See below: (sorry i didn't flip it, it's still bottom-up)
588-3: You say: "ooc: No, you`re wrong. You can`t tell people information ooc in game that might affect their decisions in game because once that information`s out there it`s very hard for them not to use it IC. Even if you know there`s no wood in Kwor Forest, there`s no cause to be telling people that OOC ingame. Just because you put OOC at the beginning doesn`t mean it`s not breaking the CR. "
588-3: H***** says: "OOC: when i say it in this mode it is not breaking the capital rule. but when you talk about something thats was spokin in OOC in IC you broke the rule. I didn`t "
588-3: You say: "ooc: about my `no wood in the forest` remark. Unless someone went to the forest and told H****; she shouldn`t know that there`s no wood there. But if someone did tell her, it`s perfectly fine for her to tell us IC so i responded IC. H***, how did you know there is no wood in the forest? If this is something your character didn`t find out herself or had told to her by someone here, you just broke the Capital Rule by telling us there`s no wood there.

588-1: R****** says: "[my char] what are you talking about. why did you just say that. OOC: when you respon about a thing said in OOC: you have to have it in OOC:"
588-1: You say: "There is no wood in the forest? That`s like saying there`s no air in the sky, no rocks in the mountains. You`re kidding, right?"
588-1: ******* says: "OOC: there is no wood in the forest just healing food."