Page 1 of 1
Stone building instead of "Building or room"
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 1:36 pm
by Cantryjczyk
Simple. "or room" is completely unnecessary and silly. Archaic leftovers from the old days. And we have more buildings now (brick building, not brick building or room). So I propose just change names similarly so we can have:
- brick building, it is OK how it is now
- stone building, not building or room
- marble building, not marble building or marble room
And nothing will really change, but we can have nicer looking towns and houses. Aesthetic change really. But no more: "I live in a building or room, but not sure in with one, and what was used to create this something"
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 4:55 pm
by psymann
Seconded
psymann
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 7:03 pm
by Racetyme
Its left that way because it is one of the few structures you can build inside of other structures.
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 7:18 pm
by Cantryjczyk
Racetyme wrote:Its left that way because it is one of the few structures you can build inside of other structures.
Not really. I belive that almost all buildings that we have today can be build inside other buildings. And only two have "or room" in name. They are no diffrent from any others.
We can build halls, brock buildings, cottages, huts, mud huts etc as a rooms in every existing building. I know that it is silly, but my suggestion is about simple changing in names, not changing about how cantr works. That can be discussed in other topics.
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 10:57 pm
by ceselb
Thirded.

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:36 am
by Pie
Forthadidydid....
I agree.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:52 am
by Sicofonte
Come on, go ahead with this now.... please.
I hate those hundreds of "a very new Building or room" I see everywhere.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:06 am
by Zanthos
i must say this is something that has irked me for quite some time...
whenever i see"building or room" i think 'its a room alone, or a building inside another building' for some reason.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:57 am
by marol
Each language translator could do this on his own.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:38 pm
by Sicofonte
Yes, but translators have been said to follow the exact/correct translation of the English version, for consistency. So... can I change the English version first?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:41 pm
by marol
I think it's Resources Department matter...
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 2:41 am
by wichita
Moving to Accepted.
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:41 pm
by wichita
Made the change. There should no longer be free rooms standing outside.
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:31 pm
by Chris Johnson
Thank you RD
So now it becomes an LD issue .... or even a ProgD one as there is no automatic notification of base language changes

... PD. CD, MD and PerD can rest easy