I'd like to know what the ruling is on using a symbol that isnt particularly owned by one person and is fairly common.
Say a person wanted to use the Rose of England Rugby?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_na ... union_team
Of course it wouldn't say England Rugby, but could such a common symbol as that be used in Cantr?[/img]
Plagarism
Moderators: Public Relations Department, Players Department, Programming Department
- TatteredShoeLace
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 1:50 am
Plagarism
1223-4: You kill a elephant using a longbow.
Nick wrote:If you don't check your characters once a day, you're not going anywhere in Cantr.
- Oasis
- Posts: 4565
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:30 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
To me, without the words, it is just a nice picture of a rose. I'm not sure if others would identify this particular rose as being from the rugby team, but I don't see any problem with it.
The general rule is things like rl flags, and symbols that are recognizable as representing something in the real world (Macdonalds M sign for example) should not be used.
Nothing should be used with the actual words, but some images become rather generic once those are removed.
The general rule is things like rl flags, and symbols that are recognizable as representing something in the real world (Macdonalds M sign for example) should not be used.
Nothing should be used with the actual words, but some images become rather generic once those are removed.
Return to “Capital Rule Breaches”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest