Gas tanks and consuming fuel

Threads moved from the Suggestions forum after implementation

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
Ahoyhoy
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:24 pm

Gas tanks and consuming fuel

Postby Ahoyhoy » Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:12 am

Vehicles that have an engine should be required to consistently burn fuel. Not just put fuel in them once and they're done. A gas tank will obviously hold the fuel and should be able to be easily made to avoid too much trouble for people wanting to put gas tanks on their already made vehicles at first and then slightly more difficult after 2 weeks or so. A refinery for oil could be good for making gas, but perhaps ethanol when alcohol is introduced can be used too.

This may make things harder for people in the Cantr universe, but i'm sure they'll adapt. If not, oh well it's life...and vehicles that can run forever after they're built is not how things really work.
User avatar
formerly known as hf
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: UK

Postby formerly known as hf » Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:41 am

I was about to put this under another thread - it's been suggested before but doesn't have its own thread as yet...


I like it - but pollution should be programmed in first...
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:59 pm

First off, I hate this idea and it will stifle exploration and trade on land and sea if boats need fuel too.

Secondly, if it does hit boats, some other things should be available for boats, such as sails, oars, paddles, and poles. Poles mainly for the rafts. Remember, people are power too.

Lastly, I hate this idea. Just rename your car the Flintstone-mobile and realise that sabering a guy in a car makes it move slower.

In conclusion, I hate this idea.

:P
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 3606
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:27 pm
Location: Halifax, Canada

Postby Nick » Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:10 pm

I hate the idea too. Like cars weren't rare enough already.
User avatar
Fleegle
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Postby Fleegle » Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:06 pm

Hate it.
User avatar
theguy
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:23 pm

Postby theguy » Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:43 pm

Sorry but people work hard enoght to get vehicels alredy with very few being aroud and hardley any privetly owened people dont want to go and get fuel every time there car runs out

+ it would be hard to know how much fuel the vehicel would have and fuel consumpoion would have to be really balanced and thats just something to be constenley argued over
Blog: http://undercontrol93.blogspot.com/

returner wrote: so I could probably make a Cantr III in my spare time :P

Well where is it?
User avatar
Sunni Daez
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:33 pm
Location: ~A blissful state of mind~

Postby Sunni Daez » Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:04 pm

Agar wrote:First off, I hate this idea and it will stifle exploration and trade on land and sea if boats need fuel too.

Secondly, if it does hit boats, some other things should be available for boats, such as sails, oars, paddles, and poles. Poles mainly for the rafts. Remember, people are power too.

Lastly, I hate this idea. Just rename your car the Flintstone-mobile and realise that sabering a guy in a car makes it move slower.

In conclusion, I hate this idea.

:P


I agree ... I do not like this Idea either...
Image

Run...Dragon...Run!!!
User avatar
creepyguyinblack
Posts: 680
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Postby creepyguyinblack » Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:25 pm

I disagree. Vehicles with engines should require fuel, and with this, they should also be made easier to make as Jos desired. This would help counterbalance the bicycles and other non-engine vehicles. They would become more valuable in areas with little or no available oil/gas. I think it'd be interesting if different fuels could be used though, such as ethanol from fermenting fruit, so this change could coincide with alcohol ;)
To make things even more interesting, should the programming infrastructure be properly in place, we could even have coal or steam driven vehicles.
“We are beginning to see intimations of this in the implantation of computer devices into the human body.”

Ray Kurzweil quotes
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:36 pm

creepyguyinblack wrote:They would become more valuable in areas with little or no available oil/gas.


...

"areas with little or no available oil/gas" ?

So ... like all of cantr?

That would spring into existance a desert empire of oil barons. And it still doesn't adress the issue that sabering a guy on a car makes him drive off slower.

Say it with me:

"Flintstone-mobile"
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
wichita
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Suomessa!

Postby wichita » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:08 pm

Theoretically I agree, but practically it will never work out. It would be great to see certain hills and desert regions to become the Cantrian equivalent to Saudi Arabia...but that would require trade and....well.....we all know how that goes.

It still requires a lot of cooperation to get vehicles efficiently, and once you get one, maintaining it would be the rest of your existence. Maybe once it is still a bit more efficient to produce a vehicle, then we could revisit this. Or if we get an enormously productive machine to mass produce fuel, then that would be something.
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
User avatar
Racetyme
Posts: 1151
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:21 am
Location: The Internets

Postby Racetyme » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:32 pm

This suggestion sucks more than Pamela Anderson.
User avatar
Fleegle
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Postby Fleegle » Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:58 am

Teehee.
User avatar
Ahoyhoy
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:24 pm

Postby Ahoyhoy » Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:05 am

Boats would not require gas because boats do not have engines. Like I said, only vehicles with boats. Maybe Cantrarians are too young for such a development to occur.
User avatar
wichita
Administrator Emeritus
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Suomessa!

Postby wichita » Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:09 am

Until we get motor boats, then we would be back to considering it again.

Wouldn't it be cool to send big steam ships and eventually full blown freighters off to help speed up intercontinental trade? Of course, we'd want to have lockable cabins and storage aboard then. :wink:
"Y-O-U! It's just two extra letters! Come on, people! This is the internet, not a barn!" --Kid President
User avatar
Peanut
Posts: 1155
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:01 pm

Postby Peanut » Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:45 am

Use food as fuel.

Return to “Implemented Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest