Page 1 of 1
Two things.
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:42 am
by N-Aldwitch
Two things- one's a complaint really.
If there's a stronger than average, and weaker than average, why the heck isn't there an average?
Second thing: Can you get stronger if you are weaker than average, and could someone give me an estimate of how long this would take? Like, a years' worth of hitting someone, or working, etc?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:45 am
by Piscator
I can answer the first thing. There is!
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:45 am
by notsure
There ARE average people. I have one.
notsure

Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:30 am
by Sho
Physical strength can be trained.
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:24 am
by N-Aldwitch
notsure wrote:There ARE average people. I have one.
notsure

Okay! Cool! Thanks. I haven't seen a single one out of.. some 100 or so characters.
Sho wrote:Physical strength can be trained.
Hmm.. thanks.. but it must obviously take ages? How long, and how?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:44 am
by Nosajimiki
you can train it by fighting or hunting.
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:17 am
by SekoETC
Is the average truly an average of all people or some static value that was in the middle of the range when strengths were initially personalised? Since logically the medium should grow as the strengths increase but never decrease, and newspawns are stronger and stronger year by year - or are they?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:10 am
by marol
Medium can decrease - characters die and another characters spawn. In fact average strength value should be quite related with average life expectancy.
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:47 am
by Agar
Sho wrote:Physical strength can be trained.
Nosajimiki wrote:you can train it by fighting or hunting.
Lies.
I am highly suspecting strength was made visible to debug it.
I have a character who has been hunting daily for 30 years and I am "weaker than average". I've trained my hunting skill up from being awkward to being an expert, so how is it my strength is still listed so low? Does it increment at a lower rate, or simply not from hunting?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:24 am
by Chris Johnson
Strength does improve through hunting but at a slower rate than hunting skill - There is no problem with the implementation
Strength was made visible because of the change in weapon design - so that players would be able to choose the most appropriate weapon for their characters.
The average is a set point - not an average of people in the vicinity
Also with regards inheritence of strength - Characters pass on the base level of strength (the genetic component) to newspawns not the higher trained level. Over time, (unless high strength really does become a radical survial trait) strength levels of new spwans will tend towards the fixed point average.
EDIT moved to General Support
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:56 pm
by SekoETC
Agar wrote:Sho wrote:I have a character who has been hunting daily for 30 years and I am "weaker than average". I've trained my hunting skill up from being awkward to being an expert, so how is it my strength is still listed so low? Does it increment at a lower rate, or simply not from hunting?
At least it's not
much weaker than average. You may have started with the world's weakest character and trained up to just a bit weaker than average.
Chris, could we get statistics on how many characters are much weaker than avg and how many are only weaker? This way people could see they're not alone.
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:08 pm
by Chris Johnson
Current levels as below
Code: Select all
much weaker 18%
weaker 20%
average 20%
stronger 20%
much stronger 23%
Starting points (i.e. genetic base) distribution is
Code: Select all
much weaker 20%
weaker 20%
average 20%
stronger 20%
much stronger 20%
Which shows that strength does improve over time
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:17 pm
by Pieter de Groote
Chris Johnson wrote:Which shows that strength does improve over time
Not true. I don't argue that strength improves, but this does not prove it.
You could also conclude that low strength comes with a suicidal tendency.
(or that characters with low physical strength have a lower life expectancy in general)
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:26 pm
by Chris Johnson
True - if you are speaking of an individual - my observation could have been about the population ... but it wasn't

so point taken .