Another Brick in the Wall

General out-of-character discussion among players of Cantr II.

Moderators: Players Department, Public Relations Department

User avatar
Wilmer Bordonado
Posts: 836
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:55 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Another Brick in the Wall

Postby Wilmer Bordonado » Fri May 19, 2006 4:46 am

Isn't a good idea for Cantr II?

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2005/12/17/2003284808

Resources Dept. should find out how that "big wall" could be build in the middle of two sites, so everyone who wants to travel to the isolated place, simply can't reach it.

If it happens in the World, why not in Cantr?

Wilmer B.
SI A LA VIDA, NO A LAS PAPELERAS!
http://www.noalapapelera.com.ar
YES TO LIFE, NO TO PULP MILLS!
http://chrislang.blogspot.com/2006_08_31_chrislang_archive.html
User avatar
fishfin
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 12:38 pm
Location: Nanning, China

Postby fishfin » Fri May 19, 2006 6:15 am

and there would be a gate in the wall and if it has a lock in it it would have to be unlocked for you to go in?
The following statement is not true.

The previous statement is not true.
User avatar
the_antisocial_hermit
Posts: 3695
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 4:04 pm
Location: Hollow.
Contact:

Postby the_antisocial_hermit » Fri May 19, 2006 6:34 am

I don't really see a point for it in Cantr? :?

The only point for one would be if it were developed in the game between two places for whatever reasons for those places. No point if it's developed out of the game by the staff and stuck in there for no reason at all. There never have been walls between countries, unless they decided to build them for their own reasons.

And is it a suggestion or just trying to spark discussion of some sort...?
Glitch! is dead! Long live Glitch!
Remember guys and gals, it's all Pretendy Fun Time Games!
User avatar
nateflory
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: upstate, NY

Postby nateflory » Fri May 19, 2006 6:39 am

A similar "situation" to the one suggested is to construct a Hall in some location, and encourage everyone "in town" to work inside teh Hall or any number of adjoining rooms.

This way, outsiders would not be able to "enter town" without going through the walls/lock on the main Hall.
The only drawback I see here is that the resources in the area would only be available to those "outside", and thus not quite what the original posting implied.
---------------------------------
"Nature may reach the same result in many ways." - Nikola Tesla
"Dare to be naïve". - "Unity is plural and, at minimum, is two." - Bucky Fuller
User avatar
Hellzon
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 11:35 pm
Location: Sweden, 12 points

Postby Hellzon » Fri May 19, 2006 7:04 am

nateflory wrote:A similar "situation" to the one suggested is to construct a Hall in some location, and encourage everyone "in town" to work inside teh Hall or any number of adjoining rooms.

This way, outsiders would not be able to "enter town" without going through the walls/lock on the main Hall.
The only drawback I see here is that the resources in the area would only be available to those "outside", and thus not quite what the original posting implied.

Would be quite similar to actual medieval castles, though, woudn't it? The farmers hardly had enough space in the castle to farm, did they?
[21:35] Sunni: no peeing on people in chat!
tiddy ogg
Posts: 1402
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Southampton, England
Contact:

Postby tiddy ogg » Fri May 19, 2006 7:31 am

Well the Chinese did it, Hadrian did it, East Germany did it, Israel's doing it... I'm sure there have even been previous suggestions here. The alternative is to build a city indoors.
User avatar
Solfius
Posts: 3144
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:31 pm

Postby Solfius » Fri May 19, 2006 9:19 am

There have been previous suggestions. I started them ;)

This one is slightly different as it splits a location in two, whereas other suggestions blocked exit routes into locations (with an outside-the-wall location at the end of a blocked road); gatehouses were also floated.
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Fri May 19, 2006 10:54 am

It's been sugested before and it would be something ProgD would have to create, not something RD has control over.

And if you knew how broken the vehichle system is, you wouldn't need to suggest a wall.
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
The Sociologist
Posts: 878
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 11:54 pm

Postby The Sociologist » Sat May 20, 2006 12:09 am

tiddy ogg wrote:Well the Chinese did it, Hadrian did it, East Germany did it, Israel's doing it... I'm sure there have even been previous suggestions here. The alternative is to build a city indoors.

The Chinese wall hardly even slowed Genghis Khan down, Hadrian's wall had little effect, the East German wall is now chunks of tourist souvenirs, Israel's wall reminds me of South Africa's apartheid wall and will have the same effect and the same long-term result. Nope, not a fan of walls. Not for Cantr either.
User avatar
Wilmer Bordonado
Posts: 836
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:55 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Postby Wilmer Bordonado » Sat May 20, 2006 1:12 am

The Sociologist wrote:Nope, not a fan of walls. Not for Cantr either.


Neither do I. I am certainly not a fan of walls, particularly when they're built up to separate rooms instead of holding roofs. :wink:
But why should "bad" possibilities be eliminated from Cantr societies simulation? If realistic simulation is wanted, then creators might give players all the options, the worst and the best, in an ethics point of view, for them to have all the elements to choose what they want to do.
If the only way to be is being "good", that "good" does not worth a thing in itself.


Agar wrote:And if you knew how broken the vehichle system is, you wouldn't need to suggest a wall.


I'm not suggesting, I'm discussing. I would be posting in another forum if I was doing that. I do not know about that broken vehicle system, but I don't find out how it can be related with a wall. I was not talking about communications, but about repression.

nateflory wrote:A similar "situation" to the one suggested is to construct a Hall in some location, and encourage everyone "in town" to work inside teh Hall or any number of adjoining rooms.


I'm exactly doing that with one of my characters. And I have seen others had done it too. But that's not the point. With a wall, you don't give the possibility to others of entering the location, so you're protecting your location and its resources.


the_antisocial_hermit wrote:there never have been walls between countries, unless they decided to build them for their own reasons.

And is it a suggestion or just trying to spark discussion of some sort...?


Yes, you're right, but we Cantrian countries do not have the possibility of building up that large walls, even if we have our own reasons.
I'm just only posting, trying to find some opinions. If you think it should be a "formal" suggestion -I don't think so, but..- just let me know and I will ask for the move.

fishfin wrote:And there would be a gate in the wall and if it has a lock in it it would have to be unlocked for you to go in?


A gate will be included, with a combination of five different locks. So five different people, wiht five different keys, can only open that gate. :wink:
SI A LA VIDA, NO A LAS PAPELERAS!

http://www.noalapapelera.com.ar

YES TO LIFE, NO TO PULP MILLS!

http://chrislang.blogspot.com/2006_08_31_chrislang_archive.html
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Sat May 20, 2006 2:04 am

The Sociologist wrote:Israel's wall reminds me of South Africa's apartheid wall and will have the same effect and the same long-term result.
Hopefully...
Whoever you vote for.

The government wins.

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest