Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 7:20 pm
It wasn't sarcasm. 
Eventually they'll implement it just to shut me up. I hope...
Cantr II Discussion Forum
A forum for discussion about the PBBRPG Cantr II
https://forum.cantr.org:443/
Back button on machine project pages
Page 3 of 5
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:41 pm
Bump.
Eventually they'll implement it just to shut me up. I hope...
Eventually they'll implement it just to shut me up. I hope...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 8:19 am
No need for bumping this thread.
It's already flysprayed isn't it?
It's already flysprayed isn't it?
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 12:20 pm
Can't you smell the desperation from the man? Let him have his fun...
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:58 pm
It's no fun, man, believe me.
IT'S SO DAMN SIMPLE!! WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THESE SMALL BASIC CHANGES BEFORE ANY MORE MAJOR CHANGES? HMM? PLEASE!
IT'S SO DAMN SIMPLE!! WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THESE SMALL BASIC CHANGES BEFORE ANY MORE MAJOR CHANGES? HMM? PLEASE!
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 8:56 pm
The Surly Cantrian wrote:It's no fun, man, believe me.
IT'S SO DAMN SIMPLE!! WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THESE SMALL BASIC CHANGES BEFORE ANY MORE MAJOR CHANGES? HMM? PLEASE!
Jos is working on it.
Give him some slack he can't do everything.
Go apply to progd if you think you can do it better.
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:01 pm
Oh, fair enough.
It's just that it's been months and I never heard anything. The flyspray topic I posted is still unconfirmed, unassigned and has no comments. I am the only one watching it... Is it so strange that I thought it was being overlooked?
Apologies to Jos... and any other programmers. I stand by my point about smaller, more simple implementations before more complicated issues.
(Staff applications from me probably wouldn't be received too kindly right now, Peanut. Much as I'd love to apply...)
It's just that it's been months and I never heard anything. The flyspray topic I posted is still unconfirmed, unassigned and has no comments. I am the only one watching it... Is it so strange that I thought it was being overlooked?
Apologies to Jos... and any other programmers. I stand by my point about smaller, more simple implementations before more complicated issues.
(Staff applications from me probably wouldn't be received too kindly right now, Peanut. Much as I'd love to apply...)
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:03 pm
See it this way.
If they make me staff...
If they make me staff...
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:03 am
Wow... I just noticed this was over 2 years ago, and it was never even officially accepted...The Surly Cantrian wrote:On the subject of back buttons... can we have one on the machine subjects? So we can decide against a subject and choose another without the annoiying "0 of 0g needed" projects. They really are very irritating considering a back button is all that is needed...
Please, ProgD? I promise not to be negative for a month... just please, please just give me this... finally...
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:11 am
The Surly Cantrian wrote:Please, ProgD? I promise not to be negative for a month... just please, please just give me this... finally...
Please, ProgD, please?
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:14 am
Like you have room to talk, Nick
By the way, did I ever mock the fact you have 500 more posts than me despite having been banned for two years?
By the way, did I ever mock the fact you have 500 more posts than me despite having been banned for two years?
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:32 am
It was only a year, and.........ProgD, please implement this so we can have an unsurly Surly for a month!
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:35 am
Shush you.
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:37 am
If that ever happens I think we should have a surly Surly countdown thread.
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:39 am
Oh, I can just hear the goading that month will be full of!
Hey, we could pick a date he'd crack on!
Ooops, sorry, shouldn't be chatting in there, but this is just too darned irrisistable.
Hey, we could pick a date he'd crack on!
Ooops, sorry, shouldn't be chatting in there, but this is just too darned irrisistable.