Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:42 am
To be honest, this has reached the point that a month's mockery is a small price to pay... 
Cantr II Discussion Forum
A forum for discussion about the PBBRPG Cantr II
https://forum.cantr.org:443/
Back button on machine project pages
Page 4 of 5
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:34 am
Care to up the ante, then? Do I hear three months?
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:32 pm
They don't seem to be biting...
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:36 pm
They probably never will even though it's one of the most friggin simple things that they could do and wouldn't take much time.
You just can't expect simple things from people, got to remember that, Surly.
You just can't expect simple things from people, got to remember that, Surly.
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:21 am
Just going to be obnoxious and keep posting this until I get satisfaction.
Have at thee, Programming Department!
Have at thee, Programming Department!
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:58 am
Uh oh, I think he's serious... quick, fix it! Save us all! 
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:36 pm
And bumped.
Do I get in trouble for accepting my own suggestions?
Do I get in trouble for accepting my own suggestions?
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:34 pm
Bump again.
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:33 pm
*repeat bump*
EDIT: Changed the thread name as the original subject was achieved, but most of this whole thread is dedicated to people (mainly me, I suppose ) wanting a back button on machine projects.
EDIT: Changed the thread name as the original subject was achieved, but most of this whole thread is dedicated to people (mainly me, I suppose
) wanting a back button on machine projects.Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:27 am
Please stop bumping this suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:58 am
Then accept or reject it.
Currently this suggestion is 769 days old... I know if I stop bumping it, this will just be conveniently forgotten like it has been before.
Currently this suggestion is 769 days old... I know if I stop bumping it, this will just be conveniently forgotten like it has been before.
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:50 am
The Surly Cantrian wrote:Then accept or reject it.
Currently this suggestion is 769 days old... I know if I stop bumping it, this will just be conveniently forgotten like it has been before.
Then let it be forgotten.
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:59 am
DELGRAD wrote:The Surly Cantrian wrote:Then accept or reject it.
Currently this suggestion is 769 days old... I know if I stop bumping it, this will just be conveniently forgotten like it has been before.
Then let it be forgotten.
Why should he let it be? He deems it important so either reject or accept.
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:36 am
*watches the thread slide down the page*
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:53 am
The Surly Cantrian wrote:Then accept or reject it.
Currently this suggestion is 769 days old... I know if I stop bumping it, this will just be conveniently forgotten like it has been before.
As I doubt it is actually difficult, and the only reason it has not been worked on is because the incredibly understaffed ProgD has some real and important issues to work on at the moment, I'll accept it, if you could...
Chris Johnson wrote:Please stop bumping this suggestion