So...the election is coming up

General chitchat, advertisements for other services, and other non-Cantr-related topics

Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department

User avatar
Pirog
Posts: 2046
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 8:36 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

So...the election is coming up

Postby Pirog » Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:10 pm

How do you all think it ends?

I'm afraid that Bush will win again. I hope...had I been religious had I prayed, that the Americans are smart enough to give him another 4 years to ruin the world.

It looks to be very close whoever will win.
I'm not sure that Kerry is a much better leader, but he can't be worse.
Eat the invisible food, Industrialist...it's delicious!
User avatar
nitefyre
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:29 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Postby nitefyre » Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:07 pm

The election, wha?

>.>

Okay, fine, Nader all the way, bitches!



At this point, I don't see much difference between them, apart from their personalities and appearances. :) You've got a few policy issues that differ ~ bah.

As much as I have been thinking Bush would clinch this election, I wouldn't mind seeing the supposed 'change' that Kerry would bring (as I doubt it would be much).
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:17 pm

I'd rather vote for Swartzenegger.
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
ephiroll
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
Location: here and there
Contact:

Postby ephiroll » Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:18 pm

I say we drop Bush and Kerry both out to sea and make Nadar our president, but since that won't happen, I'm pretty sure Bush is going to win. Of course that will be after about 50 recounts...
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
The Industriallist
Posts: 1862
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:25 pm

Postby The Industriallist » Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:25 pm

ephiroll wrote:I say we drop Bush and Kerry both out to sea and make Nadar our president, but since that won't happen, I'm pretty sure Bush is going to win. Of course that will be after about 50 recounts...

I don't think the chances of a repeat recount incident are very high. Even government organizations aren't dumb enough to publically humiliate themselves twice in a row.

And I wouldn't dump them out to sea...if you're going that way, flee yourself. Preferably to outside Earths atmosphere. Probably neither of them will get there too quick.

But why do you think Bush will win? My sources lean towards Kerry.
"If I can be a good crackhead, I can be a good Christian"

-A subway preacher
avi messika
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:46 pm

Postby avi messika » Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:35 pm

my sources lean to kerry only because of voter polls. they only take into account people who voted in the last 2 elections. what about all the young people who don't usually vote, they will vote this time...
User avatar
Cheshierekat
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 4:40 am
Location: Somewhere in the Amazon

Postby Cheshierekat » Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:50 pm

I already voted. :D Voting by mail is awesome.
When people tell me that great minds think alike, all I can do is look at them and think "oh you dirty, dirty bastard"
User avatar
Oasis
Posts: 4566
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:30 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Postby Oasis » Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:30 am

As a cynical Canadian, I predict Bush by one electoral vote (or one state, however that works), mostly due to Nader's pulling Kerry votes away from him, not Bush. If Canadians were allowed to vote, Kerry would win by a landslide, but we're not the 51'st state yet lol.
The Industriallist
Posts: 1862
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:25 pm

Postby The Industriallist » Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:56 am

Oasis wrote:As a cynical Canadian, I predict Bush by one electoral vote (or one state, however that works), mostly due to Nader's pulling Kerry votes away from him, not Bush.

Could happen :?
But I think this election is so radicalized that (almost) anyone in a swingable state is going to vote for whichever they consider the lesser of two evils. Throwing a swing-vote to a non-majority candidate really is disenfranchising yourself...As a voter for a solidly non-swingable state, I'm already disenfranchised as far as that goes :lol: Still voted, though.

Techincal point: Winning by a state is pretty much guaranteed, I would say, since NY and Texas would almost certainly be enough to toss the election either way. The thing is that they don't swing. Ever.

As for winning by one electoral vote...in theory it can happen. In practice, considering that at least most states cast all votes for the same candidate, I don't know that there's any way the states can fall that would give such a small gap. There might be, though.
"If I can be a good crackhead, I can be a good Christian"



-A subway preacher
User avatar
Agar
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:43 pm

Postby Agar » Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 am

Oasis wrote:As a cynical Canadian, I predict Bush by one electoral vote (or one state, however that works), mostly due to Nader's pulling Kerry votes away from him, not Bush. If Canadians were allowed to vote, Kerry would win by a landslide, but we're not the 51'st state yet lol.


Nader pulling votes away? I didn't even know he was running till I read "Over the Hedge". Nader will have no influence. Jed Bush will be up to his old tricks again, though.
Reality was never my strong point.
User avatar
Surly
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: London, England

Postby Surly » Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:30 am

I think I speak for most Europeans in backing Kerry... The lesser of two evils, probably. :evil:

However, I think Bush will be re-elected. You Americans are going to be absolutely loathed around the world by the end of his second term... :roll:
Formerly known as "The Surly Cantrian"
Former CD chair, former MD chair, former RD member, former Personnel Officer, former GAB member.
User avatar
ephiroll
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
Location: here and there
Contact:

Postby ephiroll » Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:44 am

The Industriallist wrote:
ephiroll wrote:I say we drop Bush and Kerry both out to sea and make Nadar our president, but since that won't happen, I'm pretty sure Bush is going to win. Of course that will be after about 50 recounts...

I don't think the chances of a repeat recount incident are very high. Even government organizations aren't dumb enough to publically humiliate themselves twice in a row.

And I wouldn't dump them out to sea...if you're going that way, flee yourself. Preferably to outside Earths atmosphere. Probably neither of them will get there too quick.

But why do you think Bush will win? My sources lean towards Kerry.


It's already turning into a joke in florida, this state has already lost some early votes and absentee ballads, we're almost quaranteed a recount already.

I still say out to sea, let the fishes have them, if they will...

Nadar is expected to pull about 2-3% of the vote in florida, everyone I know is voting for him, and the votes nadar is pulling is away from kerry. This state is key in the election, whoever wins here will almost definatly win.
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
User avatar
ephiroll
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
Location: here and there
Contact:

Postby ephiroll » Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:47 am

The Surly Cantrian wrote:

You Americans are going to be absolutely loathed around the world by the end of his second term... :roll:


You say that like we'd care...and as if it would be something new :roll:
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson
User avatar
Surly
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: London, England

Postby Surly » Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:57 am

Indeed. Bush evidently doesn't care, but then I don't think Bush is particularly concerned with foreign nations. With the possible exception of Britain, Russia and China. And the obvious exception of Tie-Rack. Sorry, Iraq...

:P
Formerly known as "The Surly Cantrian"
Former CD chair, former MD chair, former RD member, former Personnel Officer, former GAB member.
User avatar
ephiroll
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:00 am
Location: here and there
Contact:

Postby ephiroll » Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:20 am

Yeah, Bush is a jackass, he "doesn't care" in the wrong way. The billions spent in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the other few dozen countries we're sending aid to woudl be better spent here at home. If it was up to me we'd return to an isolationist policy and not change that till we'd pumped enough money into our education system and economy to be on top again and be damned what anyone thought of it.
http://www.ephiroll.com
Jeremiah 'Jerry' Donaldson

Return to “Non-Cantr-Related Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest