Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:24 am
by Peanut
Hence why i thought this was a bug

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:40 am
by tiddy ogg
In my innocence, I thought the char just meant to keep popping back to the destruction project around update time... But what about copying keys: this can be continued after giving the original key away. (You can rationalise this by claiming you only need the original to mark out a pattern for the copy, perhaps.)
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:16 pm
by Just A Bill
I don't see copying keys as a big deal, like you said the copy project could lay out the pattern.
Perhaps clay could be added to the copy project to make the impression...
*ducks to avoid rotten tomatoes and whatever else is thrown*
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:14 pm
by Peter
I didn't hear the outcome, has it been taken care of?
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:24 pm
by Chris Johnson
As a rule the Players Department don't recontact the reporter of a CRB , after the initial acknowledgement , unless they require further infomation.
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 1:08 pm
by swymir
I must say that instead of changing the way lockpicking works change how long it takes for boats to undock. It's the fact that they can undock instantly that makes pirating so easy.
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:18 am
by Surly
swymir wrote:I must say that instead of changing the way lockpicking works change how long it takes for boats to undock. It's the fact that they can undock instantly that makes pirating so easy.
Seconded.
Been calling for something like that for years...

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:54 pm
by Peter
If we (or just me) do not get to hear the outcome, how will I ever know this char being trustworthy to play with? I wouldn't play a game with someone cheating with monopoly.
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:20 pm
by Sho
With regard to clear-cut rules breaches, PD reliably finishes what it starts. Assume it has been taken care of.
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:24 pm
by cantrlady
Peter,
You can trust that we have looked into everything and no, we do not let you know that outcome as if we were dealing with you on an issue - it would remain private.
Sarah
Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:03 am
by Peter
The person found a workaround.
