Project Having sex

[west]

(hey, they're like bunnies)

Bunnies squeak?

[Zanthos]

no, they do it alot (it was in relation to the number of days they were going at it, not the noise)

[Sunni Daez]

again this is utterlly ....not necessary

(stupid type-o's

[Zanthos]

that was exactly what I was trying to get at!

Basically what I was saying is that it is completly and utterly unnecessary when this could be rped anyway. I just said it in a way that seemed to look like i was actually supporting the suggestion, but alas sarcasim doesn't portray very well in a forum.

[Phalynx]

Thats the point... in 78 years of Cantr ...there has been NO births..NO childhoods.... to change that..changes Cantr... not just the way some things function... but...It just seems so wrong to me... Cantrians have always spawned.... and why would sex have to become a manditory part of Cantr? I don't like the idea of babies in cantr...never have, don't think I ever would... they will be a novilty at first.. then ignored and left to die...... anyways... different subject.
The idea of projects for sex... is just wrong and doesn't belong..

I agree... There is no point at all.
There is some talk of people being able to play their own babies... WTF? Wouldn't that completely undermine the CRB.

[Solfius]

Thats the point... in 78 years of Cantr ...there has been NO births..NO childhoods.... to change that..changes Cantr... not just the way some things function... but...It just seems so wrong to me... Cantrians have always spawned.... and why would sex have to become a manditory part of Cantr? I don't like the idea of babies in cantr...never have, don't think I ever would... they will be a novilty at first.. then ignored and left to die...... anyways... different subject.
The idea of projects for sex... is just wrong and doesn't belong..

Surely if babies are the only way to spawn players will wise up to the fact that if they ever want characters again they need to look after the babies and convince others to do the same?

[Solfius]

Thats the point... in 78 years of Cantr ...there has been NO births..NO childhoods.... to change that..changes Cantr... not just the way some things function... but...It just seems so wrong to me... Cantrians have always spawned.... and why would sex have to become a manditory part of Cantr? I don't like the idea of babies in cantr...never have, don't think I ever would... they will be a novilty at first.. then ignored and left to die...... anyways... different subject.
The idea of projects for sex... is just wrong and doesn't belong..

I agree... There is no point at all.
There is some talk of people being able to play their own babies... WTF? Wouldn't that completely undermine the CRB.

It would necessitate a change in the CR, and wouldn't complicate the situation much. It's fairly easy to prove that two of a players characters are working together, but it's harder to show that the characters are using information they don't have. Such a change wouldn't alter that fact, it would just change what characters you could have working together.

[Sunni Daez]

and cause even more undo stress to the overwhelmed PD with all the additional CRB reports.... if a player RP's their own baby.. at what age do they stop working together... and how could you force a parent to stop interacting with their child? It would undermine the CRB, change it completely..

[Solfius]

and cause even more undo stress to the overwhelmed PD with all the additional CRB reports.... if a player RP's their own baby.. at what age do they stop working together... and how could you force a parent to stop interacting with their child? It would undermine the CRB, change it completely..

At what age did you cease contact with your family? Some don't have contact with family, but the majority do, so to set an age to part would be wrong IMO.

And yes, the CR would be changed a great deal, but the question is whether it's a positive change, and I think it is.

[Oasis]

I think rp'ing your own child, whether it's a baby, or a newspawn, is just wrong. Where would the fun be in it? It would be like rp'ing with yourself.

And yes, the PD would have to force family's apart in many instances. These pairs couldn't be allowed to cooperate. If they were, everone caught cooperating with their own charries would claim they were their kids. What an insane mess that would be.

[SekoETC]

If children ever really get implemented, there needs to be a check that neither of the parents is played by the same person as the child will be. Wasn't there also going to be a check that you shouldn't spawn in a town where you already have a character in? So that would be extended to contain births. There's enough locations in Cantr to keep your own characters apart.

[Oasis]

Wasn't there also going to be a check that you shouldn't spawn in a town where you already have a character in?

I remember this discussion, but I don't know what was decided regarding implementing this. I still think it a good idea.

[Zanthos]

don't you find it weird that a child would be 'spawned' in a town elsewhere from where the parents were residing?

unless of course cantrians gave birth by rocketing babies somehow..

[Oasis]

Why would that be the case, Zanthos? If not played by the same player, why wouldn't they spawn where the parents are? I can't see it being any other way.

[Phalynx]

This should all cleary be placed HERE

Surely!