Thinking of buying diamonds for your Valentine?
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department
- Sunni Daez
- Posts: 3645
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:33 pm
- Location: ~A blissful state of mind~
- HoH
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:53 am
You know what would make my Valentine's Day (and possibly make me stop cursing all the guys?)?
I actually just want to get asked to the dance. No way in hell am I going to a Valentine's day dance alone. Nope.
But, considering my past dating record, its a 100% chance of staying home and watching South Park instead.
I actually just want to get asked to the dance. No way in hell am I going to a Valentine's day dance alone. Nope.
But, considering my past dating record, its a 100% chance of staying home and watching South Park instead.
-
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:23 pm
hallucinatingfarmer wrote:I don't understand the appeal of 'sexy underwear' / lingerie. As far as I'm concerned, whatever it is, I just want to take it off...grrl wrote:but i did just buy myself a sexy lil number "for valentine's"
Consider it classy wrapping paper on the best present ever.

I'm not dead; I'm dormant.
- Stan
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:29 pm
- Location: KENTUCKY, USA
- Agar
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm
Re: Thinking of buying diamonds for your Valentine?
hallucinatingfarmer wrote:Did somebody die for that diamond?
Nobody I knew personally, therefore, I don't care.
hallucinatingfarmer wrote:Was slave labour used?
I wasn't made a slave for it, so again, I don't care.
hallucinatingfarmer wrote:Was child labour used?
Snot nosed little squatters have been putting hard working adults out of jobs long enough anyway. I hope some responible 18 year old opium addict was mining diamonds, rather than a 6 year old that just wanted a bowl of watered down rice.
hallucinatingfarmer wrote:Have the profits gone to war lords?
As a card carrying member of the Helzberg Diamons Milita, I hope so. Those profits are my pay.
Seriously. WTF. "That search engine is evil, don't use it." What part of you is dysfunctional enough to take everything you hear as propganda and scour the information superhighway to find the misguided voice of dissent that you tout as truth?
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/environment.htm
Look, even the enviromentalists are lying to you. Everyone is out to get you, they all want you to believe thier lie. Everything is an illusion, the truth is forever shrouded in mystery. There is NO spoon.
Take your soapbox back to your website. I've clicked on your signature several times, keep your sermons limited to that, because that works, where this "discussion" here just irritates me and makes me want to activly dismember your arguments, but since you've bought into thier propganda, you'll never listen either.
There. I feel better. Now I'm gonna wrangle up a mess of baby seals with my Caterpillar and club them with Coke bottles. Everyone's invited to my sweat shop for BBQ afterwards. Wouldn't want to waste anything.
[edit] Oh, and STFU. [/edit]
Reality was never my strong point.
- colonel
- Posts: 1354
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:16 am
- Coramon
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: The Two Rivers
- colonel
- Posts: 1354
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:16 am
- formerly known as hf
- Posts: 4120
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Thinking of buying diamonds for your Valentine?
Er? Are you trying to criticise my belief of the 'misguided voice of dissent' by linking to something that is so misguided and so steeped in unprobable conspiracy? I might not hold conventional beliefs, but they are at least somewhat mainstream, the link above sounds more rabid than anything else.Agar wrote:Seriously. WTF. "That search engine is evil, don't use it." What part of you is dysfunctional enough to take everything you hear as propganda and scour the information superhighway to find the misguided voice of dissent that you tout as truth?
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/environment.htm
Something I agree with, at least ontologically. Truth is indeed something which does not exist in a single form, everyone is lying and telling the truth, at the same time. It depends on personal definitions of truth.they all want you to believe thier lie. Everything is an illusion, the truth is forever shrouded in mystery.
Our understanding is indeed only an illusion, one created and upheld by ourselves and those of the society we are situated within. 'Dissident' views are indeed an illusion, of another form, but one which I think can help to foster an illusion that does not hide the deep inequalities of existence.
I hardly forced you to read this against your own will? I'm not even sure I care if it irritates anyone anyway, it's probably a good thing.this "discussion" here just irritates me
Is the meat on your BBQ free range?
Whoever you vote for.
The government wins.
The government wins.
- Coramon
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: The Two Rivers
- AoM
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Right where I want to be.
-
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 12:12 am
- Location: Middle England
- Contact:
AoM wrote:The decision to not buy a diamond is not going to bring about an end to brutality in the world.
-truth
The decision to not buy a gun does not bring about an end to brutality in the world, but it cant do any damage and it might help a little bit!
Every Little Helps!
R.I.P:
Blake Stone, Jizz Bucket, Patterson Queasley, Billy Sherwood, Chavlet D'Arcy, Johnson.
Blake Stone, Jizz Bucket, Patterson Queasley, Billy Sherwood, Chavlet D'Arcy, Johnson.
- Stan
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:29 pm
- Location: KENTUCKY, USA
Ok...I have to call BS on this thread.
Remember the boycotting Denmark thread when you said NOT to boycott Denmark because of the actions of a few people. But now you're saying to boycott an entire industry because of the actions of a few people. Not everyone in the diamond business are crooks or slave masters.
I believe in boycotting whoever you want for whatever reason you want...free market. But, I think you are being hypocritical here.
Remember the boycotting Denmark thread when you said NOT to boycott Denmark because of the actions of a few people. But now you're saying to boycott an entire industry because of the actions of a few people. Not everyone in the diamond business are crooks or slave masters.
I believe in boycotting whoever you want for whatever reason you want...free market. But, I think you are being hypocritical here.
Stan wrote:I've never said anything worth quoting.
- formerly known as hf
- Posts: 4120
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
- Location: UK
I never said to boycott the whole industry, that certainly wasn't what I intended. And I wouldn't agree with that.
There has been a move to introduce a 'conflict free' diamond label (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3834677.stm) and I would suggest that people buying diamonds buy diamonds with that label
There has been a move to introduce a 'conflict free' diamond label (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3834677.stm) and I would suggest that people buying diamonds buy diamonds with that label
Whoever you vote for.
The government wins.
The government wins.
-
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 12:12 am
- Location: Middle England
- Contact:
Ok...I have to call BS on this thread.
Thats fair enough but, being the empiricist rather than an aesthetic, why should anyone risk life and limb so that something subjectively beautiful can hang of a man or womans finger or ear, or even nipple....
Even more so when there is definate exploitation and the profits are used to fund an army that systematically terrorises and rapes a population... (as an example).
I think its a fair question to ask, whether is diamonds, trainers or chocolate, who is getting stiffed for you to look spohisticated/cool or save a few pennies on soemthing you dont need anyway!
R.I.P:
Blake Stone, Jizz Bucket, Patterson Queasley, Billy Sherwood, Chavlet D'Arcy, Johnson.
Blake Stone, Jizz Bucket, Patterson Queasley, Billy Sherwood, Chavlet D'Arcy, Johnson.
Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest