Zeppelins
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department, Game Mechanics (RD)
- Chris Johnson
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 3:26 pm
- Location: East Sussex, United Kingdom
- Contact:
This has been suggested before, several times in the past (search for balloons - ..yes I know we are talking about powered flight here)
It would not take a great deal of additional programming , most of the boat movement code could be used but with no stopping at water/land boundaries.
They probably would require landing masts to dock and fixed installations where they can be built.
Until free-roaming for land vehicles and people is implemented, fo rthe sake of game balance, I can't see these being able to land anywhere they want or be able to transfer things between ground & sky other than at landing masts.
It would not take a great deal of additional programming , most of the boat movement code could be used but with no stopping at water/land boundaries.
They probably would require landing masts to dock and fixed installations where they can be built.
Until free-roaming for land vehicles and people is implemented, fo rthe sake of game balance, I can't see these being able to land anywhere they want or be able to transfer things between ground & sky other than at landing masts.
- WojD
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: PL
- Contact:
- formerly known as hf
- Posts: 4120
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:58 pm
- Location: UK
It shouldn't be able to land on mountains, swamp, forest or hills - only plains and deserts unless there's a landing point - that'd allow smaller version to explore, but within limits...
Flight would be a great addition - as Wich said, we need faster land transport - in some cases (K-Isle) It's quicker to sail around an island than to travel across it...
Flight would be a great addition - as Wich said, we need faster land transport - in some cases (K-Isle) It's quicker to sail around an island than to travel across it...
Whoever you vote for.
The government wins.
The government wins.
- WojD
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: PL
- Contact:
hallucinatingfarmer wrote:It shouldn't be able to land on mountains, swamp, forest or hills - only plains and deserts unless there's a landing point - that'd allow smaller version to explore, but within limits...
Good limitation - maybe except hills - and we should let landing at beach...
==============
- Chris Johnson
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 3:26 pm
- Location: East Sussex, United Kingdom
- Contact:
Personally I like the idea of dirigible aircraft such as zeppelins but the implementation has to be thought out very carefully .
What is being proposed in the last two posts is a vehicle which can land in numerous locations and travel freely across all terrain types . This will seriously unbalance the game, other vehicles (boats and many land vehicles) will become obsolete .
I wouldn't like to see their introduction unless there were serious limitations , similar to what I proposed .
What is being proposed in the last two posts is a vehicle which can land in numerous locations and travel freely across all terrain types . This will seriously unbalance the game, other vehicles (boats and many land vehicles) will become obsolete .
I wouldn't like to see their introduction unless there were serious limitations , similar to what I proposed .
- T-shirt
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: NL
- wichita
- Administrator Emeritus
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
- Location: Suomessa!
- WojD
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: PL
- Contact:
Dirigibles are:
- expensive
- slow
- can't carry much
- are limited to some terrain types (landing)
If 'Zeppelin' will be expensive (eg. 2000 - 5000g silk cloth, 500 - 1000g aluminium, 1000 g medium rope, 100 g magnesium, 500g steel, 2000 g propan), with speed ~2000 units (less over land perhaps), can carry 2-3 people - and can't land in many locations - this cannot unbalance game.
Boats with high carryon - always will be better for trade or communication between islands. Dirigibles will help to communicate over land. Land vehicles - less expensive and more flexible (can go to every location type) - still will be better...
- expensive
- slow
- can't carry much
- are limited to some terrain types (landing)
If 'Zeppelin' will be expensive (eg. 2000 - 5000g silk cloth, 500 - 1000g aluminium, 1000 g medium rope, 100 g magnesium, 500g steel, 2000 g propan), with speed ~2000 units (less over land perhaps), can carry 2-3 people - and can't land in many locations - this cannot unbalance game.
Boats with high carryon - always will be better for trade or communication between islands. Dirigibles will help to communicate over land. Land vehicles - less expensive and more flexible (can go to every location type) - still will be better...
==============
- Savanik
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:53 am
- Location: Missouri, USA
- WojD
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: PL
- Contact:
Rope machine
* 1000 grams of wood
* 750 grams of iron
Manufacturing thin rope
* 800 grams of thin rope
Required resources
* 800 grams of string
Manufacturing medium rope
* 400 grams of medium rope
Required resources
* 800 grams of thin rope
---------------------------------
Rope is rare because there is no usage for this resource except stone quarry (lack of timber) and Set of hoists and pulleys (??!! for what it is?)
* 1000 grams of wood
* 750 grams of iron
Manufacturing thin rope
* 800 grams of thin rope
Required resources
* 800 grams of string
Manufacturing medium rope
* 400 grams of medium rope
Required resources
* 800 grams of thin rope
---------------------------------
Rope is rare because there is no usage for this resource except stone quarry (lack of timber) and Set of hoists and pulleys (??!! for what it is?)
==============
- Savanik
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:53 am
- Location: Missouri, USA
Rope is rare because there is no usage for this resource except stone quarry (lack of timber) and Set of hoists and pulleys (??!! for what it is?)
I was going to say - it's not rare because we CAN'T make it, it's rare because we DON'T...

I'd put it at around the same rarity as things like copper wire. Nobody makes it except for a single special purpose. It's not something you can just walk into a town and trade for.
Sav
Humility is one of my greatest virtues.
- WojD
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: PL
- Contact:
- Pie
- Posts: 3256
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:30 am
- Location: the headquarters of P.I.E.
ok, i have to agree, but, THAT WILL MAKE DARIGABLES UNCOMON. And it wont do anything. We have to have a RESON FOR DARIGABLES.
In world war II, and I i think, darigables where used in reconasance, and IT SHOULD BE THE SAME HERE. Just think, its expenciv, but it will help with wars. A RESON FOR TEH DARIGABLES!! WWOOOOooP!!!!
In world war II, and I i think, darigables where used in reconasance, and IT SHOULD BE THE SAME HERE. Just think, its expenciv, but it will help with wars. A RESON FOR TEH DARIGABLES!! WWOOOOooP!!!!
Pnumerical Intuitiong Engyn
Paranormal Investigation Exorsism
Porcupine Interspecies Extra_poison
Pick In Enter
... The headquarters of P.I.E.!!!
Paranormal Investigation Exorsism
Porcupine Interspecies Extra_poison
Pick In Enter
... The headquarters of P.I.E.!!!
- El_Skwidd
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:07 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
I like the idea of a small and a large zeppelin, one with a decent amount of docking flexibility like hal. farmer mentioned and one that can only dock at landing masts like Chris said.
I'd imagine that the landing mast would be expensive. I don't know a lot about it, but I know that the big pole on top of the Empire State Building was designed for dirigibles to dock to, and it's on top of a skyscraper. It would have to be tall enough to reach above the trees of a forest.
Now, when you say 2-3 people, do you mean 2-3 people plus cargo space or 2-3 people total cargo capacity? The Hindenburg carried a lot more than 3 people... or, at least it did in that movie.
I'd imagine that the landing mast would be expensive. I don't know a lot about it, but I know that the big pole on top of the Empire State Building was designed for dirigibles to dock to, and it's on top of a skyscraper. It would have to be tall enough to reach above the trees of a forest.
Now, when you say 2-3 people, do you mean 2-3 people plus cargo space or 2-3 people total cargo capacity? The Hindenburg carried a lot more than 3 people... or, at least it did in that movie.
Cdls wrote:Explaining Cantr to a newb would be like explaining sex to a virgin.
Let the world hear these words once more:
Save us, oh Lord, from the wrath of the Norsemen!
- WojD
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: PL
- Contact:
Yes - but this is Cantr
If we make big dirgibles able to carry 10 persons, then 1 person can take huge cargo. If possible is to program diferent flight speed over land and sea - and make our Hindenburg slower than sloob and slower than car - all will be OK.
Small version should be a bit faster than bike or dinghy and carry max 3 people with not very high load.
EDIT:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster

Small version should be a bit faster than bike or dinghy and carry max 3 people with not very high load.
EDIT:
The LZ 129 Hindenburg and her sister-ship LZ 130 Graf Zeppelin II were the two largest aircraft ever built. The Hindenburg was named after the President of Germany, Paul von Hindenburg. It was a brand-new, all-duralumin design: 245 m long (804 ft), 41 m in diameter (135 ft), containing 200,000 m³ (7,060,000 ft³) of gas in 16 bags or cells, with a useful lift of 112.1 metric tons force (1.099 MN), powered by four reversible 1,200 horsepower (890 kW) Daimler-Benz diesel engines, giving it a maximum speed of 135 km/h (84 mph).
To most of the modern world, which only knows about airships from seeing blimps, it is worth pointing out that the average blimp is roughly 1/10 the length of the Hindenburg. The Hindenburg was longer than three Boeing 747s placed end-to-end.
It could carry 72 passengers (50 transatlantic) and had a crew of 61.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster
==============
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest