Page 1 of 2
New extension
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:58 pm
by SekoETC
This would be kinda like the shack exept even smaller, and can only be built as an extension. Anyway, I still think it should take a hammer.
Name: walk-in closet
Raws: wood>2500
Days needed: 2
People: 2
Weight: 150000
As the name might hint, something like this would be ideal for storing clothes, since they don't have a weight (yet) and cannot be put into containers (yet).
And also because shack is such an ugly name.
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:58 pm
by viktor
now this opens up some possibilities, a closet leading to a secret wing of the house, locking somebody in the closet etc...
hehe, skeletons you don't want comming out of your closet
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 1:23 pm
by dryn
viktor wrote:locking somebody in the closet etc...
Closet? I thought it would make a nice cheap jail cell.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:15 am
by Pie
dryn wrote:viktor wrote:locking somebody in the closet etc...
Closet? I thought it would make a nice cheap jail cell.
amen to that.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:15 am
by Nosajimiki
wheee cheap jail cells... have those wooden bar locks been implimented yet?
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:57 am
by Nakranoth
No, not yet... other things fall as higher priority...
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:29 am
by wichita
No real complaints yet and I like it, so off we go to Accepted.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:35 am
by Talapus
They would even worse then bikes for removing bodies. At least with shacks, it is actually possible to get enough people inside to drag out a body. I think this is not really needed (the shack I feel already fills this niche), and would be even more abusable then any building that exists now. I would rather see a smaller stone building as a compliment to the shack.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:39 am
by wichita
I already accepted the stone shack a long time ago, but it was killed in RD discussion.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:43 am
by dryn
Talapus wrote:They would even worse then bikes for removing bodies. At least with shacks, it is actually possible to get enough people inside to drag out a body.
Would it be better then if it was bumped to 3 people?
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:12 am
by Nosajimiki
you'd have to find one of those old town leader guys that can single handedly drag people
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:57 am
by Talapus
dryn wrote:Would it be better then if it was bumped to 3 people?
If you make that change, then you are making it even more into a shack.
dryn wrote:you'd have to find one of those old town leader guys that can single handedly drag people Razz
People who can single handedly drag people usually (always?) cannot drag a body single handedly. I have never seen any occurance of a fresh body being dragged by a single person (old bodies weigh so little that anyone can drag them).
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:59 am
by Crosshair
Wicked... i like.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:44 pm
by SekoETC
Do corpses really lose weight in time? I've never heard of such a thing. And where's the sense in dead people being harder to drag than the living?
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:33 pm
by Doug R.
SekoETC wrote:Do corpses really lose weight in time? I've never heard of such a thing. And where's the sense in dead people being harder to drag than the living?
Yes, corpse decay has been around for some time.
Dragging the living operates on a differenct mechanism than dragging the dead. With the dead, you're just dragging 60kg for a fresh body. But you are right, I never saw the sense in dragging the living being easier than dragging the dead either.