Change in the Item Deterioration Terminology

[swymir]

I found it odd to day that I saw an "Often-used" landmark. After a quick smirk I began to think the term "used" is mis-leading since an item can get that way without ever being used at all. Maybe change it to something like "worn" just to make me happy.

[west]

I've long been in favor of a more accurate descriptor of decay that "used". "brand new" and "new" are also misleading--how can something old be made new again? I'd prefer "well-maintained" or "pristine".

[Surly]

*mutters something about balance, and pointlessness*

[Schme]

Good idea.

I don't want to think about what people would be using a landmark for.

[A Neo Irony]

We must all have heat vision and keep wearing down the landmarks every time we read them.

[Schme]

Oh, that's right.

I must have forgotten.

[Agar]

NO No NO!

Keep the terminology the same as it is right now, at least long enough for me to see an "often used body of a woman in her twenties"

Then you can change it.

Yes, My only motive is a cheap, juvinile laugh.

[kinvoya]

Agar, Jos removed that term from the bodies a long time ago. Never gonna happen, dude.

[Savanik]

... at least long enough for me to see an "often used body of a woman in her twenties"

You've got a wife, don't you?

Love,
Yer Bro

[swymir]

I don't think it shoudl take very long to change and it would certainly make my OCD go into remision.