This or That Game

[joo]

I'd have to go with the new account, since not being able to do anything for 3 months would make most of my active characters completely useless.


Would you rather get a disease that lasts for 3 months but has no visible symptoms, or a disease that covers your face with a horrible warty rash for 1 week? (The pain caused by each disease is equal).

[playerslayer666]

depends on the amount of pain, but i'd rather deal with a week long rash. i have a select few friends anyway and don't really go out often. my friends wouldn't bother me about it and i don't much care what anyone else thinks.

scenario...... three countries at war. one fights for freedom, one fights for territorial control over the others. the third beefs up it's own defences and fights anything that attacks it. any side you pick will gain a huge advantage and win the war.

1) if you side with the freedom fighters you become a hero and are given a statue in your honor as well as being recorded into their history books. your loved ones are given more than enough money to live out the rest of their lives and you get to see them often. plus you meet many friends in the military. but you one day get captured by a rouge group of sympithizers. you are tortured and beaten for countless years untill finally rescued. when you go home to find your loved ones you are told they are dead, which now makes you an old, semi crippled lonely person, which eventually drives you insane and you are locked up inside an asylum to avoid kiling yourself. at least you are visited by old military friends. your capture, loss of family and mental breakdown are also recorded in the history books.

2) if you side with the invaders you become a general in their army with many skilled soldiers at your disposal. you are recorded into their history books as a brilliant general with no equals in strategy. future generations worship you almost as though you were a god and one day you rule the entire country under a strict millitary rule, but you are stuck staying in the service till the day you die, and you don't even get payed nor receive any merit for your deeds while you are a general, which means you are always expected to do more and do better even though you do your best every day. plus your superiors annoy you....a lot. which is ok cause you have them killed when you rule the country. in addition your loved ones hate you and leave you, then one day your children come back and kill you for being a hostile dictator.

3) if you side with the defenders you will enjoy working with your fellow soldiers and even receive promotions and one day become a captain. you make very good money working for them and it goes to your loved ones and your given the treatment of a glorious hero. your loved ones live richly for the rest of their lives, but you never get to see them or the end of the war. even though they eventually do win. while you were treated as a hero you are NOT remembered as one by future generations or in their history books.

4) or you can do nothing and live in peace with your loved ones in another country far away from the war. the country you now live in is far too big for anyone to ever invade it so the victor of the war is of no consequence to you. however, you do need to learn a new language and find a job somehow, but that's ok cause you have enough money to live off of for the first few months.

pick one. (.......ok this breaks the game rules but still i thought i'd test peoples morality, plus i wrote too much to want to get rid of it. after this is answered the first time i'd like to see other peoples answers via PM. by the way, i pick 4 )

[Rebma]

It would be a toss up between 3 an 4. I don't like wars, or fighting, however, number 3 is my favorite option. Who cares about being remembered in the history books? My family will remember me for generations to come, and will be taken are of. Thats all that matters. Even if it means not seeing them, nor an end to the fighting.



Would you rather be trapped inside each television show a close friend is watching for a day.. or trap your friend in the tv, and watch as they struggle in each show you watch for a day.

[joo]

I'd rather be trapped in the TV, since I don't like sitting on my arse all day watching mindless soap operas...



Would you rather read all but the last book in a very compelling and well-written series, or read an entire series that is not detrimental, but still only average?

[Antichrist_Online]

Entire series.

With regards my earlier this or that, Death in the Sandman comics is a rather hot goth girl, whereas Desire is an androgenous (to the extreme, it can be male or female at will) pale creature.

Destruction or Despair

[SekoETC]

Destruction and not just because of the looks.

Making different kind of food each day or eating the same stuff for days in a row?

[playerslayer666]

different food. variety always wins.

peace and love without unity, or unity by any means necessary without the deaths of innocent people?

[joo]

Peace and Love.



Vinagrette or Balsamic?

[Dudel]

I'm not real big on anything with vinager in it. So Balsamic.


Live forever but you age or live for only a 20 years and you dont age?

[joo]

I'd rather age naturally, in any situation, but if I live forever, can I voluntarily end my life if I want to die? I'll have to go with living forever, with the assumption that I can. If I can't ever die, though, I imagine it would eventually become unbearable to live (and thus you would be essentially in hell).


Would you rather the ability to have sex with corpses or the ability to rape living people was implemented in Cantr?

[*Wiro]

pie the forum goer or actual pie?.....well either way i'd have to pick pie. a good conversation is always nice and so is the flavor of pie in general.

You were supposed to say "Pie, because the cake is a lie." ._.

And I can roleplay both.. But living people would be more fun because then they notice they're getting raped and they're like "Oh no~!" =D

The Flying Spaghetti Monster or Ceiling Cat?

[joo]

You were supposed to say "Pie, because the cake is a lie." ._.

Oh so you've been playing Portal then, eh?

And I can roleplay both..

Really? I think it would be a bit difficult to RP doing something like that to someone without their consent... hmm, unless they were in a very vulnerable position, like with 50% health and in a room alone with you. Otherwise, you can't really RP:

1000-1.10: You notice a man in his twenties who you've never seen before.
1000-1.11: You see a man in his twenties pointing at a woman in her fourties.
1000-1.12: You hear a man in his twenties say "*Jumps out from behind a bush, lands on top of her, ripps open her dress and holds his hand to her mouth as he thrusts in and out of her until she cries out in muffled pain*".

But, ahem... back on topic again.


Flying Spaghetti Monster. I like spaghetti.



Would you rather be beaten with a willow or an oak branch?

[*Wiro]

Bah, is that how you rape people? You should do it outside, so everyone else can enjoy.

And eh, I choose an oak branch. A complete willow would be a bit too painful.

In Cantr: getting raped on the road or getting raped in the middle of town?

[SekoETC]

That's a tricky question. In a town you might end up getting dragged into a building and locked up forever and having spectators around would be embarrassing, although they might also move to help. On the road you can't really get anywhere although there's the plus side of not being draggable... I think I'd still pick town.

And joo should know that when you rape a person in Cantr, it's the character you're raping, not the player. You're supposed to have the player's consent even though they're making their character act non-consensual and it would be poor play not to give the player a chance to act out their character's reaction.

Continuing on the topic, getting raped in Cantr by someone who does it in one line or someone who expects you to interact with them?

[joo]

And joo should know that when you rape a person in Cantr, it's the character you're raping, not the player. You're supposed to have the player's consent even though they're making their character act non-consensual and it would be poor play not to give the player a chance to act out their character's reaction.

I don't think there was any doubt about that (in fact, that was the very point I was trying to make. It has to be reasonable for you to be able to rape them, and they have to participate as well (otherwise you're just raping somebody in their sleep)).

Continuing on the topic, getting raped in Cantr by someone who does it in one line or someone who expects you to interact with them?

I'd much rather have an open-ended, well-RPed rape. It's not role-playing if only one person participates, and being rape in-game is not neccesarily a bad thing - it will give you many interesting RP opportunities during and after that act.


Would you rather play a character of the same sex being raped by a somebody of the opposite, or play a character of the opposite sex having consentual sex with a person of the same sex (as you)?