KeVes wrote:It is much easier to belive in Aliens and UFO for me, then in any "god", even I can believe in Däniken, that religions was created because of Aliens, which were called gods in past, and they even could made process evolution of humans going faster by genetic enegineering, but not "god" bullshit. You can go to your "paradise" with your theories about god, but do not convice those who do not believe in that bullshit, because you do not have any arguments, and science is against you.
And simple, any religion is just a much bigger SECT which is trying to wash a brain of good freethinkers without any effect. That's all. I can make the same religion bullshit for brainwash someone, but why I have to manipulate someone like that???
You're one of those conspiracy people, aren't you? There's more evidence for God than aliens. Aliens, based off evidence alone and not personal experience, have about the same likelihood as God, just slightly lower. For both there's witnesses and non-conclusive physical evidence. The only difference is that a lot more people claim to have witnessed God than to have witnessed aliens. And I'm one of the people who can feel some part of God's power, or of the Holy Ghost's power, or of whatever power I'm feeling. And there's laboratory evidence that aliens may be hallucinations caused by strange conditions rarely encountered in nature. Am I the only one who finds it strange that the only people who 'remember' alien encounters that haven't been proven wrong or nearly proven wrong got the memories from counseling and, sometimes, hypnotism?
Now, as for your blatant insults against religion, 1.If you think I haven't had moments of doubt than you're quite misinformed, but my faith has been confirmed when it counted including, by the way, in moments when the evidence for aliens seemed tremendous. Fear of aliens has also attacked me at some of these times. A quick prayer later and it all evaporated.
2.Do you want to know what the evidence is that all religions are working towards the same goal of depriving people of the will to think? Zippo. What're you, drunk? By following the teachings of my religion, people are happier. Period. Not just because of God's support, either. Even if my religion were a lie, I'd still follow its teachings, because they lead to happiness. Pure and simple.
3.The 'international' edition of the Bible has probably been edited so that it doesn't offend people as much as the original would. Naturally the truth is going to hurt people who base their lifestyles off of the Devil's lies, but I doubt the producers of this were thinking about that. I have no personal experience with this version of the Bible, so I have no authority whatsoever other than that I can, on occasion, make a good educated guess.
All right Antichrist, let's get to work on you. Mormonism in its purity has never hurt anyone. Ever. Mormons have hurt people, but not the church as a whole. A prophet has never made a decision that has hurt the church or the world. Gee, almost sounds like they're taking orders from a guy who knows exactly what's going to happen next, huh? There is no control involved in the church. There is order. There must be order for there to be prosperity, but there is no 'believe or ELSE!' sentiment. When we preach, we focus on the positive. After all, we're one of the few Christian churches that believes that non-believers won't go to Hell, a fact that Pie himself uncovered in the Bible (three degree's of reward, you say? You mean like Mormons believe in three degree's of reward?)
antichrist_online wrote:I never say they cause anything, rather they are caused by things.
So basically...they don't matter? At all?
HF, I did say things I shouldn't have, which is one of the reasons I posted that. If I personally say it then, for some reason, it makes it more likely for me to remember it and practice it. Also, West didn't say that, the writer of 'The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy' did, and he was making a joke. The whole book was a joke, none of it making any sense.
I specifically put on 'disagree with all' which, by the way, means you disagree with all of them. Maybe the poll glitched and this didn't get in. I'm aware that atheists and agnostics (who believe that God is derived purely from the self and is therefore incapable of actually affecting the world and therefore...doesn't exist, logically...making them atheists...) exist and
attempted to give them a place in this poll. It's not my fault if the forum messed it up.
Who knows what freakish perversion of reality those people were worshipping? And besides, King Kill, if you step out of your 'once you're dead it's over' perspective and into the people in that churches 'once you're dead you get judged and go to Heaven or Hell' perspective, than the best place to die is at worship, the moment after you've repented and been forgiven of your sins. My perspective is actually 'once you're dead you get judged and go to one of four places based on how good you've been', for the record.
Joshua, he's talking about the whole debate. I'm getting kind of sick of it too, but on the upside I'm not losing anymore.
I can't remember, has anyone provided scientific evidence as to why God can't have started the Big Bang? Not to mention seeing as the Big Bang is just a theory, isn't putting weight in it a bit unintelligent? With God I recieved confirmation and in times of doubt I continue to recieve it. What does the Big Bang give you?