Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:30 pm
Your position in the birth queue is: 94
anyone around that point? Am I going to have any cantry siblings?
Cantr II Discussion Forum
A forum for discussion about the PBBRPG Cantr II
https://forum.cantr.org:443/
Faery Tale Online (FTO)
Page 4 of 49
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:44 pm
I'm 35th
anyone around that point? Am I going to have any cantry siblings?
anyone around that point? Am I going to have any cantry siblings?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:46 pm
I am trying to convince my mom to make new babies:)
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:04 pm
Please do have as many babies as possible, position in the birth queue 263
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:44 pm
Wow, I am 6th in the queue and only 1 pregger. Any cantrian folks gonna be popping some out soon?? *keeps fingers crossed*
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:48 pm
I'm 13 in queue, and I hope and pray I'm born to cantrians.
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:10 pm
Pregnant Mothers: 0
Your position in the birth queue is: 74
Your position in the birth queue is: 74
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:16 pm
Pregnant Mothers: 0
Your position in the birth queue is: 24
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:19 pm
Got banned for reporting a bug. lol.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:30 pm
Whaaa, seriously?
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:31 pm
Nice 
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:39 pm
Oh, I read the topic on it and looks like it's just a slap on the fingers. Just because you assume a lot of people were exploiting a bug doesn't give you a right to make it public so that more people would get tempted to exploit it. It's just going to lead into more need for cleaning up afterwards.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:51 pm
If I've said it once, I've said it a million times. If you exploit something after it's been publicly exposed, you must be really fucking stupid.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:09 pm
Stupid or not, deleting the items duplicated on purpose would take a while whether or not their owners got permabanned. In KoL they accidentally put Valentines for sale for free one year, leading into everybody hoarding loads of them. In the end they had to delete all of them because there was no way of telling which ones had been purchased legitimately. Or in Cantr there used to be a bug that allowed making sextants or something without all the components, but they couldn't delete all the items because some of them had already been sold to a person who didn't know it had been created due to a bug. Sometimes exploits end up hurting people who didn't exploit them, and it causes extra trouble for staff the more people end up exploiting something, so "everybody else is also exploiting it" shouldn't be used as an excuse.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:50 am
It wasn't.
EDIT: Honestly, unless there are clear guidelines about it, people can't say shit. Besides the bogus "security" crap lumin mentioned (imho duplication isn't a security issue and HAS been publicly referenced there before) which isn't actually a refernce to what she posted, there's nothing.
In fact, it's clearly written exploitable bugs should be reported on the forum, since FTO -is- in BETA. I have so much more to say on this, but I don't feel like arguing with people who can't be bothered to get the background facts about both sides of the ban (including legitimacy, fact backing and previous similar situations) before hand.
EDITx2: Regardless of what -you- think she did or did not have the right to do, it's the ToS that dictates actions and acceptable behavior in this situation, not you or I.
EDIT: Honestly, unless there are clear guidelines about it, people can't say shit. Besides the bogus "security" crap lumin mentioned (imho duplication isn't a security issue and HAS been publicly referenced there before) which isn't actually a refernce to what she posted, there's nothing.
In fact, it's clearly written exploitable bugs should be reported on the forum, since FTO -is- in BETA. I have so much more to say on this, but I don't feel like arguing with people who can't be bothered to get the background facts about both sides of the ban (including legitimacy, fact backing and previous similar situations) before hand.
EDITx2: Regardless of what -you- think she did or did not have the right to do, it's the ToS that dictates actions and acceptable behavior in this situation, not you or I.