Stan wrote:HF, it really isn't about what you're comfortable with. Not to sound like an ass, but it really doesn't. Even if I'm wrong the truth has nothing to do with what you're comfortable with.
If you are right, you are right. If you are wrong you are wrong. It has nothing to do with your feelings.
I know that, but at the same time, at least I acknowledge that the reason I think what I think about what is 'right' is probably more to do with my own decision and outlook.
stan wrote:But, you base your belief system on something you've made up. You don't even have a doctrine to live by. It's much easier to not make mistakes if there is no "right way".
Woah, hang on a sec. My belief system? I don't have a belief system, or a faith. I don;t place my faith in science, simply because I know it can be wrong. Science is not a belief system, or at least I wouldn't see it as such.
As for doctrine? No, I am very proud I am not indoctrinated. My morals, my "right way" - they are based on the ethics I have developed as a child from teachings, and from my own decisions, and from listening to and caring about the views of others. I would much rather have my "right way", my set of moral values based upon what I see to be right, what I feel to be right, what those around me know to be good, rather than the preachings of a book which has little to no proof behind it, and the ravings of people who preach from the book.
What disgusts me most about religions, of almost all kinds, not in the least Christianity, is the utter hypocracy of the moral doctrine. As I have said before. If someone was to follow the Bible for its word, they would be killing people left right and centre. This may not be the case, as, thankfully most people have developed a set of social values beyond just what is in the Bible. Nethertheless, it can and is used to justify all sorts of horrendous acts. I am very glad, and proud, that I do not draw my morals from such a unstable, and frankly, unreliable, source.
EDIT: I am also proud that when I decide that something is wrong, and I do not do it, it is not because I am scared of some kind of godly damnation in hell, I do it of my own choice. The only pressure on me not to 'sin' is from myself, which, as I see myself as a fairly decent person, is something I can take pride in. I do not need the threat of eternal damnation to kepp me 'good', if a doctrine needs that kind of threat to make sure people are 'good' - than that seems to me that there is a lot of willpoer lacking to do 'good' things, or, that what is 'good' for that doctrine is so warped that the only way to get people to follow it is to scare them into it.
Whoever you vote for.
The government wins.