cantr go 3-d

[fishfin]

and thus I say NO 3D!!! I don't want idiotic bad spelling silly 13 year olds on the forums!!!

wat bout idiotc bad speeling 14 yr olds?

n in game:

u c a man in his 20 say:"ths gam nt fun how do u kll some1"

That's why I say no to Cant in 3D unless there is still a text version of it that cool people can play.

[The Sociologist]

and thus I say NO 3D!!! I don't want idiotic bad spelling silly 13 year olds on the forums!!!(It's like the imagration debait, isn't it?)

I was 13 when I first came on the forum, but I spell good, and I don't think I'm very idiotic, and I'm 14 now, so does that make me ok?

I never quite know what to make of Pie. Was that intended to be ironic? "Imagration debait"??? This is surely intentional nonsense, is it not?

Any case, there's a huuuge difference between intellectual age and age by birthday, and most people here would be towards the top end, ie higher IQ. In fact the younger the more likely I'd say.

Which does tend to prove the case against a 3D Cantr. It also seems from the voting that everyone's pretty much figured that out.

That said, we do sometimes overdo the snobbishness about spelling. Why shouldn't a l33t culture develop somewhere? Cantr is all about text and it's just a different way of "doing" text.

To my mind, all these are very different concepts: "idiotic" "bad spelling" "silly" "13 years old".

[Joshuamonkey]

You're good at keeping your name.

[Valsum]

Indeed.