Suggestions: Project having sex.

General out-of-character discussion among players of Cantr II.

Moderators: Players Department, Public Relations Department

Do you want sex to be added to Cantr?

Yes
12
33%
No
24
67%
 
Total votes: 36
User avatar
Mykey
Posts: 954
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Berne, IN

:

Postby Mykey » Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:11 am

It is very a pity to me, I can help nothing to you. But it is assured, that you will find the correct decision. Do not despair.
Last edited by Mykey on Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Solfius
Posts: 3144
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm

Postby Solfius » Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:13 am

Sunni Daez wrote:There is a difference between sex.. and the project for creating cantrian life.... Sex doees NOT need to be a project >.<


I agree.

I think procreation needs to be in game, but sex on its own is unnecessary
User avatar
Mykey
Posts: 954
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Berne, IN

:

Postby Mykey » Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:21 am

Quite right! I think, what is it good idea.
Last edited by Mykey on Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
PRUT
Posts: 826
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: Poland

Postby PRUT » Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:36 am

I voted "yes"!
:lol:

Maybe all that voted "no" don't like sex also in RL?
I'm really sorry :twisted:
User avatar
Dee
Posts: 1985
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 8:06 am

Postby Dee » Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:49 am

I voted no.

We're not playing The Sims 2 here, where you can 'Wohoo' or 'Try for a baby'..

Although, the 'Try for a Baby' option is not bad...

But sex should be RP'ed.
User avatar
Mykey
Posts: 954
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Berne, IN

:

Postby Mykey » Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:31 pm

What can he mean?
Last edited by Mykey on Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
goitre
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:09 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby goitre » Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:37 pm

This is a family game! Can't you just hold hands or something?
User avatar
Mykey
Posts: 954
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Berne, IN

:

Postby Mykey » Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:57 pm

It agree, this idea is necessary just by the way
Last edited by Mykey on Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Gender
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:02 am

Postby Gender » Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:09 pm

I voted no.

X: let's make some love.
Y: ok.
*you see X and Y have sex with each other*.
Y. ok, thank you, bye...

If there was some kind of activity, like <having>, it would be easy to be trapped into a routine. It is not a great idea.

On the other hand, I'm not against RP'ed sex. Although I wouldn't try. :)
User avatar
Slowness_Incarnate
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:19 am
Location: Lalaland

Postby Slowness_Incarnate » Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:19 pm

I voted No on this one, the sex is already roleplayed. The baby notion is amusing..but I think it will take quite some time to come around anyway.
User avatar
SekoETC
Posts: 15526
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:07 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Postby SekoETC » Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:54 pm

George: Uh, Mr. President, Sir. People are becoming a bit... confused by
the way your and your opponent are, well, constantly holding
hands.
Kang: We are merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think
of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it.
-- "Treehouse of Horror VII"
Not-so-sad panda
User avatar
goitre
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:09 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby goitre » Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:28 pm

Gender wrote:I voted no.

X: let's make some love.
Y: ok.
*you see X and Y have sex with each other*.
Y. ok, thank you, bye...

If there was some kind of activity, like <having>, it would be easy to be trapped into a routine. It is not a great idea.

On the other hand, I'm not against RP'ed sex. Although I wouldn't try. :)


And then they'd boast about it on the forums, much like the frequent "my character has killed n others," "well my character has killed n+1 others," etc..
west
Posts: 4649
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm

Postby west » Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:54 am

PRUT wrote:I voted "yes"!
:lol:

Maybe all that voted "no" don't like sex also in RL?
I'm really sorry :twisted:


Maybe those that voted "no" actually have sex in real life, eh?

I'm not sorry at all. :wink:
I'm not dead; I'm dormant.
Rustoleum
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 1:47 am

Postby Rustoleum » Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:26 am

I would only agree to this if hockey masks and machetes are added.

Besides, my characters fall asleep enough as it is without having to RP the aftermath.
west
Posts: 4649
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm

Postby west » Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:09 am

Rustoleum wrote:I would only agree to this if hockey masks and machetes are added.

Besides, my characters fall asleep enough as it is without having to RP the aftermath.


Rustoleum is my new hero.

Project having sex has finished (unsuccessfully)

A man in his twenties says to you, "Sorry 'bout that. *looks apologetic*"

A man in his twenties falls asleep.
I'm not dead; I'm dormant.

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest