Page 2 of 2
Re: Small stone room
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:07 pm
by *ono
Yes, it no longer shows the -#subtable.name#- part in the build menu.
Re: Small stone room
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:40 pm
by Sunni Daez
YAY!!! all better
Re: Small stone room
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:14 pm
by Comy
Yay, thank you! <3
Re: Small stone room
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:09 pm
by EchoMan
Someone probably have to look over the translation database.
Re: Small stone room
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:49 pm
by Piscator
One tag has been translated in the language database for about three years. Apparently implementing a stone alcove was planned at some point and never realized. The other tag I had to add manually and needs to be translated.
Re: Small stone room
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:32 pm
by Chris
I like the idea, but the implementation leaves something to be desired. Compared to a stone extension, a stone alcove gives a lot less room. Yet the building costs in material and time are not reduced nearly as much. A stone alcove can hold 4 people, 15.4% of the 26 people held by a stone extension. It can hold 600,000 grams, 15.8% of the 3.8 million grams held by a stone extension. However, it requires 5,000 stone (50%) and 8 days (66.7%) to build. I can appreciate some disadvantages to building on a smaller sale, but it's difficult to justify building an alcove after looking at the current costs and benefits, relative to an extension.