that he had a 'black person' nose. (No offence intended, just being on the safe side)
Darth Tiberius wrote:Secondly he is a wonderful parent. He got carried away when the baby dangling incident happened. His kids are happy
Well, the baby dangling, that is just sick, why the heel was he needed to do that? His kids? HAPPY?? would you be happy if your parents covered you up every time you went anywhere? Would you not think that you were doing something wrong, or have something wrong with you, i think it's terrible, they will grow up like that they will know no different when they are older.. but grow to learn that there dad is a wierdo.
Darth Tiberius wrote:Also under hypnosis he was asked whertther he did anything improper to kids. He said definately not. He asked why he paid the previod case off. He said it seemed like the easiest thing to do.
Well this is simple....
Bollox
Sorry if anyone was offended, but were you there watching him being 'hypnotised' there is no way to suggest he was hypnotised, and videos, voice recordings, written information, don't mean bollox (Said it once say it a million times).. to be honest, i don't think he was hypnotised..
quote="Darth Tiberius"]Lastly, he is the king of pop and everyone should leave him alone so he can do what he wants.[/quote]
King of Freaks.
Also, just saying, don't take none of this personally..

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests